Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Polish TV crew in trouble in Russia
Radio Polonia ^ | 02.06.2005

Posted on 06/02/2005 11:10:04 AM PDT by lizol

Polish TV crew in trouble in Russia 02.06.2005

A Polish diplomat from the Moscow Embassy has gone to Ingushetia to investigate the curcumstances of the detention in Vladikavkaz, the capital of North Ossetia, of three Polish television journalists. After an 8-hour questioning, they had their video cassettes confiscated and were handed over to the Russian Federation security services. They were accused of filming without permission in the region of troops stationing in North Caucasus.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: caucasus; journalists; northossetia; poland; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-267 next last
To: kaiser80
Terrorism is any kind of action made in order to achive some political, ideological, religious or territorial goals using fear as weapon. So as you see kidnapping for ransom is not terrorism, it's a crime. Killing a leader considered as enemy in war area it's not a terrorism.

WRONG! Where in the world you dug up this logic is beyond me. Frequently in a guerrilla war kidnapping is done to gain funds for the movement. However, many times the kidnapped will also be executed in order to prove the control of the movement as an added bonus. We have seen this done in Iraq where the victim is sometimes released for funds, but more often killed as an instrument of terror. Furthermore, in Iraq many leaders of the new Iraqi government have been killed with a goal of terrorizing the public.

For the rest you're right, no doubt. But that's not the point. I was refering to a statement that guerrilla warfare is somehow connected with terrorism. And thats in deffinition separate things.

You are dead wrong. Guerrilla warfare and terrorism are intimately linked.
61 posted on 06/03/2005 4:23:41 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

So the guys from AK or underground in France were terrorists?


62 posted on 06/03/2005 4:28:11 AM PDT by kaiser80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80

Don't forget that Russia is responsible for creating those terrorist...==

How so? Terrorism in Chechnya started in 1991 when there wasn't war there. Chechen rebel attacks on russian civilians started then.
Later when chechen rebels went through thier compact dwellings the war began.

War was started by chechen armed rebellion as any rebellion anywhere.
During war there were atrocities from both sides.


63 posted on 06/03/2005 4:40:55 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80

So the guys from AK or underground in France were terrorists?==

Terrorism is deliberate armed attack on civilians.

Chechen rebels started terrorism in 1991. In period 1991-94 (before first war ) there was about 30 thousands russians disappear in Chechnya who lived in thier towns like Groznii but about half million became refugees.
It was all under rule of Dzhohar Dudaev before first war.

One of reason of first war was because chechen rebels wanted to cecede from Russia with land of Terek kazaks which was given them by commies for help in Civil war 1918-22.


64 posted on 06/03/2005 4:48:44 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80
So the guys from AK or underground in France were terrorists?

AK??? Did you mean Alaska? You are attempting to make equate the terrorists in Chechnya and the underground movement in France. That is TOTALLY WRONG. Chechnya has been a part of Russia for a couple of hundred years, and the Chechens were not the founders of Chechnya. France was attacked and subjected to the Germans for only four years.
65 posted on 06/03/2005 6:17:03 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
For your information terrorism is a very big factor in all guerrilla wars.

For the last few posts I was trying to understand, with a help of a man that have so precise intel and knowladge of war itself, how can terrorism be a very big factor in all guerrilla wars. I must admit that I was pretty amazed to see that kind of sentence.

AK??? Did you mean Alaska? Damn, I'm speechless...What can I say...I can only regret that the french underground is better known than the largest underground army in the history of mankind. An Army that represented the largest organised and complete underground state. AK= Armia Krajowa (transl. Home Army).

You are attempting to make equate the terrorists in Chechnya and the underground movement in France.

No, I don't. You do.

For your information terrorism is a very big factor in all guerrilla wars.

Chechnya has been a part of Russia for a couple of hundred years, and the Chechens were not the founders of Chechnya.

Poland has been a part of foreing powers for a quite some time too. Does it mean we don't deserve to live free?

66 posted on 06/03/2005 6:48:34 AM PDT by kaiser80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80
Guerrilla warfare is the favorite tactic of terrorist organizations when they're brought to a fight. What else are they going to do? Launch a combined arms multi point offensive?

So as you see kidnapping for ransom is not terrorism, it's a crime. Killing a leader considered as enemy in war area it's not a terrorism.

Kidnapping and then terrorizing the victims is terrorism, just like those people kidnapped in Iraq and made to do videos pleading for their lives. Yes many were released when countries like Italy paid up. Assassination, especially with a bomb in a crowded stadium that got a lot of civilians is terrorism.

67 posted on 06/03/2005 7:23:29 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Logic:

Sentence 1. For your information terrorism is a very big factor in all guerrilla wars.

Sentence 2. Guerrilla warfare is the favorite tactic of terrorist organizations when they're brought to a fight.

Simple example of that logic:

1. All cats are animals.

Other way round:

2. All animals are cats.

Assassination, especially with a bomb in a crowded stadium that got a lot of civilians is terrorism.

You want to tell me that Israel lunched some terrorist strikes? Many assassination of islamic leaders with help of air force were succesfull - target destroyed. But there was some collateral damage. Few civilians died.

68 posted on 06/03/2005 7:38:14 AM PDT by kaiser80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80

If they target civilians as the center of their strategy, yes. If they target enemy combatents, no.


69 posted on 06/03/2005 7:48:38 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Precisely.


70 posted on 06/03/2005 7:52:33 AM PDT by kaiser80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80
how can terrorism be a very big factor in all guerrilla wars.

Through control of the population. Most peasants are afraid to support the government or be neutral because they know the government will leave after a patrol or at night and the terrorists will walk in.

The Vietcong used to butcher whole villages as examples to the rest of the population. Even in the American revolution there were isolated cases of terror against the 1/3rd of the population loyal to the Crown. During the Indian wars in America, there were terror acts against civilians of both the settlers and the indians and that went on for 200 years.

71 posted on 06/03/2005 7:53:59 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80
I have a hint for you: go read up on:

1. Vietnam War
2. Afghanistan
3. Kashmir
4. Malaysian insurgency (sponsored by the Indonesians)
5. Africa over the past 50 years.
After that come talk to us.

72 posted on 06/03/2005 7:56:19 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jb6
I see that we have a different approach to the word "terrorism".

I'm surprised that the word "terrorism", "terrorist" is overused today. One kid slammed another in the face because he wants candy - school terrorism.

During the Indian wars in America, there were terror acts against civilians of both the settlers and the indians and that went on for 200 years.

Terrorism...For me it's genocide of ethnical background, crime.

The Vietcong used to butcher whole villages as examples to the rest of the population.

During a war I wouldn't speek of terrorism although it's a form of terror, no doubt.

During a war, occupation you need to separate the cases of "terrorising" the civilians collaborating with the enemy from any conotation with terrorism as we know it today. Focus the war on terror on real terror, not "terror".

73 posted on 06/03/2005 8:08:22 AM PDT by kaiser80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80
AK??? Did you mean Alaska? Damn, I'm speechless...What can I say...I can only regret that the french underground is better known than the largest underground army in the history of mankind. An Army that represented the largest organised and complete underground state. AK= Armia Krajowa (transl. Home Army).

I'm not impressed with either the Polish or French underground. Americans worked extensively with the French underground through the OSS. The latter was to become one of the founding units of the American Special Forces.

Regarding your amazement that terrorism is a large part of all guerrilla wars, I suspect wearing shoes amazes you too. Your amazement borders on the absurd.

Poland has been a part of foreing powers for a quite some time too. Does it mean we don't deserve to live free?

Yes, you deserve to be free. Poland was recognized as a sovereign state even when it was ruled by the Soviets, which is totally different from Chechnya.
74 posted on 06/03/2005 8:09:30 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jb6
I have a hint for you too: go read up on:

1. World War II

2. Europe in the period lets say 1700-1900

After that come talk to us.

75 posted on 06/03/2005 8:13:02 AM PDT by kaiser80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
I'm not impressed with either the Polish or French underground

With a little knowladge and fair judgement you should be.To that point I had a respect for you. You don't even try to show any respect to others and their heritage...I talk of AK and underground in France, you talk about American Special Forces and Americans working with the French. Further comment is pointless.

76 posted on 06/03/2005 8:21:38 AM PDT by kaiser80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
I suspect wearing shoes amazes you too.

Shoes? We,Poles, don't have any. And belive me, it's really hard to run from a polar bear without shoes...

77 posted on 06/03/2005 8:27:30 AM PDT by kaiser80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80
I see that we have a different approach to the word "terrorism".
I'm surprised that the word "terrorism", "terrorist" is overused today. One kid slammed another in the face because he wants candy - school terrorism.


That is typical of liberalism. If they cannot get their way, then they redefine everything to achieve their goal.

Terrorism...For me it's genocide of ethnical background, crime.

And how will you define terror tomorrow? It's little wonder we can discuss anything, since you want to change the language.

During a war I wouldn't speek of terrorism although it's a form of terror, no doubt.

Raping the German women near the end of WWII was not terrorism...according to you.
78 posted on 06/03/2005 8:28:57 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80

To late, I have and in great detail. What was your point? Guerilla war by a national movement aimed at killing the Nazi occupier is a far cry from a rebel action who's number one target is Christian civilians and who's number two target is their own Chechin civilians. Moral relativism is rather out of mode these days.


79 posted on 06/03/2005 8:32:07 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: kaiser80; GarySpFc; Lion in Winter
During a war, occupation you need to separate the cases of "terrorising" the civilians collaborating with the enemy from any conotation with terrorism as we know it today. Focus the war on terror on real terror, not "terror".

The best double speak I've heard since reading 1984.

80 posted on 06/03/2005 8:33:37 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson