[GarySpFc]

I see that we have a different approach to the word "terrorism".
I'm surprised that the word "terrorism", "terrorist" is overused today. One kid slammed another in the face because he wants candy - school terrorism.

That is typical of liberalism. If they cannot get their way, then they redefine everything to achieve their goal.

Terrorism...For me it's genocide of ethnical background, crime.

And how will you define terror tomorrow? It's little wonder we can discuss anything, since you want to change the language.

During a war I wouldn't speek of terrorism although it's a form of terror, no doubt.

Raping the German women near the end of WWII was not terrorism...according to you.

[kaiser80]

No, it's not a sign of liberalism. I simply hate when someone and especially media is overusing some word...

Holocaust was terrorism? No, it was genocide. The aim was to kill not to frighten. So was with Indians, whey wanted to kill and hell they did. People were scared. Yep.

Raping the German women near the end of WWII was not terrorism...according to you.

No. It was raping the German women near the end of WWII. A war crime. A sex crime. Soldiers wanted to have sex, wanted to punish, wanted revange. The aim was not to defeat the enemy, not to frightened him, not to acomplish any goals...