Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Gitmo authorities should react to the Koran in the toilet stories. (Vanity)

Posted on 05/27/2005 10:51:37 AM PDT by carrier-aviator

I am so sick of the lefty press, people who polling tells us are largely non-religious or atheist, weeping over mistreatment of the "Holy Koran."

First: If they are going to call the Koran the "Holy Koran," then the Bible ought to merit the "holy" adjective as well.

Second: The lefty writers write in seeming shock, sadness, and outrage that the Muslim holy book was "touched inappropriately." Please. Inasmuch as the writers largely don't believe in God, why do they give a damn? For them it is about as sacred as the TV Guide.

But, they DO give a damn simply because they know that their reporting of these MINOR incidents will forward two of their goals:

(1) Bad press for the Bush Administration (2) Turmoil in the Muslim world, causing more of number (1), above.

A real twofer.

Muslim detainees and the Muslim holy book are treated far better in U.S. captivity than they would be in any other country on the face of the earth, including Muslim countries.

It is time that U.S. government officials stop apologizing, and raise the BS flag. They oughta say:

"In the past some of our people did things to the Koran that some Muslims seem to consider inappropriate. Let's face it: if such things were done by the guards to a Christian Bible or Jewish Torah there would be little notice, so we consider the excessive press relegated to these stories a tad curious and disproportional, especially since the press never seems to worry about disrespect to Christian and Jewish symbols, "the piss Christ" and the "Madonna surrounded by dung," for example. Regardless, we have directed our guards to be more careful, but we are not going to get all weepy about inadvertent and unintentional disrespect to a BOOK. We have given FAR MORE consideration to these Muslim detainees with regard to their religious and dietary practices than we have ever done for any group of detainees or prisoners in the history of the republic; and we are exceedingly proud of this record. But, our guards are not clerics and they cannot and will not be schooled in the intricacies of how an Imam would treat a Koran in a mosque. As I just stated, I believe our guards and camp systems have been extraordinarily respectful to Muslim religious sensitivities. We will continue to do our utmost to uphold this standard, but this standard is way more than is required. ORDINARY DEFERENCE, the kind of deference we would give to Christian or Jewish detainees is all the Muslim detainees merit. Equal deference should be given to all religions. But, as is the U.S. tradition, we are doing more than is required. This will be my last comment on the Koran in the toilet story."

When I start seeing banner headlines in the NY Times about instances of lack of respect for Christianity and Judaism (and their symbols and traditions) I will begin to take their hand-wringing pieces on disrepsect for the "Holy" Koran seriously.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: flushmore; korandesecration; liberalmedia

1 posted on 05/27/2005 10:51:37 AM PDT by carrier-aviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: carrier-aviator

Very well written. If only some of our military & political leadership had this level of clarity and forthrightness!


2 posted on 05/27/2005 10:56:19 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (No rolling stone ever says, "I want to be a Bryologist when I grow up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carrier-aviator
How any country should treat terrorists - and the way the US military did in WWII. You have a fair military tribunal and then you fairly execute them. Enough with this PC nonsense...
3 posted on 05/27/2005 10:56:45 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carrier-aviator
Well said... If you read detailed accounts of the "desecration" the detainees said their Korans faced, it includes things like "turning the pages too quickly" and "grabbing it without respect" and the like... Of course, all these complaints are lumped in with "flushing it down a toilet" in the MSM...
4 posted on 05/27/2005 11:05:37 AM PDT by vrwinger ("I don't even know what cheating is..." - Barry Bonds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carrier-aviator
They should "react" by very publicly announcing that those toilets are not to be used until they've had a very thorough cleaning.
5 posted on 05/27/2005 11:10:20 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carrier-aviator

Excellent! Every point right on the money.


6 posted on 05/27/2005 11:15:54 AM PDT by Desron13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carrier-aviator
Why are we bending over backwords to accomodate the religious sensibilities of these amimals? I see no reason why these detainees should have been provided access to the Koran in the first place. What purpose does this serve? If we did not provide these pieces of human excrement with Korans and accomodate their so-called religious needs, the desecration of this so-called holy book would not be an issue. Can someone please enlighten me on why we have a policy of accomodating these scum?
7 posted on 05/27/2005 12:33:54 PM PDT by awaken2spirit (When one fornicates with ignorance, the result of that union is chaos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carrier-aviator

Hollywood, the MSM, HBO, Time Magazine, and the New York Times have been flushing the Holy Bible down the toilet for decades, So? What's the big deal?


8 posted on 05/27/2005 1:27:49 PM PDT by TET1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carrier-aviator

Only a foolish nation would fret over how it handles the enemy's playbook.


9 posted on 05/27/2005 3:23:31 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson