1 posted on
05/26/2005 9:45:59 PM PDT by
Coleus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Coleus
Father of child
Baster, Turkey
2 posted on
05/26/2005 9:47:04 PM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
ping to self for later pingout.
Blech.
3 posted on
05/26/2005 9:47:47 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
To: Coleus
This is about the dumbest thing I ever heard of.
Sure this isn't Massachusetts?
4 posted on
05/26/2005 9:50:22 PM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(In God We Trust. All Others We Monitor.)
To: Coleus
Imagine what it's like to want a real dad.
To: Coleus
Thus, they will both be listed as parents on the birth certificate of little Vivian Ryan LoCicero, who was born on April 30, once the document is issued.
Isn't this just the sweetest thing?
6 posted on
05/26/2005 9:50:26 PM PDT by
de Buillion
(Thank God for GWB, Ann Coulter, and PARIS HILTON!)
To: Coleus
7 posted on
05/26/2005 9:51:13 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
To: Coleus
Put anything you like on the birth certificate you selfish narcissistic libs. It's ALL ABOUT YOU. The fact you are screwing up a kid forever really doesn't enter into it does it? That's beside the point isn't it. Let's change right and wrong and all of society to fit our immature wants and needs.
grumble....grumble.... Sorry, when selfishness and stupidity reign it gets my Irish up.
12 posted on
05/26/2005 9:54:55 PM PDT by
IrishCatholic
(No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
To: Coleus
No mention of the gender of the baby? I'm not going to take the name "Vivian" at face value with these types.
13 posted on
05/26/2005 9:55:32 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government)
To: Coleus
What's the point?
To: Coleus
This is child exploitation.
To: Coleus
The document will be factually incorrect, and therefore useless. Doesn't the judge care about that at all? Does he not understand the purpose of such documents is to assemble information based on facts, not on 'feelings'? It's not a birth announcement, for cryin' out loud...it's for record keeping purposes. Or at least they used to be.
Yes, those are rhetorical questions. It's obvious the judge was bitten by a rabid moonbat long ago and has the venom coursing through his bloodstream.
This is another reason to scorn the Slimy Sucker Seven for their 'compromise'. They are perpetuating exactly this type of idiocy.
23 posted on
05/26/2005 10:14:08 PM PDT by
LostInBayport
(One Massachusetts conservative adrift in a sea of liberal lunacy...)
To: Coleus
Rosie O'Donnell is actually a man, isn't he? I mean, he must have been so pleased to hear that Kelli Carpenter was pregnant and he wasn't shooting blanks.
25 posted on
05/26/2005 10:16:04 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(...I'm not sorry, but I just couldn't resist.)
To: Coleus
Before reacting we ought to look at the statute. It appears that the court is somehow fixing financial responsibility on a willing lesbian partner for the financial care of the kid. So far so good, this relieves the tax payer to the degree she is responsible.
The degree to which this ruling confers parental rights on the lesbian partner who has not otherwise qualified under adoption proceedings is quite another matter because that affects the child's rights without a guardian in fact or law to protect his interests in the matter. If this is merely an end run around the adoption statutes, it is highly improper.
26 posted on
05/26/2005 10:16:21 PM PDT by
nathanbedford
(The UN was bribed and Good Men Died)
To: Coleus
..........father of child,???? or second mother of child??
GOD HELP US!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
27 posted on
05/26/2005 10:16:27 PM PDT by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: Coleus
Poor child, I can hear the taunts now, "Who's your Daddy?"
Why is it that adults can be so damn selfish and never consider the consequences to the children of their actions.
32 posted on
05/26/2005 10:29:42 PM PDT by
SuziQ
To: Coleus
This may be news in New York but it is not news. Most states can have a Pre-Birth Order in place before a baby is born, and Parent 1 and Parent 2 can be placed on the birth certificate.
34 posted on
05/26/2005 10:32:40 PM PDT by
Yaelle
To: Coleus
they will both be listed as parents on the birth certificate So much for reality.
44 posted on
05/27/2005 4:20:33 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Coleus
"thinking themselves wise, they became fools..."
48 posted on
05/27/2005 6:00:41 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: Coleus
Here we go... the real reason behind "gay" marriage.
53 posted on
05/27/2005 4:48:28 PM PDT by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(You should be TERRIfied that you may someday be SCHIAVOed to death!)
To: Coleus
How is this charted in the form: Mother - Kimberly Robinson; father unknown. Where does the other chick's name go?
54 posted on
05/27/2005 4:54:19 PM PDT by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(You should be TERRIfied that you may someday be SCHIAVOed to death!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson