Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LA Times Threatens O'Reilly with Secret Service (BWAAA HAAA HAAA IDIOT ALERT!)
NewsMax ^ | 5/25/05

Posted on 05/25/2005 11:27:23 AM PDT by areafiftyone

The Los Angeles Times is slamming Bill O’Reilly – for slamming the Los Angeles Times.

The newspaper has warned the "telephilosopher” to stop his "decapitation fantasies” involving Times editorial page editor Michael Kinsley – or face trouble from the Secret Service.

It all started with a Times editorial urging the shutdown of the terrorist detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and access to attorneys for detainees. That set off O’Reilly. During the broadcast of "The Radio Factor with Bill O’Reilly” on May 17, he declared:

"How can they think this way? How can anyone think this way? You know, ‘Shutting down Guantanamo and giving suspected terrorists legal protections would help restore our reputation abroad.'”

Said O’Reilly: "That’s like saying, 'Well, if we’re nicer to the people who want to kill us, then the other people who want to kill us will like us more.'”

Then he fired off the big gun, saying the paper’s editorial board will "never get it until they (the terrorists) grab Michael Kinsley out of his little house and they cut his head off. And maybe when the blade sinks in, he’ll go, ‘Perhaps O’Reilly was right.’”

The Times counterattacked in a May 24 editorial. Questioning why people the U.S. has liberated from tyranny "don’t love us,” the paper stated: "It doesn’t seem worthy of decapitation to suggest that ghastly stories (not all fabricated by Newsweek) about abuse of prisoners don’t help.”

The Times has long had an axe to grind with Fox News. Much of the paper’s anger no doubt comes from Fox’s coverage of the Times’ last-minute smear job on Arnold Schwarzenegger in the days leading up to the 2003 gubernatorial recall race.

For the moment, O’Reilly is in the liberal paper’s crosshairs, warning: "O’Reilly should be careful. Any further decapitation fantasies could get him in serious trouble with the Secret Service.”

It seems the paper has difficulty distinguishing between a threat and a "fantasy.” And when it comes to actual threats against its employees, the paper may want to check with its lawyers on whom to contact.

The Secret Service deals with threats against the President and Vice President, not editorial writers.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foxnews; idiotalert; latimes; oreilly; usss; victimhood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: richardtavor
and presidential candidates

Those who are virutally assured of the nomination, and only for several months ever 4 years.

41 posted on 05/25/2005 12:23:09 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager

Michael Kinsley couldn't even make it as the TV president in West Wing.


42 posted on 05/25/2005 12:33:24 PM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
The newspaper has warned the "telephilosopher” to stop his "decapitation fantasies” or face trouble from the Secret Service.

I guarantee that O'Rielly will hit on this ignorant gaff... tonight!!! These idiots view of their self importance knows no end when they think that the secret service would be guarding members of the LA times staff!
43 posted on 05/25/2005 2:44:31 PM PDT by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; VPMWife78; cgk; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

44 posted on 05/25/2005 3:22:58 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; Doctor Raoul; ELS; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

45 posted on 05/25/2005 3:23:31 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

We weren't loved by Japan when we went in, but today we have a good relationship.

The Times reflects again the desires of children in wanting to see INSTANT gratification and results that have historically taken decades every other time on earth.

No wonder their paper is mostly wanted by people with birds for the cage floors.


46 posted on 05/25/2005 3:26:52 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Kinsley = hysterical woman.

LAT reporters (both sexes) = hysterical women.

47 posted on 05/25/2005 4:06:57 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Support Our Troops, Spit On A Liberal Reporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
(not all fabricated by Newsweek) about abuse of prisoners = LA Times takes the word of terorists, while knocking our troops.
48 posted on 05/25/2005 4:08:19 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Support Our Troops, Spit On A Liberal Reporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Since when did that faggoty little wimp Kinsley become an elected representative?

Please do say things like that, you know hopw easily he crys...

49 posted on 05/25/2005 4:11:06 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Support Our Troops, Spit On A Liberal Reporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone; All

Wow I didn't know LA Times have that much power LOL!!

Silly me I live in SO CAL

Can I tell LA Times marking that they sucks or would I face call from FBI LOL!


50 posted on 05/25/2005 4:55:35 PM PDT by SevenofNine (Not everybody in, it for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

ROFLOL!

Hello, LA TIMES! How dumb do you have to be to think like this?!


51 posted on 05/25/2005 5:43:20 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
For the moment, O’Reilly is in the liberal paper’s crosshairs, warning: "O’Reilly should be careful. Any further decapitation fantasies could get him in serious trouble with the Secret Service.”


52 posted on 05/25/2005 8:29:04 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
If O'Reilly keeps it up, he will have to answer to the East German Secret Police.

Alles klar, Herr Komisar?

53 posted on 05/25/2005 8:31:45 PM PDT by Petronski (A champion of dance, my moves will put you in a trance, and I never leave the disco alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Thanks for the ping.


54 posted on 05/25/2005 8:38:48 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Only the twisted little minds of the Times could construe Bill's remarks as a threat instead of an observation.
HELLO! Anybody in there?!


55 posted on 05/25/2005 8:40:06 PM PDT by Nevermore (Mad as Zell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Thanks for the ping!


56 posted on 05/25/2005 9:05:01 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

But no! Fox News is RUN by the White House, didn't you know that?! They wouldn't investigate their own talking head, would they!?

</sarcasm>


57 posted on 05/26/2005 2:31:28 PM PDT by DTwistedSisterS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

The Secret Service deals with threats against the President and Vice President, not editorial writers.

&&&
Yes, but the writer neglects the fact that. since these so-called journalists are above the Bush and Cheney, they must be deserving of USSS protection. Probably a special detail.


58 posted on 05/26/2005 5:24:55 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Go ahead, President Kinsley, give 'em a call...


59 posted on 05/26/2005 5:34:35 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Carnac: A siren, a baby and a liberal. Answer: Name three things that whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Kinsley was a little sh*t years ago on TV, and he hasn't improved with age.


60 posted on 05/26/2005 5:39:32 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson