Before too many people start bashing Sen. Frist, I thought it appropriate to put his own words on this thread. From a 5/24/05 mass E-mail to interested parties (including me):
As promised, an update on the judicial nominee front ...
Last night, an arrangement was reached by fourteen of my colleagues. I was not a party to it, and here's why...
I do not agree with it because it does not get the job done of ensuring fair, up or down votes on all judicial nominees sent to the Senate by the President.
It is my firm belief that--on principle--all judicial nominees deserve an up or down vote on the floor of the United States Senate.
The new understanding, if followed in good faith, affirms my principle to some extent. It marks some break in the partisan obstruction of the past two years, and ensures that seven outstanding jurists-including Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown and William Pryor--will get the fair up or down votes they have long deserved.
But it does not grant fairness to all other jurists. It still allows mindless filibusters to be triggered at the whim of a minority more interested in obstruction than progress.
And that is a shame.
So make no mistake, the Constitutional Option remains on the table. If the minority again acts in bad faith--if they resume their campaign of mindless judicial obstruction--I will NOT hesitate to call it to a vote.
Not for a second.
For too long on judicial nominees, the filibuster was abused to facilitate partisanship, and subvert principle.
We have exposed the injustice of judicial obstruction in the last Congress, and advanced the core Constitutional principle that all judicial nominees deserve a fair up or down vote on the floor of the U.S. Senate.
So the Senate will begin to execute this arrangement, with a vote up or down on Priscilla Owen. Giving up their minority-party led obstructionism, the Senate invoked cloture on her today by a vote of 81-18. Priscilla Owen--after four years, two weeks and two days--will finally receive the fair, up or down vote she deserves.
And, mark my words, more judges like her will follow in the days ahead. I hope the minority will respect the will of the majority, and give judges the courtesy, the respect, of a fair, up or down vote.
Bill Frist
He knows on which side of his bread is buttered.
The Rinos will pay next election - (I'm willing to use vacation time from work and travel to campaign against them, and I'm not alone).
BILL FRIST IS THE MAJORITY LEADER> That is his title.
This is a CULTURE war and Bill Frist let his troops surrender and his excuse is he can't control his toops and is not bound by what they do.
Consider this as if it were real.
Several Generals under Eisenhower are claiming a great victory over the enemy. Just hours before Ike was to launch the D DAy invasion a group of his generals have negotiated a deal with the German Government. In Return for Germany dropping plans to attack England, Scotland, Wales but not Ireland, the allies have agreed to let the German Government retain total control of Germany. Germany also will still occupy but not control France and Poland.
In adddition Germany agrees to give up all claims to Africa and to only kill those Jews that are extremists.
The German Government also agreed to not sink any alllied ships with submarines unless they were carrying things Germany does not like.
Many in the media are claiming this a great allied victory. It is said to have averted nearly 50 thousand deaths that would have occured during the D Day invasion.
Eisenhower said he was not part of the agreement and reserved the right to invade nomandy if the Germans ever do anything nasty.
Wow! Frist is one tough cookie! A "shame!" Such soaring rhetoric, such resounding condemnation!
That does it for me, Senator, you're off the hook with nary a strand of your beautifully coiffed hair ruffled. All hail the Senate!
What a joke.
Thanks for sharing...