Posted on 05/23/2005 9:25:10 AM PDT by Idisarthur
Should minors be required to notify a parent before getting an abortion? Y or N. (Freep this Poll)
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Done.
I answere "no"... (just kidding)
Yes 70% 25967 votes
No 30% 10939 votes
Total: 36906 votes
Of course, otherwise, who will the parents know to sue?
Yes
|
70%
|
25967 votes
|
|
No
|
30%
|
10939 votes
|
|
Total: 36906 votes
|
|||
This QuickVote is not scientific and reflects the opinions of only those Internet users who have chosen to participate. The results cannot be assumed to represent the opinions of Internet users in general, nor the public as a whole. The QuickVote sponsor is not responsible for content, functionality or the opinions expressed therein.
|
The counter is not moving at all. Wonder how long it takes to refresh.
Been there.
FReeped that.
'as wierd, I voted and, I feel pretty good that, others have voted in between your post and mine, yet the count remains the same?
:O)
P
For CNN to be getting 70% yes is rather unusual.
My experience with online CNN polls is that they lean on the left.
Pro-death people usually say Fathers are raping their daughter so therefore they shouldn't be force to notify their father. (funny and laughable)
Maybe they should be force to - it stands to reason that the Mom will learn something in the process.
Abortion Providers love abortions as they lines their pockets. Conflict of interest.
I imagine the numbers will shift once that "other" forum calls on their members to "DUmmy" this poll...
Define minor?
16 years old.
14 years old.
12 years old.
10 years old.
8 years old.
6 years old.
4 years old.
Is there any point in here where a child is too young to make such a decision themselves? Or do liberals just want to give children Carte Blanc?
30%----no
I think it's only fair that minors be able to abort their parents, given that parents can abort their minors. As for giving notice, as long as each has to give notice to the other, then that also would be fair. As for choice of weapons, in the name of fairness, I should hope that the relative disadvantage of the minor might be compensated by a sufficient force multiplier.
Yes children should be required. It is the same as any other medical procedure.
Additionally the excuse cited by the pro-aborts is that the child may be a victim of rape or incest. Killing the baby in secrecy only shields the criminal from prosecution. If the girl won't tell her parents about the abortion, she certainly won't be going to court without their knowledge.
The pro-aborts are also pro-child rape.
lol
The Sex Positive Agenda (of which the Homosexual Agenda is merely a battering ram to laws and mores) is pushing for just that. Do as thou will.
Now, it stands at
Yes 70% 56400 votes
No 30% 24230 votes
Total: 80630 votes
They must not have liked the Freeped results, so they pulled it.
The question there now is: "Do you think German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder will win another term in office?"
There's no "Who Cares?" choice. ;)
That is 'amazing'! From 36,000 to 88,000 total votes, the 70 to 30 percetage stays exactly the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.