Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Divisibility by Seven
sciencenews.org ^ | 21 May 05 | Ivars Peterson

Posted on 05/20/2005 10:47:46 PM PDT by Arkie2

It's easy to tell if a given whole number is divisible by 2. Just check whether the last digit is even. There are also simple rules to determine whether a number is divisible by 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, or 10. The exception is 7.

The known rules for testing for divisibility by 7 are amazingly cumbersome.

Here's one such rule. To find out if a number is divisible by 7, double the last digit, then subtract it from the remaining digits of the number. If you get an answer divisible by 7, then the original number is divisible by 7. If you don't know whether the new number is divisible by 7, you apply the rule again.

For example, to check whether 616 is divisible by 7, double the last digit (6 x 2 = 12), then subtract the answer from the remaining digits (61 – 12 = 49). Because 49 is divisible by 7, so is 616.

The method works quite well for small numbers. For larger numbers, the rule is sufficiently complicated that it takes nearly as much effort to check for divisibility as it would be to perform the division operation itself.

Over the years, people have come up with dozens of algorithms for divisibility by 7. The latest entry comes from Gustavo Gerald Toja Frachia of São Paulo University.

Here's an example of how Toja's ingenious method works.

Consider the following multiple of 7: 6,049,344 Separate the number into pairs of digits, starting from the right. 6 04 93 44 Calculate the difference between each pair of digits and the nearest upper or lower multiple of 7, beginning with the first pair at the right. For the first pair, use the lower multiple, for the second use the upper multiple, for the third use the lower multiple, and so on. 44 – 42 = 2; 98 – 93 = 5; 04 – 0 = 4; 7 – 6 = 1 Write out the resulting digits in the order in which they were calculated. 2541 Repeat the process on the digits 2541. 25 41 41 – 35 = 6; 28 – 25 = 3 63 The final pair, 63, is a multiple of 7. Hence, the original number must also be a multiple of 7. Toja describes his method and explains why it works at http://www.divisibilitybyseven.mat.br/. He argues that his algorithm is remarkably fast and efficient for determining if large numbers are divisible by 7.

Alexander Bogolmolny recently extended Toja's algorithm to divisibility by 11 and 13 (see http://www.cut-the-knot.org/blue/div7-11-13.shtml), and Toja added a way of determining the remainder when a number isn't divisible by 7.

Interestingly, Toja's method starts off in much the same way as an algorithm developed by L. Vosburgh Lyons, a New York neuropsychiatrist. This method was first disclosed by Martin Gardner in a 1962 Scientific American article.

Here's the example that Gardner uses to demonstrate the Lyons test.

From right to left, mark off the digits in pairs. 2 35 94 06 17 88 39 For each pair, calculate its excess over a multiple of 7. 2 0 3 6 3 4 4 Gather the excesses in groups of three, from the right, and add each of the three columns separately. 3 4 4; 0 3 6; 2 3 + 0 = 3; 4 + 3 = 7; 4 + 6 + 2 = 12 Reduce the three sums by calculating the excess of each over a multiple of 7. 3 0 5 Record the excess of the first and second digits, taken together, over a multiple of 7 on the left. Record the excess of the second and third digits, taken together, over a multiple of 7 on the right. 2 5 Subtract the left digit from the right digit. (If the right digit is smaller, add 7 before subtracting.) This final digit is the remainder when the original number is divided by 7. Thus, the original number is divisible by 7 if and only if this final digit is 0. 3 It still seems like a lot of work! There's just something about 7 that brings in all sorts of complexities.

At a time when calculators and computers are ubiquitous, it's not clear how useful it is to know algorithms for divisibility. Playing with numbers, however, has an enduring appeal, especially when it comes to mystical "7


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: 7; 7daysinmay; magnificentseven; math; science; sevensamurai
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
I remember this from 10th grade! NOT
1 posted on 05/20/2005 10:47:46 PM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

I just use a calculator. :-)


2 posted on 05/20/2005 11:01:50 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

Works for me too.


3 posted on 05/20/2005 11:03:56 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

has someone in this thread know how to manually calculate square roots?. I forgot, hahahaha.


4 posted on 05/20/2005 11:07:43 PM PDT by angelanddevil2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angelanddevil2

Nope. I got that little square root thingy on my calculator. Of course, I'm not sure I ever knew how to do that anyway!


5 posted on 05/20/2005 11:11:41 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: angelanddevil2

I used to know how to multiply, divide and raise numbers to non-integer powers using logarithms. Do they still teach this in high school?


6 posted on 05/20/2005 11:22:59 PM PDT by Otho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

this post would get a lot more responses except the new star wars movie is out, and all the geeks are still in line.


7 posted on 05/20/2005 11:24:47 PM PDT by jsk10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angelanddevil2
My dad taught me when I was a kid, but I've forgotten, too. Of course, with Google handy....Taking the Square Root of a Number
8 posted on 05/20/2005 11:28:06 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jsk10

ROFL..

You guys sure talk about some strange stuff in the middle of the night


9 posted on 05/20/2005 11:29:20 PM PDT by Xenophobic Alien (Nuke the whales! -- You really want to nuke whales? -- Well ya got to nuke something. -- Touche')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jsk10

I wouldn't be posting this if I was near a theatre where I could see it!


10 posted on 05/20/2005 11:29:31 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Otho

I barely remember how to use a slide rule.


11 posted on 05/20/2005 11:31:09 PM PDT by djf (Sheep logic, or why sheep aren't mathematicians: I'll give up my freedom to preserve freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

seven's are easy because it's just adding touchdowns!


12 posted on 05/20/2005 11:31:30 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (When can we stop pretending that the Left doesn't by and large hate America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angelanddevil2
Google search for "manual square roots" shows:
13 posted on 05/20/2005 11:32:25 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
I just use a calculator. :-)

CALCULATOR! Not me. Now where did I put my slide rule? I know it's around here somewhere....

14 posted on 05/20/2005 11:34:19 PM PDT by SirChas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

All I know is...


One is the loneliest number
There can ever be
Two can be as bad as one


15 posted on 05/20/2005 11:36:33 PM PDT by socal_parrot (Why a duck?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak

That two point conversion rule gives me fits though!


16 posted on 05/20/2005 11:37:19 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SirChas
Now where did I put my slide rule? I know it's around here somewhere....

Try your pocket protector, next to the leaky pen.

17 posted on 05/20/2005 11:38:06 PM PDT by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

It would be more useful to be able to cut a pizza into seven equal pieces. And to know how many 6-packs to buy so 7 people can each have an equal number of cans.


18 posted on 05/20/2005 11:38:33 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirChas; djf
slide rule..

Yeah, I used one in Electronics School way back when.. '69-'70...

I still have a few around, but probably would have trouble doing anything more complicated than multiplication with it now..

19 posted on 05/20/2005 11:39:54 PM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

The six pack thingy is easy. The answer is one. The designated driver gets to watch!


20 posted on 05/20/2005 11:40:34 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson