Did I hear that right?
Posted on 05/16/2005 2:44:56 PM PDT by Cornpone
The Left’s journalistic jihad against the War on Terror inspired the deaths of 16 Muslims, the injury of at least 100 more, the destruction of numerous Western buildings, and untold hatred for U.S. troops stationed in the Arab world – with a lie.
The May 9 issue of Newsweek vouchsafed that a new report issued by the Southern Command (“SouthCom,” which includes Guantanamo Bay) would reveal that, “in at least one case,” a Gitmo GI attempting to interrogate Muslims “flushed a holy book [Koran] down the toilet.” Leftist writer Michael Isikoff and partner John Barry cited an unnamed “senior U.S. government official” as the source for this tiny paragraph, oddly out of place with the larger story in which it was embedded. However, they did due diligence, Newsweek claims, by trying to verify the story with two subsequent officials who, respectively, gave no comment and did not specifically deny the charge. (The latter did not deny it, because he knew little about the report in question.) On the basis of one anonymous source, one “no comment,” and one non-denial from an uninformed source, Newsweek pressed forward with the damning release.
The trouble began when Pakistani opposition leader Imran Khan held a copy of the prevaricating Newsweek story high aloft during a press conference, thundering, “This is what the U.S. is doing, desecrating the Koran!” Others helped Khan spread the Newsweek scoop. “The American soldiers are known for disrespect to other religions. They do not take care of the sanctity of other religions,” chimed in Qazi Hussain Ahmed, the pro-Osama chief of Jamaat-e-Islami (“Party of Islam”), which calls for the “Islamization” of Pakistan.
Soon riots had broken out throughout the Muslim world, from Malaysia to the Suez Canal, with violent crowds chanting “Death to America!” and burning American flags – and U.S. and UN government buildings. A Palestinian protestor stomping through the Jabalya refugee camp raging, “The Holy Koran was defiled by the dirtiest of hands, by American hands.” The strongest of uprisings took place in the Afghan mountain town and Taliban-stronghold of Jalalabad, with many demonstrations led by “remnants of the Taliban” (with its legendary tolerance for other faiths’ religious symbols).
All the while, the Left jeered knowingly. Howard Dean’s “Blog for America” [sic.] gloated over the revelations and the subsequent riots, inexplicably tying the fabricated infraction to Gen. Jerry Boykin.
In an attempt to stop the hemorrhaging, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice issued a strongly worded statement attesting, “Disrespect for the Holy Koran is not now, nor has it ever been, nor will it ever be, tolerated by the United States. Disrespect for the Holy Koran is abhorrent to us all.” Still, 16 Muslims died and more than 100 were injured before the media-inspired hatred came to an end.
And now the writers admit the story was false.
In the newest issue of Newsweek, which hits newsstands today, Editor Mark Whitaker and Assistant Managing Editor Evan Thomas tell their readers the original source cannot remember where he read the allegation of flushing the word of Allah. This means he cannot verify it is in any government report. In fact, the glossy rag now questions whether the incident ever occurred. While not ruling it out conclusively (proving a negative is logically impossible), Whitaker told Reuters, “As to whether anything like this happened, we just don't know.” Whitaker tells his own readers, “We regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst.”
Thomas, however, writes a long story about the impact of his publication’s malfeasance entitled, “How a Fire Broke Out,” in which he all but pours gasoline on the raging fires of Islamist revulsion. Thomas justifies Newsweek’s coverage of the scantily sourced provocation on the grounds that similar reports had been issued – by released detainees and al-Jazeera Television. When weighed in that balance, this newest allegation “seemed shocking but not incredible.”
He then expresses shock this tiny story would touch off violence “[a]fter so many gruesome reports of torture and abuse at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere.” I mean, what’s the angry mob’s problem: don’t they read Newsweek?
Thomas also shifts blame for the widespread Islamic unrest to the government of U.S. ally Hamid Karzai, which, “pressed by the United States,” shut down domestic opium producers. Besides, “Afghan men are sometimes rounded up during ongoing U.S. military operations” and “many Afghans regard [Karzai] as too dependent on and too obsequious to the United States.” Although aware that the State Department feared Islamist riots would topple friendly Muslim governments around the globe, Thomas nearly drafts Osama’s Declaration of Independence.
After excusing the backlash his employees’ story engendered, Thomas rightly notes there is widespread belief the substance of this story was fraudulent. When asked about Michael Isikoff’s charges, Pentagon spokesman Lawrence DiRita inquired of his interviewer, “People are dead because of what this son of a bitch said. How could he be credible now?”
Fully acknowledging the impact of one widely reported anti-Muslim atrocity story, Thomas proceeds to all list two more unverified accounts immediately after this quotation. Thomas cites Gitmo detainee lawyer Marc D. Falkoff’s claim that an American serviceman stomped on a Koran and former detainee Bader Zaman Bader’s avowal that another serviceman threw a Koran in an inmate’s latrine.[1] (Bader Bader says nightmares still plague him, even though the GI immediately apologized – strange behavior from a heartless MP.) Recognizing that his editorial team got nearly a score of Muslims killed in the past week, Evan Thomas all but begs pacified Muslims to resume torching Western aide centers.
Thomas omits the fact that a Pentagon spokesman told Newsweek it “had investigated other desecration charges by detainees and found them ‘not credible.’” Many of these original allegations were popularized by the Muslim Council of Britain, the largest Muslim organization in the UK which, when it isn’t calumniating Allied soldiers protecting its host nation from its constituents, stays busy inventing tales of Islamaphobia. The MCB also opposed the war against the Taliban and refused to take part in the commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, because the event ignored “ongoing genocide and human rights abuses around the world and in the occupied territories of Palestine.”
Army Colonel Brad Blackner exposed the true provenance of this psychological warfare, noting, “If you read the al-Qaeda training manual, they are trained to make allegations against the infidels.” Hence, Medea Benjamin and Leslie Cagan made exposing troop “atrocities” one of the key functions of their Baghdad-based anti-American venture, Occupation Watch. Convicted terrorist lawyer Lynne Stewart similarly counseled her client to claim the Ashcroft Justice Department had denied him his diabetic medication – to whip his supporters into a violent frenzy culminating in bloodshed.
Despite a plenitude of false premises, Newsweek’s Thomas comes to a true conclusion: “More allegations, credible or not, are sure to come,” and “Such stories may spark more trouble.”
Credible or not, it seems likely Evan Thomas and Newsweek will broadcast them to the best of their ability.
ENDNOTES:
1. The aforementioned Marc Falkoff should not be confused with the American Enterprise Institute’s homonymic Latin American expert, Mark Falcoff.
That's the big problem we have. Not what we do, what they can do. They're irrational, and armed. We can't keep skating on this thin ice for long.
Did I hear that right?
It is doubtful that President Bush, or the Justice Dept. can legally do anything about this story. But what if they selected to deny access to Newsweek to all Presidential press conferences, news briefings etc.?
The outrage from the rest of the press would be horrendous, but who would deny (other than extreme leftists) that the denial of access was not justified?
Admittance to such briefings is after all a privilege, not a right and actions have consequences. If Newsweek abuses their privilege and people die as a result, is it not reasonable to deny them the privilege of covering the President?
Michael Isikoff? Isn't he the "journalist" that had the BillyJeff & Monica story and spiked it? Naa, no way a credible journalist would pull something so blatant. Would he? That's what I thought, he sure did! Balanced journalism. Yep that's what it is.
Is Falkoff in any way related to Jack Mehoff? How would like to have gone through junior high school with a name which is homophonic with f*** off?
Anyone who supports our troops should care. False information, such as this, when disseminated will have negative repercussions for our troops, those bastards over there will use this as further reasons to fight us and recruit other animalistic barbarians.
"...in the meantime, a woman is dead. Who do I see about that?"
Yeah, but they hate us as maximum density already as being infidels.
Nothing, nothing we can do.. Destroy korans, nuke mecca, anything can make the islamic world hate us any more. Or less for that matter.
We have a weatherman out here in ABQ whose surname is Stiff. Imagine what he endured!
I suggest congressional hearings on dangerously false reporting in wartime, as well as the Pentagon review process.
What makes you think they're naive? Personlly, I think they work rather diligently in trying to rouse the rabble against American foreign policy and sully our good name.
Somehow, coverage of the Newsweek story has taken as fact that Newsweek is responsible for muslim rioting and muslim violence and muslim deaths. No. Newsweek may have reported in error (big surprise), but muslims are the only ones responsible for their behavior. Such out of control antics seem a clear indication of a sad place on the ladder of brain evolution. Pitiful, just pitiful. It may be time for the news media to shine a bright light on that desperate muslim mentality and to identify it for what it is: a blind, hate-filled effort to preserve its last excuse for failure. Or do the 24/7 news stations prefer to advance the notion that the Koran, above and beyond all other books ever written on the planet, Earth, must be protected and safeguarded against even a hint of abuse or disregard? If that be their position, it may be time for some serious full speed wake-up slaps!
As someone pointed out, why are we givin them frickin korans in the first place? They get their energy from it. We should be giving them bibles and making them read it so they can learn another way.
Given the press's penchant for reporting the latest war death toll (all Bush's fault of course), it is time to turn the tables and begin:
The Newsweek Death Toll: 16 dead, 100 injured. Updates surely to come.
I completely understand your position and personally I don't care what Muslims do to each other as a result of their inability to act rationally and with some sense of human respect for themselves and others. I also agree that to apologize, whether the story is true or not, elevates Islam and the Koran to a false superiority. However, I do think Newsweek should be held accountable for the danger it needlessly placed our troops and national interests in.
Regards
Yeah, I'm watching Brit Hume now...there was even a suggestion the Pentagon was responsible because it failed to show the story wasn't true before it was published...over course the person making the comment was caught in the logical problem of how do you prove a negative? You can't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.