Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek sparks global riots with one paragraph on Koran
TIMESONLINE ^ | May 14, 2005 | Catherine Philp

Posted on 05/13/2005 10:02:56 PM PDT by mcenedo

Claim that the Holy book was defiled by US guards at Guantanamo Bay has incensed Muslims

Demonstrators show the depth of anti-American feeling in Islamabad after the Newsweek report (REUTERS)

AT LEAST nine people were killed yesterday as a wave of anti-American demonstrations swept the Islamic world from the Gaza Strip to the Java Sea, sparked by a single paragraph in a magazine alleging that US military interrogators had desecrated the Koran.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bias; cary; enemywithin; fifthcolumn; gitmo; korandesecration; media; medialies; mikethespikeisikoff; newsweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: putupjob

The writers were Michael Isikoff and John Barry. I've been surfing all evening trying to find the original article.. seems Newsweek has it handily tucked away, and if you'll notice, all the articles online about it leave out the authors names (those dudes really stick together, don't ya think?)

Anyway, for you and anyone interested.. i finally found a link to the article on Roger L. Simon's blog..

http://www.rogerlsimon.com/mt-archives/2005/05/299_words_from.php

The title of the article is Gitmo:SouthCom Showdown

The paragraph reads as follows:

"May 9 issue - Investigators probing interrogation abuses at the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay have confirmed some infractions alleged in internal FBI e-mails that surfaced late last year. Among the previously unreported cases, sources tell NEWSWEEK: interrogators, in an attempt to rattle suspects, flushed a Qur'an down a toilet and led a detainee around with a collar and dog leash. An Army spokesman confirms that 10 Gitmo interrogators have already been disciplined for mistreating prisoners, including one woman who took off her top, rubbed her finger through a detainee's hair and sat on the detainee's lap. (New details of sexual abuse—including an instance in which a female interrogator allegedly wiped her red-stained hand on a detainee's face, telling him it was her menstrual blood—are also in a new book to be published this week by a former Gitmo translator.)"

You think all this is just a leadup to some flunky's "NEW BOOK"? This is where they got their 'facts' from???

~mugged~


22 posted on 05/14/2005 12:09:40 AM PDT by southerngirlbybirth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: expatguy
Im still in shock over what I heard from Condoleeza Rice.

For those who missed it:


23 posted on 05/14/2005 12:20:33 AM PDT by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gelato
Nothing wrong with what she said it makes Newsweak look even worse. Do you think any Newsweak journalist will be fired over the unnecessary deaths cause ?
24 posted on 05/14/2005 12:25:06 AM PDT by John Lenin (History teaches that wars begin when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mcenedo

LOL!


25 posted on 05/14/2005 12:26:25 AM PDT by strategofr (One if by land, two if by sea, three if by the Internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mcenedo

Can our military people use Newsweek personnel as human shields?


26 posted on 05/14/2005 12:27:04 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

"What's more, Newsweek including its senior editors knew the likely reaction in the Muslim world and they still went ahead and did it. Everyone with a kid in Iraq or Afghanistan should press to put these irresponsible anti-Americans out of business. Might start a writing campaign to some advertisers. Mine will be in the mail tomorrow."

Maybe you've got something there. We all make general statements about the MSM and the damage they do, but this is much more specifically damaging than usual. Perhaps we Conservatives can "hang onto" this one.

I don't know hoe though. The only way I know to spread an idea is to post something on FR.


27 posted on 05/14/2005 12:29:10 AM PDT by strategofr (One if by land, two if by sea, three if by the Internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Nothing wrong with what she said......

Except that it is extremely sloppy. The United States will not TOLERATE disrespect for the Koran? Quite the ridiculous overstatement.

The full statement:

Secretary Condoleezza Rice
Remarks before Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs
Washington, DC
May 12, 2005

(2:20 p.m. EDT)

Mr. Chairman, before I begin my actual testimony, I want to speak directly to Muslims in America and throughout the world. Disrespect for the Holy Koran is not now, nor has it ever been, nor will it ever be, tolerated by the United States. We honor the sacred books of all the world's great religions. Disrespect for the Holy Koran is abhorrent to us all.

There have been recent allegations about disrespect for the Holy Koran by interrogators at Guantanamo Bay and that has deeply offended many people. Our military authorities are investigating these allegations fully. If they are proven true, we will take appropriate action. Respect for the religious freedom of all individuals is one of the founding principles of the United States. The protection of a person's right to worship freely and without harassment is a principle that the government and the people of the United States take very seriously. Guaranteeing religious rights is of great personal importance to the President and to me.

During the past few days, we have heard from our Muslim friends around the world about their concerns on this matter. We understand and we share their concerns. Sadly, some people have lost their lives in violent demonstrations. I am asking that all our friends around the world reject incitement to violence by those who would mischaracterize our intentions.

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee.
From this statement, it appears Secretary Rice is saying that it violates someone's religious rights to simply witness the disposal of a religious book.
28 posted on 05/14/2005 12:37:31 AM PDT by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Gelato
Respect for the religious freedom of all individuals is one of the founding principles of the United States.

You can't argue with that.
29 posted on 05/14/2005 12:40:20 AM PDT by John Lenin (History teaches that wars begin when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Brimack34

All the dems care about is winning elections, something they havent done in about 10 years, at any cost, they are filth for putting my son in more danger than he already has.

Go get em Marines


30 posted on 05/14/2005 12:42:12 AM PDT by skimask (I only fly on planes with two right wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: putupjob

Bingo. Resume and ego builder.


31 posted on 05/14/2005 12:43:53 AM PDT by dennisw (the country music station plays soft but there’s nothing, really nothing to turn off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Respect for the religious freedom of all individuals is one of the founding principles of the United States. You can't argue with that.

Does that include the religious right to reject and disrepect the Koran, in whatever way a person deems appropriate?

32 posted on 05/14/2005 12:44:22 AM PDT by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gelato

I'm not going to argue, she did what any good government official should do. She has Muslim allies that she is working with.


33 posted on 05/14/2005 12:50:26 AM PDT by John Lenin (History teaches that wars begin when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mcenedo
Newsweek's plan: inspire and incite Muslims to hate Americans and to kill US civilian and soldiers living abroad. Their motive is clear. Their tactic is the big lie. Why do Americans buy this rag?
34 posted on 05/14/2005 12:59:00 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Hezbollah will disarm before we see Kerry sign his SF 180,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
I'm not going to argue, she did what any good government official should do. She has Muslim allies that she is working with.

Sloppy, sweeping overstatements hardly serve any good purpose, especially when they are meant to boost our credibility in the eyes of an already skeptical Muslim world.

Her response is exaggerated and unhelpful.

35 posted on 05/14/2005 1:01:32 AM PDT by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; MikeA
Newsweak likes terrorists better than America.

Think of it this way:

By printing the flimsiest and most spurious of untenable rumors, Newsweek has caused whackjob junior jihadis to go on (yet another) mini-autogenocide within their own ranks. Good.

In fact, I propose that Newsweek run weekly bogus accounts of alleged insults toward Might Mo, in the hope that more and more jihadis will jump off tall buildings and stone themselves silly.

Newsweek has unintentionally done the civilized world a great public service.

36 posted on 05/14/2005 1:02:29 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: putupjob

Not much of a resume builder if the advertisers are notified they have one month to pull all ads from the magazine or face boycott, imo.


37 posted on 05/14/2005 1:07:13 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Grant no power to government you would not want your worst enemies to wield against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

Do you think these liberal elitists rat pieces of crap give a care about what they print. Just as long as it hurts America is all they care about.

Ditto; someone needs to explain to Newsweak what "lose lips sinks ships" really means.


38 posted on 05/14/2005 1:29:17 AM PDT by raisincane (Addicted to FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
The protection of a person's right to worship freely and without harassment is a principle that the government and the people of the United States take very seriously.

She forgets that _none_ of the old standards apply post-911. We used to take some silly thing called habeas corpus seriously too. But anyone who would let some antiquated Magna Carta get in our way of indefinately detaining someone is giving aid and comfort to terrorists! ;>)

39 posted on 05/14/2005 1:45:02 AM PDT by Petronius (Hunter: Shine On You Crazy Diamond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

I think you are onto something.


40 posted on 05/14/2005 1:46:19 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (The minutemen are 'vigilantes' doncha know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson