Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chaplain Wants Christ Out of Air Force Academy
NewsMax ^ | 5/12/05 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 05/12/2005 12:41:32 PM PDT by wagglebee

Here’s a story that will throw you for a loop: a "chaplain” at the U.S. Air Force Academy is complaining that the school’s administration has a "systemic and pervasive” problem of promoting religious religious values with a Christian bent.

The chaplain, Capt. Melinda Morton, a "Lutheran minister” spoke out publicly on Tuesday as an Air Force task force arrived at the academy to investigate charges that officers and staff members pushed their religious beliefs on cadets.

And she claimed that a tolerance program developed at the academy, called Respecting the Spiritual Values of all People (R.S.V.P.), was watered down after it was shown to officers.

Maj. Gen. Charles C. Baldwin, chief of chaplains for the Air Force, screened the 90-minute R.S.V.P. film in October, according to Capt. Morton, and asked her: "Why is it that the Christians never win?” in reaction to some of the program’s depictions of cadet interactions.

"Chaplain” Morton’s complaints about too much religion at the military academy is creating waves, and earned her hero status in a report in the New York Times Thursday.

Gen. Baldwin acknowledged in an interview that he felt too many scenes in the film portrayed Christians at fault for excessive evangelical proselytizing.

He also said he asked that the Air Force cut segments on non-Christian religions such as Buddhism, Judaism and Native American spirituality.

The problem in dealing with proselytizing and church-state issues at the academy, he explained, "always is, when is a person crossing the line, or when are they being a positive person of faith, like our president.”

Last year, the Colorado Springs academy invited Yale Divinity School professor Kristen Leslie and six Yale graduate students to visit the school and observe how the chaplains minister to the cadets.

A memo from the Yale team cited the "stridently evangelical themes” at a worship service attended by 600 new cadets.

Leslie said a chaplain urged cadets to pray for those who didn’t attend and "remind them of the consequences ... those not ‘born again will burn in the fires of hell.’”

But academy spokesman Johnny Whitaker disputed that account, saying several other chaplains told him that no one mentioned burning "in the fires of hell.”

Morton, a 48-year-old "Lutheran minister," said she was removed from her post as executive officer to the chief chaplain, Col. Michael Whittington, last week. She claimed the dismissal came after he pressured her to deny details of what happened at the religious service.

But Whitaker said Whittington sent Morton an e-mail on May 4 saying he was removing her "to ensure a smooth and complete transition” for new leaders.

Morgan said she had stepped forward because "it’s the Constitution, not just a nice rule we can follow or not follow. That includes not using your power to advance your religious agenda.”

She acknowledged that after speaking out, "I don’t think I have much future in the Air Force.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 666; airfarce; airforce; airforceacademy; antichrist; antitheist; apostacy; apostate; butch; butchdykes; chaplain; christianity; churchandstate; coloradosprings; dyke; dykes; elca; feminazi; feminazis; feminism; feminist; feminists; lesbian; lesbians; lutheran; lutherans; methodist; methodists; purge; radicalfeminism; sac; usaf; usafa; usairforce; wcc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 381-390 next last
Comment #301 Removed by Moderator

Comment #302 Removed by Moderator

To: Marshal Zhukov; Admin Moderator

You waltz in here and bitch about the "unaccountable" religious right, call us vile, and expect to stick around?


Why did you delete your proud masonic self-identification?


303 posted on 05/13/2005 10:16:02 AM PDT by Petronski (Pope Benedict XVI: A German Shepherd on the Throne of Peter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Marshal Zhukov

Jesus is still not PC.......regardless of what you think...


304 posted on 05/13/2005 10:16:05 AM PDT by marmar (Even though I may look different then you...my blood runs red, white and blue.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Marshal Zhukov

Buh Bye!


305 posted on 05/13/2005 10:16:53 AM PDT by Search4Truth (When a man lies he murders some part of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Marshal Zhukov

Farewell, creep.


306 posted on 05/13/2005 10:17:04 AM PDT by Petronski (Pope Benedict XVI: A German Shepherd on the Throne of Peter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
They've got the April Fools' edition of How to Win Friends and Influence People.
307 posted on 05/13/2005 10:21:03 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Marshal Zhukov
Pony up and prove it.
  1. ELCA Synods Approve Gay Blessings. At Spring 2000 synod assemblies several synods have approved of blessing same-sex unions: Greater Milwaukee (Bishop Peter Rogness) voted 141-103 to approve blessings of same-sex unions. Southeast Michigan (Bishop Robert Rimbo) voted (approximately 55-60%) to approve blessings of same sex unions. Metro Chicago (Bishop Kenneth Olsen) voted 296-208 to approve blessings of same-sex unions, and 263-239 to ordain homosexuals with partners. Sierra Pacific (Bishop Robert Mattheis) adopted a resolution asking the bishop to withdraw sanctions from University Lutheran Chapel in Berkeley for hiring Jeff Johnson, a practicing homosexual, and to restore funding to the Lutheran University Chapel. Virginia (Bishop James Mauney) resolved to begin a time of prayer, study, and conversation on the subject of blessing same-sex unions. Northeastern Ohio (Bishop Marcus Miller) voted 171-138 to ask the ELCA to establish a new Commission on Sexual Minorities. Northern Great Lakes (Bishop Thomas Skrenes) and Southeastern Minnesota (Bishop Glen Nyckelmoe) voted to study the issue of homosexuality. Southern Ohio (Bishop C. Holloway, Jr.) defeated a resolution to become a Reconciled In Christ synod.
  2. MeLinda Morton studied theology at Seminex in the early 1980s. ... Ordained thereafter, MeLinda has served as ELCA Interim Pastor in smallish congregations. Currently she's at one near the Texas - New Mexico border. In, with, and under all of this she's been involved in two graduate programs. One is law, the $ecular kind, with her J.D. degree coming next month. Second is a doctoral program in systematic theology at Lutheran School of Theology in Chicago
  3. The ELCA has decided to address the issue of homosexuality. What guidance does the Bible give on this question?
    I’m glad you asked. The answer is complicated. First of all, the biblical passages that speak about this question are few in number. Jesus never mentions the subject, one way or another. And where the Bible does discuss it, there are always issues of interpretation or other extenuating circumstances. We are faced with many challenges in deciding what these passages meant and what they might mean today.

    But does not the Bible condemn Sodom precisely because of homosexuality? That’s why certain homosexual actions are called Sodomy.
    God told Abraham that the sin of Sodom was very grave, without going into details (Gen 18:20), and much later the prophet Ezekiel accused Sodom of pride, excess of food, prosperous ease and failure to take care of the poor and needy (16:49). When the two angels visited Lot in Sodom, all the men of the city threatened them with homosexual rape. That’s why God struck them with blindness. Clearly, homosexual and heterosexual rape are wrong and sinful, perhaps expressing violence as much as lust. No one ever claimed that heterosexual rape made heterosexual sex wrong. That’s why this story doesn’t address modern homosexuality, which we assume is participated in by consenting adults.

308 posted on 05/13/2005 10:34:12 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

DU would welcome you to the Matriarchy with open arms ...



or is that limp wrists ?

309 posted on 05/13/2005 10:39:11 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Does the Air Force have some sort of institutional proselyzation requirement?

Unfortunately it does

Don't Ask. Don't Tell.

310 posted on 05/13/2005 10:48:53 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
More amazing brilliance from that link you posted:

Q: But doesn’t he condemn people for choosing to be homosexual? Paul says they “exchanged” one form of intercourse for another.

A: Yes, but, since the late 19th century, Western science has observed that some people are primarily or even exclusively attracted sexually only to people of their same gender. We call this “sexual orientation.” No one fully understands the reasons for this: Is orientation the result of nature (genetics) or nurture (upbringing) or a combination of both nature and nurture and other things? Whatever the reason for their orientation, people do not choose to be gay or lesbian; they simply are that.

This is what the semenaries are spewing today.
Is it any wonder the churches are full of blind guides?
311 posted on 05/13/2005 11:28:57 AM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Please do not try to put words in my mouth. You seem to be claiming to know all of Christ's plan. I'm not so sure that it is quite as cut & dried as you are trying to make it.

That is the way it always was, so therefore, that is the way is should always be, right? Care to explain Huldah and Deborah to me?


312 posted on 05/13/2005 11:33:27 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: epow
Just because it has been done before doesn't make it right.

True.

Paul's epistles contain numerous instructions to the early churches regarding the qualifications of pastors, bishops, and other church offices. In every instance he mentioned only men as being qualified for those positions of authority.

Also true.

In his 1st epistle to Timothy Paul specifically rejected the idea of placing women in positions of authority in the church. The pastorate is certainly a position of authority, therefore any church or denomination which ordains women as pastors is deliberately ignoring the clear teaching of the word of God on that issue.

Luke 24:10 & 11 might help you understand why.

God designed two distinctly different genders for different roles in life. That doesn't mean the he loves one gender more than the other, or that one's role is less important than the other's. It does mean that God is sovereign and that he makes the rules for his Church, whether we think those rules are "fair" or not.

This is not about "fair" to me. It is about misuse of God's authority, regardless of whether that misuse is being done by a man or a woman.

313 posted on 05/13/2005 11:58:53 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly; epow
It is about misuse of God's authority, regardless of whether that misuse is being done by a man or a woman.

Agreed. And placing a woman in spiritual authority over men is an outrageous misuse of that authority.

314 posted on 05/13/2005 12:14:36 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: XR7

There is only one spiritual authority over me. NO human is qualified.


315 posted on 05/13/2005 12:19:17 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

IMO, that was not called for.


316 posted on 05/13/2005 12:20:44 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: XR7

The funny thing is I would not even have bothered to find links to support my instincts had the Russian Marshall not challenged me to "pony up." I've read all this nonsense before. They are simply not "blind guides" because they are willful and wanton.


317 posted on 05/13/2005 12:22:07 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
IMO, that was not called for.

Was "this" called for ?

Okay, who called for "this" ?
"That" is jealous.

318 posted on 05/13/2005 12:26:31 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
Was "this" called for ?

Course not.

Okay, who called for "this" ?

Me, thus the "IMO".

"That" is jealous.

Huh?

319 posted on 05/13/2005 12:29:35 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
Huh?

I assumed you would figure it out. When you wrote your comments you did not reference any other comments so I, and probably others, have no idea what your really mean IYHO ...

320 posted on 05/13/2005 12:30:49 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 381-390 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson