Posted on 05/12/2005 4:35:56 AM PDT by mike6181
PRESS RELEASE
For Immediate Release: Contact: Josh Holly or Harald Stavenas
May 11, 2005 (202) 225-2539
Armed Services Committee Prohibits Women in Combat
Washington , D.C. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter (R-CA) today defended the line of demarcation that the Military Personnel Subcommittee established with respect to women in combat support units. An amendment was offered this afternoon by Subcommittee Chairman John McHugh (R-NY) at Hunters request.
Hunters statement is as follows:
The Forward Support Companies under the new Army modularization will be called upon to move into battle to support combat forces. Rocket-propelled grenades, machine gun fire and all the other deadly aspects of war will make no distinction between women and men on the front lines.
The nation should not put women into the front lines of combat. In my judgment, we will cross that line soon unless we make a policy decision as we design the new Army.
Forward Support Companies go forward into battle. That is why they are labeled forward support companies. This in no way forecloses hundreds of defense specialties for women away from the live fire of todays battle field.
The American people have never wanted to have women in combat and this reaffirms that policy.
###
There are no front lines in Iraq
Hunter is blowing smoke. He nor anyone else can define the battlefield.
BTW, Duncan, are female Blackhawk and Apache pilots restricted from combat?
bttt
This should be interesting....I guess this will have to mean that no women will be allowed in Iraq or Afghanistan...there is no safe place in either country...
Like I said, he's blowin' smoke.
You cannot have politicans defining a battlefield.....Mike(hubby) just said this means there can't be women in AVN...no pilots..
I agree. Besides, Hunter can't decree anything.
ROFL
Last fall a female blackhawk pilot, in my hubby's BN, was shot down by an RPG...she was not on a *combat mission*...nonetheless, she lost both legs...
His ammendment should have gone on to mandate real world physical test to assure that soldiers deploying at the division level can at least road march, manage one end of a two man litter and evacuate the average size soldier 100 meters using a carry method. That alone would effectively eliminate 80-90% of females from combat service. See the 1992 report on women in combat for more stats. For those interested in the subject, it makes for enlightening reading.
I've heard Bob Dole talk about her after visiting her at Walter Reed. She wants to get back in the cockpit.
A very brave woman and a credit to the 106th AVN BN.....I don't know if she'll ever fly again, we'll see..
Two more questions might be; Were they selected as aviators because ROTC/USMA/OCS have a policy of selecting a minimum number of female cadets to be aviators regardless of whether there are more highly qualified males? and; Are those female pilots physically capable of extracting an average size soldier from their copilots seat?
Hunters problem is that he is applying standards from his two tours with elite units in Vietnam to an army that has dropped standards and applied quotas to most--though not all --units....and there are some soldiers that fully support the quotas and reduced standards. He is also dealing with folks who honestly believe that a relatively few insurgents equate to the type of enemy he fought in Vietnam.
Hi, armyboy....how's the navy treating you?...Mike is no longer F Co's 1sg...he was transferred to E Co.....big shake ups in Illinois..all senior NCO's being transferred...hmmmmmmm!
And it's the way America fights wars now that front lines don't really exist.
Could this mean that women will not be permitted forward of pre-war staging areas....in the case of Iraq that would be Kuwait.
Not foward of Corps Support Areas? Division Support Areas?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.