So which theory better explains self-replicating robotic origins: Evolution or Intelligent Design?
Posted on 05/11/2005 1:51:36 PM PDT by John Jorsett
Scientists have created a robot that can replicate itself in minutes. The team behind the machine says the experiment shows that self- reproduction is not unique to living organisms
The researchers add that the ability could be harnessed to drive major advances in nanotechnology, the science of the very small, and may even lead to space colonization by robots.
Developed by researchers at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, the machine was constructed from cube-shaped robotic units (modules) that functioned independently. A four-module robot could assemble an exact replica of itself in just two and a half minutes.
Writing for tomorrow's issue of the science journal Nature, the researchers say the plastic robotic cubes each contained a microprocessor, a motor, and electromagnets. The cubes were split diagonally into two halves, allowing the cubes to swivel to change position or move objects.
Each cube was preprogrammed with building instructions, says Hod Lipson, an assistant professor at Cornell's department of mechanical and aerospace engineering and department of computing and information science.
"The cubes are aware of contact and release events [with other cubes] and of the order in which they were assembled," he said.
Lipson says the robot can do little but self-reproduce. But he notes that it would be fairly easy to add modules with grippers, cameras, or other specialized equipment.
The researcher adds that, while the robot is a relatively simple device, it strengthens the case of scientists who believe self-reproduction isn't unique to living organisms and that in the future machines will be able to clone themselves.
If so, the implications for some fields, including nanotechnology and space exploration, could be huge.
"Consider a robotic mission to a remote planet," Lipson said. "If a traditional robot is sent and it breaks, the mission is over. But if modular robots are sent over with a supply of materials, and a fault happens, they may be able to self-repair."
Recycling Robots
The researcher suggests such robots could adapt to solve problems.
"If a new, unforeseen task emerges, a robot might construct a new, more suitable robot from scratch, and then the new robot will dismantle the old robot," he said. "These kinds of scenarios, where machines sustain themselves and adapt by consuming and recycling components, get a little closer to the way biology works."
The prevailing view holds that self-replication is an ability that organisms or objects either have in full or lack entirely. But Lipson's team theorizes that self-replication isn't a yes-or-no proposition, but exists at varying degrees.
The researchers present their new robot as an example of this theory.
The team says the extent to which something is self-replicating depends on many factors. For example, mineral crystals build exact replicas of themselves, but only in a solution. By contrast, rabbits reproduce themselves less accurately than crystals do but are less dependent on a specific environment.
Through understanding the principles of self-replication in nature, the team aims to make robots that are more robust and adaptive.
"We are interested in making a practical robot that can self-reproduce but also do something useful," Lipson said. "We are also interested in making these machines at microscale."
Nanotechnology involves the precise manipulation of atoms and molecules to create structures around the scale of one billionth of a meter. Proponents say this fast-expanding field, seen by some as the next industrial revolution, could potentially change the way almost everything is manufactured, from medicines to automobiles.
More advanced nanotechnology could see the creation of nanomachines. For instance, so-called nanobots could be programmed to attack and reconstruct the cells of cancer patients or perform surgeries a thousand times more precise than currently possible.
Low-Cost Production
A crucial objective of nanotechnology is to make products inexpensively, says Ralph Merckle, a professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology's College of Computing in Atlanta.
"While the ability to make a few very small, very precise molecular machines very expensively would clearly be a major scientific achievement, it would not fundamentally change how we make most products," he said.
What's needed, he says, are huge numbers of robots working together at a molecular scale. Self-replication is seen as a way of achieving this, using nanobots that can create copies of themselves to form vast numbers of microscopic assemblers.
Such a scenario has sparked fears among environmentalists and others who have warned of an apocalyptic "gray goo" event, with self-replicating nanobots possibly running amok and consuming the planet in a matter of days.
Indeed, researchers at Rice University in Texas recently reported that nanosize buckyballs (soccer ball-shaped carbon molecules) are water soluble and can interfere with the respiration of soil microbes.
And last year scientists at Southern Methodist University, also in Texas, reported that those same molecules, often used in nanotechnology, cause brain damage in certain fish.
Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, is one of the more visible public figures to voice concerns over the potentially "enormous environmental and social risks" of nanotechnology.
However, proponents counter that the risks associated with self-replicating machines have been much exaggerated.
"Artificial self-replication is already a risk when it comes to computer viruses and genetically modified crops," Lipson, the Cornell researcher, said. "I think that mechanical self-replication is far down the priority list. There are plenty of other things to worry about before this."
Human reproduction is a lot more fun.
Robots master reproduction: Modular machine assembles copies of itself in minutes
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1401173/posts
Just wait. These robots will be on welfare soon.
Interesting except it's being done in Ithaca...the City of Evil...Do the robots look like Hillary? Are they wearing black pantsuits?
They're too close to human already.
Bah! I hate it when someone beats me to the punchline!
Great, someday I'll have kids that will eat me when I get old :(
"If a new, unforeseen task emerges, a robot might construct a new, more suitable robot from scratch, and then the new robot will dismantle the old robot,"
That's the winner.
No!!No!!!Beware the clones!!!!Beware the Clones. It's the end of mankind as we know it. Star Wars was right! The Matrix was right. WE'RE DOOMED.
The ID folks would point out that, while the robot in question isn't alive, it is the product of an intentional design process.
Me, I think we're starting on a course that will blur the line dividing life from non-life.
So, who stops them from reproducing when they start to outnumber us?????
As long as they repair my house, do my yardwork, and cook my meals, I don't have a problem with 'em. =]
John Conner.
-PJ
"Tribles!"
So which theory better explains self-replicating robotic origins: Evolution or Intelligent Design?
I think the whole experiment is BS. Of course a machine can produce a robot or any other device. If you want to place the production capacity inside the robot, ok. And of course robots could be designed to repair themselves or one another. The automotive plants are big mommy robots producing little baby cars. Sounds like a nice research boondoggle bet this guy built himself a big house with the grant (utilizing human laborers of course).
I feel like I am a cyborg already, with the amount of time I spend hooked up to a computer.
I am anxiously awaiting little nanobots that can scour our blood and body for impurities or wayward cells. I really want to live forever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.