Skip to comments.
Centrifugal weapon could deliver stealth firepower
New Scientist ^
| 5/11/05
| Will Knight
Posted on 05/11/2005 1:07:57 PM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-187 next last
To: LibWhacker
2
posted on
05/11/2005 1:09:38 PM PDT
by
Rakkasan1
(The MRS wanted to go to an expensive place to eat so I took her to the gas station.)
To: Rakkasan1
No bang, just whoosh!...........
3
posted on
05/11/2005 1:12:30 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(I woke up this morning and discovered my Memory Foam mattress had Alzheimer's......)
To: LibWhacker
A former co-worker of mine who is a brilliant engineer described a similar idea to me a number of times. I guess he should have gone for a patent.
To: LibWhacker
Well, the ammunition is cheap. ;)
5
posted on
05/11/2005 1:13:06 PM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
To: LibWhacker
That's pretty effing cool.
To: LibWhacker
"Anything that seems so far beyond anything else is worth a moment's thought before you completely gulp it down," he told New Scientist. "It is way out on the side of the scale that deals with high levels of imagination.The history of the 20th Century is the history of the implausible made real. The history of the 21st Century will be the history of the impossible made real....
7
posted on
05/11/2005 1:15:17 PM PDT
by
freebilly
(Go Santa Cruz Baseball!)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: Darth Reagan
It's all ball bearings these days. Ping
9
posted on
05/11/2005 1:16:04 PM PDT
by
marblehead17
(I love it when a plan comes together.)
To: LibWhacker
I'm always intrigued by new defence projects, this would be nice for our boys to use in the WOT.
10
posted on
05/11/2005 1:16:06 PM PDT
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: LibWhacker
This idea was described in Popular Science about 42 years ago. They even had plans for a prototype you could build.
I remember because my father got me a stack of Pop. Science from a friend of his at work, when I was in about third grade. This particular project stands out in my memory.
(steely)
11
posted on
05/11/2005 1:16:06 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Fortunately, the Bill of Rights doesn't include the word 'is'.)
To: LibWhacker
Do the ball bearings vomit when released?
To: Eaker; humblegunner; Flyer
Eaker has a new project.
Someone be sure to get pictures...
13
posted on
05/11/2005 1:19:12 PM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: LibWhacker
Hillary and the leftists are not going to like this.
14
posted on
05/11/2005 1:19:42 PM PDT
by
garyhope
To: LibWhacker
The video at the site says there's no recoil. That must mean that mass leaves in at least two directions. If the recoil is very small then there is very little mass projected, the exit velocity is small, the weapon mass is great, or some combination of the above.
Nothing in the centrifugal concept would allow them to violate f=ma.
15
posted on
05/11/2005 1:19:46 PM PDT
by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: LibWhacker
I followed the link to the original source, but couldn't play the video.
;-(
Does this mean that in California, all ball bearings will require a serial number?
16
posted on
05/11/2005 1:20:06 PM PDT
by
white trash redneck
(Everything I needed to know about Islam I learned on 9-11-01.)
To: LibWhacker
Sounds like one of those machines that "pitches" baseballs in a batting cage with two spinning discs slinging the ball towards the batter. Just scaled down for ball bearings, and then industrialized for the military.
To: LibWhacker
If you go to military.com for 5/10/05 you can see a picture of the weapon and a good article.
18
posted on
05/11/2005 1:20:32 PM PDT
by
nidan
To: LibWhacker
geez, that's into a range around 15 kHz! Not so much a whoosh as a ring!
19
posted on
05/11/2005 1:20:35 PM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(Don't bother giving me liberty - I'll take it for myself.)
To: Imaverygooddriver
Shooting a round ball, I would think it would not be overly accurrate or have much of a range in the atmospher.
Think round shot vs. rifle shot.
Be handy spaceship-to-spaceship weapon, though --- handy to destroy satelites.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson