Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inquiry finds evidence of fraud in election
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ^ | 05/11/05 | Greg Borowski

Posted on 05/11/2005 6:52:06 AM PDT by ninenot

Inquiry finds evidence of fraud in election

Cast ballots outnumber voters by 4,609

By GREG J. BOROWSKI
gborowski@journalsentinel.com
Posted: May 10, 2005

Investigators said Tuesday they found clear evidence of fraud in the Nov. 2 election in Milwaukee, including more than 200 cases of felons voting illegally and more than 100 people who voted twice, used fake names or false addresses or voted in the name of a dead person.

Advertisement

Officials said charges will be filed in coming weeks, as individual cases are reviewed and more evidence is gathered.

Nonetheless, it is likely that many - perhaps most - of those who committed fraud won't face prosecution because city records are so sloppy that it will be difficult to establish cases that will stand up in court.

And even now, three months after the investigation, officials have not been able to close a gap of 7,000 votes, with more ballots cast than voters listed. Officials said the gap remains at 4,609.

U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic likened it to trying to prove "a bank embezzlement if the bank cannot tell how much money was there in the first place."

Biskupic announced the preliminary findings at a news conference, along with Milwaukee County District Attorney E. Michael McCann, who is also overseeing the joint inquiry.

Tuesday's announcement comes after a Journal Sentinel investigation that found widespread problems with the election in the city, including that the election totals themselves were not double-checked by city and county panels charged with doing so.

Some of the problems identified by the newspaper, such as spotty compliance with procedures to verify same-day registrants, are broader and are the subject of a statewide audit approved by lawmakers.

Tuesday's announcement could breathe new life into the Republican-backed photo ID debate, which did not survive a veto from Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle and might instead eventually go to voters as a proposed constitutional amendment.

A photo ID requirement might have caught some of the problems highlighted in Tuesday's preliminary report. It notes cases of people voting in the name of a dead person or as someone else. Investigators located some people listed as voting who said they did not vote.

In other cases, according to Tuesday's report, people "registered and voted with identities and addresses that cannot in any way be linked to a real person."

Officials did not identify how many fit each category.

Investigators have focused only on the City of Milwaukee in reviewing duplicate-voting offenses. Officials said Tuesday, though, that they would expand the review of felons voting illegally to Milwaukee suburbs.

The newspaper found at least 278 felons who voted statewide, though only a partial review could be completed because of a state law that bars public access to birthdates of voters.

Tracking illegal votes

The fraud investigation has focused on the more than 70,000 people who registered to vote on election day, not the other 200,000-plus voters. That is because registration cards provide a paper trail, which officials said would be stronger in court than computerized records.

It is unclear what identification these 100-plus people provided at the polls to register. State law allows utility bills and leases to be used or for one voter to vouch for another.

Biskupic, appointed by a Republican, and McCann, a Democrat, said they had pledged to avoid partisanship in the matter and avoided questions relating to reforms and proposals.

The announcement, though, prompted renewed calls for photo ID from Republicans, while Doyle pushed again for his set of reforms, which he said would do more to tackle specific problems.

For instance, investigators found "deputy registrars" working for registration drives had submitted at least 65 fake names, though no one apparently voted from the addresses. Doyle's plan would prohibit offering financial incentives, such as paying by the signature, in such drives.

In Madison, Doyle said a photo ID requirement is unnecessary. He urged prosecution of any offenders.

"I don't think many people, if they know there are real consequences for voting twice, and that there have been prosecutions for voting twice, are going to do it because the risk of being caught and the penalty far outweighs the advantage of casting one extra vote," Doyle said.

In response to the findings, Sen. Joe Leibham (R-Sheboygan) said as early as next month he would advance a bill similar to the one vetoed by Doyle. It also could be part of the recommendations from a Legislative Council task force that has been meeting on reforms.

While Doyle has argued the measure would make Wisconsin one of the strictest states in the nation, very few other states allow same-day registration.

Assembly Speaker John Gard (R-Peshtigo) said if Doyle again vetoes the requirement, he would move to make it part of the state constitution, a two-year process that requires a statewide referendum but does not require the approval of the governor.

"The next presidential election in Wisconsin, I guarantee you'll need a photo ID to vote," said Gard, who is running for the U.S. House. "I'll get this done if it is the last thing I do around here."

U.S. Rep. Mark Green, a Green Bay Republican who has introduced a national photo ID requirement, said: "People are having their faith in the election system shaken. This news will make it much, much worse."

Green is running for governor, as is Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker, who also backs a photo ID requirement.

"Clearly, there is proof that fraud took place in the November 2 election," Walker said.

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett attended the news conference, an unusual occurrence for an announcement by prosecutors.

From the start, Barrett said he welcomed the inquiry but also noted at several points in recent months that he had seen no hard evidence of fraud in the system.

He acknowledged Tuesday the findings pointed to fraud and said again "any individual who committed fraud (should) be prosecuted."

Asked if a photo ID requirement would have made a difference, he said it would not have prevented felons from voting and would have had little impact on other problems.

Biskupic said there was no indication of a widespread conspiracy to commit voter fraud, or of any knowledge or involvement by poll workers or any other city officials.

The city's record-keeping problems meant investigators from the FBI and Milwaukee Police Department have logged more than 1,000 hours reviewing the 70,000 same-day registration cards, including 1,300 that could not be processed because of missing names, addresses and other information.

Indeed, about 100 cards described as "of interest to investigators" cannot be located, officials said. And within the past few weeks, police found a previously lost box of the cards at the Election Commission offices.

Biskupic and McCann said they remain troubled that three months after the investigation began that city officials have been unable to account for a gap of about 4,600 votes, with more ballots counted than people listed as voting.

That reflects a new assessment of the 7,000-vote gap first identified by the Journal Sentinel. Although city election officials initially blamed postelection data entry for the flaws, the newspaper found gaps existed at dozens of wards, with more votes counted than people tallied in log books.

The gap has been narrowed to 4,600 by a closer review of election day logs and other records, which authorities placed off-limits to the newspaper during the investigation.

McCann said: "I will not be satisfied if we cannot uncover that - what the explanation is, or a reasonable explanation."

In all, about 277,000 people in Milwaukee voted in the election. Thus, the cases identified in the investigation constitute a small portion of the total vote.

The findings, however, carry extra significance in a state that had an 11,000-vote margin in the presidential contest, one of the closest in the nation.

Democrat John Kerry topped President Bush in Wisconsin, mainly because of Kerry's margin in Milwaukee and Madison.

Had a larger state, such as Ohio, gone the other way, it could have led to a Florida-style recount here that would have turned on many of the issues that instead were left for the newspaper to uncover in its extensive investigation.

The federal-local investigation was launched Jan. 26, a day after the Journal Sentinel reported that some 1,200 votes in the November election came from invalid addresses.

Among other findings, some 1,300 same-day registration cards were processed by poll workers who allowed people to vote even though the cards were incomplete. Some 548 had no address listed and 48 gave no name - yet the person was allowed to vote. Another 141 listed addresses outside the city.

The newspaper was denied access to those cards, on the recommendation of the city attorney's office, citing the inquiry.

Felons voted

Reviewing information it had access to, including a computerized list of people recorded as voting, the newspaper identified at least 278 felons who illegally voted statewide, though the vast majority came from within the city.

The real number is likely far higher because the newspaper was able to review only about 38% of the 2.98 million people who voted in the state because of the law that bars access to birth dates. The newspaper was able to link various databases and compare them to a state list of felons on probation or parole at the time of the election.

In response to the newspaper's reports, Doyle and many Republican lawmakers said that rule should be rescinded.

In Wisconsin, only felons who have completed probation or parole are allowed to vote.

Biskupic and McCann said these cases can be hard to prosecute, since it must be established that the felon knew he or she was not allowed to vote and voted anyway.

Thus it is unclear how many of the 200 felons investigators had identified will ultimately be charged.

The newspaper also identified numerous cases in Milwaukee where the same person appears to have voted twice, though that analysis was hampered by major computer problems at the city.

Those problems, which city officials labeled a "glitch," meant hundreds upon hundreds of cases where people are incorrectly listed as voting twice. These are in addition to cases of double voting identified by investigators.

The investigators have been focusing on 100-plus cases in this area. The cases take on many forms.

For instance, non-residents used non-existent city addresses to vote in Milwaukee. Officials are checking to see if they also voted elsewhere, such as from their actual address.

Officials indicated some of the fraud cases could be handled at the federal level because the election involved federal candidates, while other cases could involve state charges.

McCann and Biskupic asked anyone with information on possible fraud call the election task force at (414) 935-7802.

In March, Lisa Artison, a Barrett appointee, resigned as executive director of the Election Commission. She had been under fire for her handling of the election.

Sharon Robinson, head of the Department of Administration, has been overseeing the office and is chairing a city task force reviewing the election. Its report could be issued this month.

Patrick Marley of the Journal Sentinel staff contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2006; 2006elections; aliens; biskupic; cheatingrats; cleanthisup; deadvote; dirtyrats; doyle; driverlicense; felonvote; fraud; howtostealanelection; illegals; illegalvote; mccann; milwaukee; nosameday; photoid; rats; votefraud; voterfraud; voterregistration; voting; wisconsin; wistolenelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2005 6:52:07 AM PDT by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ninenot

Time for the feds to step in and make good on the guarantee of a republican form of government in every state.


2 posted on 05/11/2005 6:55:23 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("One cannot say that a law is right simply because it is a law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; afraidfortherepublic; A. Pole; hedgetrimmer; XBob; Elliott Jackalope; VOA; ...

Did you vote?

With Wisconsin's Most High Protector of Fraud, (Jim Doyle, D, Governor) your vote in the last Presidential election was almost annulled.

This story covers only Milwaukee. Kenosha, Racine, and Madison are also hot-spots for fraud.

GWB lost Wisconsin by about 14,000 votes, and the US Senate seat stayed Democrat by only about 25,000.

In all likelihood, BOTH were a result of massive fraud.


3 posted on 05/11/2005 6:55:41 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
Blue state Red state.
4 posted on 05/11/2005 6:56:20 AM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninenot

It's funny, always Democrats are opposed to some sort of ID used for voting. If this were to happen, what little votes they may get in the future would definetly dwindle. Whenever I hear that it always makes me go hmmm...


5 posted on 05/11/2005 6:56:24 AM PDT by Ragtop (We are the people our parents warned us about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

What? A National Voter ID card?


6 posted on 05/11/2005 6:56:34 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

We can't even get the FedGov to enforce our borders, follow the Constitution, or make sense. How the heck are we gonna get them to enforce a States election laws?


7 posted on 05/11/2005 6:59:52 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ninenot

I don't see how that would stop any of what is going on. I'd say the feds have to actually run the election, including verifying the integrity of voter rolls, the eligibility of those who vote, and the number of votes cast in each precinct... all the things that must be done to insure that an election is a real expression of the will of the people.


8 posted on 05/11/2005 6:59:55 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("One cannot say that a law is right simply because it is a law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ragtop

Do the Iraq thing. Dip a finger. If a felon/illegal alien is found with a purple finger, shoot them on the spot.


9 posted on 05/11/2005 7:00:39 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ninenot

Wait till the illegals show up in 2006. There WILL be a massive effort to overwhelm the polling places.. you can bet on it. The citizen voice will be essentially, eliminated. If successful, the political landscape will have shifted enough by 2008, that everyone in America will play the game of felons, illegals, and the dead... and converge upon multiple polling places, claim illegal status as prestige, apply for absentee voter status in other states, etc... If this is not fixed now, there may be no turning back.


10 posted on 05/11/2005 7:01:13 AM PDT by JesseJane (Close the Borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ragtop

..always Democrats are opposed to some sort of ID used for voting...
----
Well, of course, that might cause them to lose!!! All those dead folks, all those illegals, all the felons, all the fine folks that vote **DEMOCRAT**


11 posted on 05/11/2005 7:02:52 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
GWB lost Wisconsin by about 14,000 votes, and the US Senate seat stayed Democrat by only about 25,000.

Any chance of a new vote? < /rhetorical question>

12 posted on 05/11/2005 7:02:55 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
The fraud investigation has focused on the more than 70,000 people who registered to vote on election day, not the other 200,000-plus voters. That is because registration cards provide a paper trail, which officials said would be stronger in court than computerized records.

It is unclear what identification these 100-plus people provided at the polls to register. State law allows utility bills and leases to be used or for one voter to vouch for another.

What poor writing. Who are these 100-plus people mentioned? Is this part of the 200,000-plus, or the 70,000 mentioned in the previous paragraph? After reviewing, and reviewing, I think they may be referencing the 100 people mentioned some 13 paragraphs earlier.

13 posted on 05/11/2005 7:05:40 AM PDT by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
The democrats are masters of the Big Lie Voter Fraud. They scream and hissy-fit hystrionicallly carry on (Barbara Boxer style), but are in fact the only real perpetrators of fraud in this Nation.

Ask Governor Rossi of Washington State, ousted in a sucessful coup by completely fraudulent votes for a crooked shyster.

14 posted on 05/11/2005 7:09:05 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Yeah, I figure I will never vote Democrat until I'm dead.


15 posted on 05/11/2005 7:09:27 AM PDT by Ragtop (We are the people our parents warned us about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ninenot

Hmmm, I wonder who they voted for?.....


16 posted on 05/11/2005 7:10:47 AM PDT by The_Victor (Doh!... stupid tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninenot

It makes no sense to me that people that do not contribute to the general tax fund should have any input into the selection of those that are in charge of it’s distribution.

What I would like to so see is the government use the IRS data base to mail out “voter tickets” to the taxpayers, who then have to provide a photo ID to use their “voter ticket” at election time.


17 posted on 05/11/2005 7:11:09 AM PDT by FMBass (“Now that I’m sober I watch a lot of news” – Garofalo: From “Treason” by Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninenot

I'm finding a margin of only 11,813, from an ABC web page. FWIW.


18 posted on 05/11/2005 7:12:46 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Official Ruling Class Oligarch Oppressor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ragtop

You win the "best line of the day" award.


19 posted on 05/11/2005 7:14:50 AM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FMBass

Not Constitutional, but a good idea.

A few posts up, the "inky finger" was suggested, which is likely a VERY good idea.

Coupled with actual, real, verifiable ID, of course, which our Governor vetoed just last week.


20 posted on 05/11/2005 7:15:09 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson