1 posted on
05/11/2005 6:52:07 AM PDT by
ninenot
To: ninenot
Time for the feds to step in and make good on the guarantee of a republican form of government in every state.
2 posted on
05/11/2005 6:55:23 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
("One cannot say that a law is right simply because it is a law.")
To: Willie Green; afraidfortherepublic; A. Pole; hedgetrimmer; XBob; Elliott Jackalope; VOA; ...
Did you vote?
With Wisconsin's Most High Protector of Fraud, (Jim Doyle, D, Governor) your vote in the last Presidential election was almost annulled.
This story covers only Milwaukee. Kenosha, Racine, and Madison are also hot-spots for fraud.
GWB lost Wisconsin by about 14,000 votes, and the US Senate seat stayed Democrat by only about 25,000.
In all likelihood, BOTH were a result of massive fraud.
3 posted on
05/11/2005 6:55:41 AM PDT by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
To: ninenot
Blue state Red state.
4 posted on
05/11/2005 6:56:20 AM PDT by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: ninenot
It's funny, always Democrats are opposed to some sort of ID used for voting. If this were to happen, what little votes they may get in the future would definetly dwindle. Whenever I hear that it always makes me go hmmm...
5 posted on
05/11/2005 6:56:24 AM PDT by
Ragtop
(We are the people our parents warned us about)
To: ninenot
The fraud investigation has focused on the more than 70,000 people who registered to vote on election day, not the other 200,000-plus voters. That is because registration cards provide a paper trail, which officials said would be stronger in court than computerized records. It is unclear what identification these 100-plus people provided at the polls to register. State law allows utility bills and leases to be used or for one voter to vouch for another.
What poor writing. Who are these 100-plus people mentioned? Is this part of the 200,000-plus, or the 70,000 mentioned in the previous paragraph? After reviewing, and reviewing, I think they may be referencing the 100 people mentioned some 13 paragraphs earlier.
To: ninenot
The democrats are masters of the Big Lie Voter Fraud. They scream and hissy-fit hystrionicallly carry on (Barbara Boxer style), but are in fact the only real perpetrators of fraud in this Nation.
Ask Governor Rossi of Washington State, ousted in a sucessful coup by completely fraudulent votes for a crooked shyster.
14 posted on
05/11/2005 7:09:05 AM PDT by
FormerACLUmember
(Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
To: ninenot
Hmmm, I wonder who they voted for?.....
16 posted on
05/11/2005 7:10:47 AM PDT by
The_Victor
(Doh!... stupid tagline)
To: ninenot
It makes no sense to me that people that do not contribute to the general tax fund should have any input into the selection of those that are in charge of its distribution.
What I would like to so see is the government use the IRS data base to mail out voter tickets to the taxpayers, who then have to provide a photo ID to use their voter ticket at election time.
17 posted on
05/11/2005 7:11:09 AM PDT by
FMBass
(“Now that I’m sober I watch a lot of news” – Garofalo: From “Treason” by Coulter)
To: ninenot
Had a larger state, such as Ohio, gone the other way, it could have led to a Florida-style recount here that would have turned on many of the issues that instead were left for the newspaper to uncover in its extensive investigation.
22 posted on
05/11/2005 7:22:06 AM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
To: ninenot
Nonetheless, it is likely that many - perhaps most - of those who committed fraud won't face prosecution because city records are so sloppy that it will be difficult to establish cases that will stand up in court. Government bureaucrats being sloppy in their record keeping? Voter fraudsters getting away with their crimes?
What a surprise!
To: steveegg
24 posted on
05/11/2005 7:28:50 AM PDT by
ChefKeith
(Apply here to be added to the NASCAR Ping List, Daytona is done but we got 26 more races to go...)
To: ninenot
What I can't understand is that here in Washington state, we have the very same problem in King County (Seattle) and the U.S Attorney refuses to get involved. He says that it is a state matter. Do federal laws apply differently in the several states?
27 posted on
05/11/2005 7:46:16 AM PDT by
Forrestfire
("To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society." Theodore Roosevelt)
To: ninenot
This story is an exact replica of what is happening in Washington State.
Next week there is a trial of the election here in Washington State. It should get national news attention.
29 posted on
05/11/2005 8:18:00 AM PDT by
Hostage
To: ninenot
Interesting that a certain party is very opposed to improving voting procedures. Could it be they are benefitting from fraudelent votes?
To: ninenot
Speaking of IDs, Wendy from
Boots and Sabers has
a piece (on the Badger Blog Alliance) about how Jim (Craps) Doyle wants seasoned citizens to suffer from the common cold by requiring, among other restrictions, a photo ID for the purchase of most cold medications.
According to Charlie Sykes, when questioned by a brave reporter on the difference between that and requiring a photo ID to vote, he said in an annoyed tone, "Patrick, I know this is difficult to understand, but the right to vote is guaranteed in the Constitution,"
39 posted on
05/11/2005 10:23:45 AM PDT by
steveegg
(Bring back Hoosier, Firestone; SOMEBODY to get Badyear off their duffs and make a good tire.)
To: ninenot
Indexed to
WISTOLENELECTION, an ever-growing (yet incomplete) list of posts on how the DemonRATs stole Wisconsin in 2004.
40 posted on
05/11/2005 10:33:12 AM PDT by
steveegg
(Bring back Hoosier, Firestone; SOMEBODY to get Badyear off their duffs and make a good tire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson