Skip to comments.
Clinton Fundraising Probe
Sacunion - AP ^
| May 9, 2005
| Paul Chavez
Posted on 05/09/2005 7:32:30 PM PDT by jwalburg
LOS ANGELESA lavish politics-goes-Hollywood fundraiser that helped propel Hillary Clinton into the U.S. Senate is the main event at the pending federal trial of the New York Democrats former campaign finance director.
...
Its rare for alleged federal campaign finance violations to go to trial. But that is whats scheduled to happen Tuesday in federal court here, with witnesses including Sen. Edward Kennedys brother-in-law, who wore a wire for the government.
Based on that conversation and allegedly false federal filings, prosecutors charged finance director David Rosen with deliberately lowballing the cost of the August 2000 gala. An FBI agent has speculated that Rosen was trying to duck federal financing rules so the campaign would have more money to spend on the race. ... The prosecution by the Justice Departments public integrity section is unusual: most federal election cases are handled administratively with fines, not criminal charges.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacunion.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: attack; campaign; campaigncash; clinton; clintonlegacy; clintonscandals; credibility; david; davidrosen; finance; fundraising; hillary; hillaryscandals; hitlary; hrc; perjury; probe; prosecutors; rosen; tonken; trial; worstlady; x42
Under arcane campaign finance rules of the time, reporting the events actual cost would have forced the Senate campaign to forfeit coveted hard money" Can't have that now, can we?
1
posted on
05/09/2005 7:32:31 PM PDT
by
jwalburg
To: jwalburg
My goodness...AP is reporting this?
What's the temperature in hell?
2
posted on
05/09/2005 7:33:37 PM PDT
by
daler
To: jwalburg
"arcane" = "too hard for you to owrry oyur pretty little head about dear reader. God back to watching American Idol and ignore this complicated story."
3
posted on
05/09/2005 7:37:31 PM PDT
by
HarryCaul
To: daler
It is rather curious. The story is slanted, of course, kind of a mountain-over-a-molehill attitude, but still, interesting for the details, like $25,000 a couple dinners attended by 350 couples.
4
posted on
05/09/2005 7:37:49 PM PDT
by
jwalburg
(If I have not seen as far as others, it is because of the giants standing on my shoulders.)
To: jwalburg
"Clinton Fundraising Probe"Anything to do with a "tongue"? ;-)
To: jwalburg
It is not the first time a Clintons campaign has been under scrutiny for alleged fundraising violations _ President Clintons 1996 campaign was dogged by allegations of illegal fundraising from overseas donors. Holy crap. Let's call a spade a spade. It was the freakin' Chinese and everyone knows it. The media is still trying to protect this guy and AP is up to it's usual tricks.
6
posted on
05/09/2005 7:43:24 PM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(This tagline will be destoyed to make way for a new Hyperspace bypass.)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Yeah. And it was only allegations, of course. Keep moving. Move on.
7
posted on
05/09/2005 7:46:25 PM PDT
by
jwalburg
(If I have not seen as far as others, it is because of the giants standing on my shoulders.)
To: jwalburg

could this whole Tom DeLay thing have been a just a big Preemptive Strike because she/the DNC et.al. knew this was coming and wanted to muddy the waters with a Prevent Defense move???
8
posted on
05/09/2005 8:40:51 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: jwalburg
"An FBI agent has speculated that Rosen was trying to duck federal financing rules so the campaign would have more money to spend on the race."
Anyone noticed that a number of news reports have used the word "duck" to describe what he did?
I mean, "duck" wouldn't be anything like, say, "evade" or "willingly break the law," now would it?
To: Reactionary
I think we need a picture of a duck. Liberals have found their meme and they're sticking to it.
To: Chode
Now there's an interesting theory. It seems like they've done just this before, though I'm not coming up with examples.
11
posted on
05/09/2005 9:06:29 PM PDT
by
jwalburg
(If I have not seen as far as others, it is because of the giants standing on my shoulders.)
To: Reactionary


The real DU
12
posted on
05/09/2005 9:09:05 PM PDT
by
jwalburg
(If I have not seen as far as others, it is because of the giants standing on my shoulders.)
To: Chode
I have no doubt Delay was a smokescreen. After all of the hot air from the stupid liberals and the media, I didn't once hear anyone say what laws Delay had broken.
But, of course, now we get to hear about the right wing cabal out to get poor little Hillary. Oh. And we also get to hear how Rosen just wanted to "duck" a few minor things involving millions.
The usual..
To: Chode
ould this whole Tom DeLay thing have been a just a big Preemptive Strike because she/the DNC et.al. knew this was coming and wanted to muddy the waters with a Prevent Defense move???
I thought this exactly when the Delay fake scandal first came up knowing that this case was about to come up. Hillary might as well hang it up, she has the Kennedy clan working against her. The VRWC is the least of her problems.
14
posted on
05/09/2005 9:10:25 PM PDT
by
John Lenin
(The truth is the opposite of whatever Dan Rather says it is)
To: jwalburg
I'm still looking for the word "felony" in this wonderful piece.
To: Reactionary
| I'm still looking for the word "felony" in this wonderful piece. Didn't you read it? It walks like a felony, and it quacks like a felony, but according to the AP, it's a duck.
|
16
posted on
05/09/2005 10:16:35 PM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(Honey, Intel wants to go outside)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson