Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 8 May 2005
Various big media television networks ^ | 8 May 2005 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 05/08/2005 5:34:14 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, May 8th, 2005

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, R-Calif.; Sens. George Allen, R-Va., and Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Gary Schroen, former CIA agent; Democratic strategist James Carville; Republican strategist Mary Matalin.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Joe Biden, D-Del.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Jack Welch, former General Electric CEO; Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and Chuck Hagel, R-Neb.; comedian Jerry Lewis.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Sens. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Mohamed ElBaradei, director general, International Atomic Energy Agency; former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright; former CIA Deputy Director John McLaughlin; retired Army Gen. George Joulwan, former NATO supreme commander; retired Army Maj. Gen. James A. Marks.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: facethenation; foxnewssunday; georgeallen; guests; lateedition; lineup; meetthepress; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-198 next last
To: rodguy911
I don't know what it is but whenever I see Carville I just start looking for a que-stick.

And a cube of chalk.
141 posted on 05/08/2005 7:39:53 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
George Allen is the next President of the United States.

I could live with that. As long as it's NOT the Hildebeast, McCaniac, or "kinda dumb" Hagel.

142 posted on 05/08/2005 7:39:56 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver; All
Yeah really.
Mary doing a pretty good job of pointing out how the rats constantly try and subvert democracy by taking their issues to the judiciary.

Gotta go. Taking the wife to Little Palm Island for brunch. Gotta catch the boat. This was fun.
143 posted on 05/08/2005 7:42:29 AM PDT by rodguy911 (rodguy911:First Let's get rid of the UN and the ACLU,..toss in CAIR as well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Rack em' I got the solids you take the stripes.
144 posted on 05/08/2005 7:44:11 AM PDT by rodguy911 (rodguy911:First Let's get rid of the UN and the ACLU,..toss in CAIR as well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Crawdad
Then one Republican on the committee should do a "Jeffords" for about 15 minutes and then jump back.

Interesting idea!!!!!

145 posted on 05/08/2005 7:44:30 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Is that really true? Is there any source for that claim? I would think that parlimentary procedures would allow a vote once a quorum was reached.

If there is, it's in Senate Rules. I'm making a cursory review of them now.

http://rules.senate.gov/senaterules/menu.htm <- See XXIV and later

http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Committees.htm

146 posted on 05/08/2005 7:45:10 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanks. Jackbill's post at #133 provides some good info as well.


147 posted on 05/08/2005 7:46:38 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
I found this to be interesting.

"4. Whenever upon such roll call it shall be ascertained that a quorum is not present, a majority of the Senators present may direct the Sergeant at Arms to request, and, when necessary, to compel the attendance of the absent Senators, which order shall be determined without debate; and pending its execution, and until a quorum shall be present, no debate nor motion, except to adjourn, or to recess pursuant to a previous order entered by unanimous consent, shall be in order."

148 posted on 05/08/2005 7:49:22 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

I hereby withdraw my suggestion. They would kick his a$$.
How about a garbage collector? Nah, he would dent everyones cans. Maybe he IS useless??


149 posted on 05/08/2005 7:50:02 AM PDT by international american (Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: All
And now a word from our Sponsors of Free Speech
Click on a service emblem to send an online
Thank You to a service man or woman in any branch.
U.S. Arny U.S. Navy U.S. Marines U.S. Air Force U.S. Coast Guard
Army
Navy
Marines
Air Force
Coast
Guard

150 posted on 05/08/2005 7:50:43 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Have you said Thank You to a service man or woman today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
All I can think of is 1) he gets paid to get beat up, and 2) he gets to show his ability of parroting Democrat talking points from memory.

Only one minor point, and that is, Juan never is able to memorize anything. He always reads from stacks and stacks of printouts.

151 posted on 05/08/2005 7:52:04 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (If this isn't the End Times it certainly is a reasonable facsimile...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: kabar
a majority of the Senators present may direct the Sergeant at Arms to request, and, when necessary, to compel the attendance of the absent Senators

Now that would be worth seeing. I hope they are really "gentle" with Joe Biden.
152 posted on 05/08/2005 7:52:40 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

LOL Yeah, gag him and Frog march him in.


153 posted on 05/08/2005 7:53:54 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Unbelieveably, I don't think Juan said anything stupid.


154 posted on 05/08/2005 7:56:14 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

I thought Juan kept the paperwork close as a proof source for his obscure positions. At least, I've seen him wave some of it when responding to being corrected in the past. And, since I've seen him often losing his cool in responses, when he repeated his lines without paperwork props, my assumption was he could actually repeat his lines properly. If I'm wrong, I'll gladly return the ribbon. Oops.... FOX is coming on here, finally. It's time to see the things I've been reading here.


155 posted on 05/08/2005 7:57:18 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: kabar

That rule is for the full Senate. The relevant rules are those that I posted in #133, i.e. for the Foreign Relations committee.

This morning, when Lugar was asked if there would be a vote on Thursday, said that there were any number of parliamentarian gimmicks that could keep it from happening. He didn't mention what they were.

The rule that you mentioned is the one that would surely be exercised if there was a true filibuster of judicial nominees on the floor of the Senate.


156 posted on 05/08/2005 7:58:35 AM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Or John Kerry, he's probably pretty good at "frog" marching.


157 posted on 05/08/2005 7:59:00 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

and Juan still thinks that he is right!


158 posted on 05/08/2005 8:00:03 AM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
"...Little Palm Island for brunch."

Envy attack. This is a much better thing to do on Sunday than watch the Sunday talk shows or TCM as a refuge.

159 posted on 05/08/2005 8:05:13 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Well so far today I have not heard any comments or questions about Dingy Harry's comment about Bush being a loser. You'd think they'd mention it, huh?


160 posted on 05/08/2005 8:08:44 AM PDT by Fishtalk (Pop Culture and Political Pundit-http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson