Posted on 05/03/2005 3:31:13 PM PDT by Paul_Denton
In the never-ending battle to destroy our constitution, more big lie propaganda is being dumped on our elected officials. The rhetoric given forth by the Violence Policy Center (VPC) so easily deceived the legislators of California resulting in the banning of fifty caliber rifles because they are powerful and their bullets punch holes when they strike. Even single shot .50 cal rifles were banned. Its hard to believe we live in such a dark time that someone has actually banned a single shot rifle. But as you will see, this is the cleverest of all gun bans, and the end goal is civilian disarmament, the confiscation of your tools of liberty, your rifles.
What lies before us is the continuation of the misinformation campaign, trying to coax yet another state to infringe upon the U.S. Constitution as California did. The anti- freedom/anti-gun movement has discovered how transparent they appear when they propose sweeping gun bans and now are successful by biting off a little at a time. Ever so small, many politicians are trading off your rights without you recognizing their violations.
First we had the Saturday Night Specials which was all affordable handguns, then sniper rifles which were any scoped deer rifle. Those were obvious, too big a scam to go unnoticed, but with the creation and demonization of the term assault weapon, the Clintons Crime bill produced a 10-year setback on your freedoms and safe gun design. Now comes another scam. This time they are shocked to discover that rifles are accurate and powerful.
This is the same bull the officials in the 1950s fell for when they banned the self-unfolding knife. First the knife was demonized by giving it an evil name, switchblade, then we (the trusting public) were told that the problem of gang violence was solved with its banning. How ridiculous. Its surprising they didnt ban the leather jacket. In reality, gang violence was and is a serious social problem, but it was not related to manually unfolding versus self-unfolding knives. The elected officials voting to ban an object like a knife proved themselves unwilling or uncaring to understand the problem, and thus, incapable of any real solutions.
A handful of people that makes up the VPC are solely responsible for the big lie on .50s, claiming fantastic destruction capabilities. They manipulate fear by claiming terrorists will use these rifles on targets of our infrastructure. They will shut down our airports in flames they claim. VPCs Tom Diaz refers to them as super guns lying to his dupable group of politicians, concealing the facts that there are many rifle cartridges that are comparable in performance (those will be added to the list in phase two). He is boldly telling these officials and all who will listen that the risk of terrorist attacks on these targets will be solved with the banning of powerful rifles, in this case, the .50 caliber rifle. In reality, terrorism is complex and will be defeated with improved intelligence. In this instance, the officials voting to ban an inanimate object like a rifle proves them ignorant of the problem of terrorism and is wasting time and resources.
You must understand the brilliance of this dangerous back door deception. Your politicians are being told that the fifty is a highly destructive cartridge that can destroy airplanes, fuel transport trucks and depot storages of fuel. They show videos like the one on 60 Minutes showing a ½ inch plate of steel being pierced by a .50 cal round while stopping a .308 caliber. This is all to confuse the people, those with little exposure to firearms; their impression concludes that the .50 punches holes in sensitive targets where other rifles cannot. Had they shot actual aluminum that is used on airplane construction, or aluminum or steel used in actual transport or tank construction, both the .50 and the .308 would pierce along with most all centerfire cartridges, but this, they must keep secret.
First, with the confusion of massive, (although incorrect) technical data and the hammering of urgency, the VPC demands a ban or strict regulations on rifles that chamber a cartridge that has the ability to penetrate targets. Sound ridiculous? It is.
VPCs Tom Diaz appears often on TV with maps of Washington, DC, irresponsibly instructing where to position one's self to illegally fire on vulnerable important targets of our government, promising these specific targets will be safe when .50s are banned. He pressures politicians to act quickly on this URGENT legislation needed to make these terrorist targets safe, hoping they will act before the VPC lies are discovered.
Now slow down, a ban on a rifle because it chambers a cartridge that has the ability to penetrate targets? By the legislation naming and defining the targets that are damageable by rifle fire, and in this case, .50 cal. rifle fire, they create a new class of rifles, not defined by such foolishness as detachable magazines, flash hiders or pistol grips, but defined by the harm it could do when criminally misused! This is what California has just done! The ultimate gun ban trick has just been created, the banning of rifles before they can be misused!
Now, we are only talking about those powerful .50 calibers, right? Thats what is in the VPCs direct orders. No, remember they are banning rifles because specific targets named in our infrastructure are susceptible to damage. Now tell me, what centerfire rifle cartridge wont penetrate those targets? What centerfire rifle cartridge is not powerful? Not many or not any? So in order to comply with the spirit and intent of the law the Attorney General or State Secretary must add those cartridges to the banned list. The big lie is exposed. They arent just talking about .50s. Theyre after your hunting rifles, centerfire target rifles - just about any rifle you own.
Unlike California, we cannot allow any of our local, state or federal officials to be deceived with any of this big lie gun control propaganda. The U.S. has every gun law that could possibly be needed. Virtually every real world scenario of firearm abuse is already covered in some law that is currently on the books.
Many of you have inquired as to the outcome of the letter I wrote to Police Chief Bratten of the LAPD. Unfortunately, the chiefs position did not change. He continued to use his officers in the same deceptive practices formerly utilized with the city council. These few officers testifying in Sacramento ultimately contributed to the unconstitutional AB50 law being passed. It saddened me to have to tell members of the LAPD SWAT team they would have to send someone for their rifle, because I refused to assist anyone or any organization that is in violation of the United States Constitution. In turn, the department arranged to pick up their un-serviced rifle.
Barrett cannot legally sell any of its products to lawbreakers. Therefore, since Californias passing of AB 50, the state is not in compliance with the US Constitutions 2nd and 14th Amendments, and we will not sell nor service any of our products to any Government agency of the State of California.
I appreciate all the phone calls and emails from LAPD officers and civilians during that time encouraging and supporting our actions. We shall see if other firearms companies will follow this path. I know many are corporately owned and feel like they are unable to risk the life of their company for the liberties of our nation, but if we lose our Republic, our freedom, what good is any of it? I am in the proud and fortunate position that many of our forefathers were in when they risked all for our liberties.
Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death! Patrick Henry
This ban large bore insanity failed in Washington years ago, but that didnt discourage the VPC. Now its resurfacing in city council meetings in individual states, and its being reintroduced in Washington. NRA-ILA Executive Director, Chris Cox, once told me These (anti-freedom, anti-gun) guys never go away, and they never quit.
Ive received thousands of emails and letters from you offering encouragement and support. Our Republic, our liberty needs and demands your support. You must take action to guard your rights. First, find your State Senator and State Representative. Tell them not to fall for this scam. This lie depends on the elected official being naive about firearms and their capabilities. Stand ready to carry this same message to your U.S. Senator and Representatives. Know all of your elected officials position on gun issues. DO NOT ELECT ANY ANTI-GUN PERSON TO ANY POSITION!
Position yourself with me in the battles we must fight. You need to join the NRA, the .50 Caliber Shooters Association, and the NSSF in order to stay informed. These people have been with me in the trenches fighting for every inch of the liberty you enjoy.
Today we draw a line; there will be no more nibbling at our freedom. Today you stand idle no longer. Today you do something to save our country!
Ronnie Barrett
Owner and CEO
Barrett Firearms Manufacturing Inc.
BTTT
What's wrong Ronnie?
Is a bit of inconvenience too much for your convictions?
So9
I don't think it works that way. If all the pro-gun people move out of California, how does that help the cause? Why set an example of retreat by moving a company that makes quality firearms?
Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc.
P.O. Box 1077
Murfreesboro, TN USA 37133
How do you like your crow served, sir?
Conversely, if you want off my ping-list, let me know.
And my apologies for any redundant pings.
Conversely, if you want off my ping-list, let me know.
And my apologies for any redundant pings.
I like it just fine this way.
I just hate to see a gun manufacturer keeping jobs in CA when job loss is the legislatures biggest fear.
So9
BTTT...
Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
trust you to do what? Post inaccuracies about Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc. and where they manufacture the .50's?
Servant of the 9
Since Sep 17, 2003
Why not post your State flag or perhaps what country you are in?
Rona Barrett's STILL around???
Good job, sir. I, for one wondered what Mr. Barrett's response to the Kalifornia ban would be. I think he should refuse to sell to any and ALL LEOs within this socialist state.
LOL! I could have told Mr. Barrett that he's spinning his wheels trying to reason with Bratton. He's been a gun grabber going back to Boston.
BTTT
I think based on Mr Barretts stand I will not purchase one more glockrugerwinchesterremingtonsigsmithandwessonkharberettabrowningcoltspringfieldHKfn until they too take such a stand. It's time. This man is gonna be hard pressed to stop a jobber or distributor from selling to Kali IMHO but if he's good to his word he'll mandate such before the firearms leaves his factory in TN.
I think I'll go buy one more of his 82A1's that I don't need nor can I really afford but it's my way of showing him support and I'll tell him so. Aside all the money I save on the glockrugerwinchesterremingtonsigsmithandwessonkharberettabrowningcoltspringfieldHKfn I was gonna buy this year will be easy to recover..........:o)
Stay safe and yes on the meet in the panhandle when the Kali Patriot Cartel moves west ! You in Venice ? My little bro is in Melborne.
If you get really pissed and decide to throw out your glockrugerwinchesterremingtonsigsmithandwessonkharberettabrowningcoltspringfieldHKfns, please let me know.
No noooooo I just won't "buy" a new glockrugerwinchesterremingtonsigsmithandwessonkharberettabrowningcoltspringfieldHKfn if the companies that sell glockrugerwinchesterremingtonsigsmithandwessonkharberettabrowningcoltspringfieldHKfn's don't stop selling their glockrugerwinchesterremingtonsigsmithandwessonkharberettabrowningcoltspringfieldHKfn's to goobermint socialist organizations........:o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.