Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moral Absolutes: The Case For Judeo-Christian Values, Part XI (Dennis Prager Alert)
Townhall.com ^ | 05/03/05 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 05/02/2005 10:41:32 PM PDT by goldstategop

Nothing more separates Judeo-Christian values from secular values than the question of whether morality -- what is good or evil -- is absolute or relative. In other words, is there an objective right or wrong, or is right or wrong a matter of personal opinion?

In the Judeo-Christian value system, God is the source of moral values and therefore what is moral and immoral transcends personal or societal opinion. Without God, each society or individual makes up its or his/her moral standards. But once individuals or societies become the source of right and wrong, right and wrong, good and evil, are merely adjectives describing one's preferences. This is known as moral relativism, and it is the dominant attitude toward morality in modern secular society.

Moral relativism means that murder, for example, is not objectively wrong; you may feel it's wrong, but it is no more objectively wrong than your feeling that some music is awful renders that music objectively awful. It's all a matter of personal feeling. That is why in secular society people are far more prone to regard moral judgments as merely feelings. Children are increasingly raised to ask the question, "How do you feel about it?" rather than, "Is it right or wrong?"

Only if God, the transcendent source of morality, says murder is wrong, is it wrong, and not merely one man's or one society's opinion.

Most secular individuals do not confront these consequences of moral relativism. It is too painful for most decent secular people to realize that their moral relativism, their godless morality, means that murder is not really wrong, that "I think murder is wrong," is as meaningless as "I think purple is ugly."

That is why our culture has so venerated the Ten Commandments -- it is a fixed set of God-given moral laws and principles. But that is also why opponents of America remaining a Judeo-Christian country, people who advocate moral relativism, want the Ten Commandments removed from all public buildings. The Ten Commandments represents objective, i.e., God-based morality.

All this should be quite clear, but there is one aspect of moral relativism that confuses many believers in Judeo-Christian moral absolutes. They assume that situational ethics is the same thing as moral relativism and therefore regard situational ethics as incompatible with Judeo-Christian morality. They mistakenly argue that just as allowing individuals to determine what is right and wrong negates moral absolutes, allowing situations to determine what is right and wrong also negates moral absolutes.

This is a misunderstanding of the meaning of moral absolutes. It means that if an act is good or bad, it is good or bad for everyone in the identical situation ("universal morality").

But "everyone" is hardly the same as "every situation." An act that is wrong is wrong for everyone in the same situation, but almost no act is wrong in every situation. Sexual intercourse in marriage is sacred; when violently coerced, it is rape. Truth telling is usually right, but if, during World War II, Nazis asked you where a Jewish family was hiding, telling them the truth would have been evil.

So, too, it is the situation that determines when killing is wrong. That is why the Ten Commandments says "Do not murder," not "Do not kill." Murder is immoral killing, and it is the situation that determines when killing is immoral and therefore murder. Pacifism, the belief that it is wrong to take a life in every situation, is based on the mistaken belief that absolute morality means "in every situation" rather than "for everyone in the same situation." For this reason, it has no basis in Judeo-Christian values, which holds that there is moral killing (self-defense, defending other innocents, taking the life of a murderer) and immoral killing (intentional murder of an innocent individual, wars of aggression, terrorism, etc.).

But situational ethics aside, the key element to Judeo-Christian morality remains simply this: There is good and there is evil independent of personal or societal opinion; and in order to determine what it is, one must ask, "How would God and my God-based text judge this action?" rather than, "How do I -- or my society -- feel about it?"

That different religious people will at times come up with different responses in no way negates the fact that at least they may be pursuing moral truth. In secular society, where there is no God-based morality, there is no moral truth to pursue. The consequences may be easily seen by observing that the most morally confused institution in America, the university -- where good and evil are often either denied or inverted -- is also its most secular.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: absolutes; dennisprager; faith; feelings; judeochristian; moralabsolutes; moralrelativism; morals; prager; relativism; rightandwrong; secularism; situationalethics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
There are universal norms of right and wrong Dennis Prager calls "moral absolutes." We don't apply these norms rigidly, without regard to the context of the situation. The aim is always to do the right thing, so saving an innocent life during World War II transcend an obligation to to tell the truth. Secular people are confused since they are guided not by any objective sense of what's right and wrong - but by their feelings. When you have values to guide you, you have clarity and faith in the future. A spiritually alienated civilization that doesn't have them has neither reassurance nor the hope things will get better. Nowhere is the case for Judeo-Christian values better stressed than in Prager's emphasis on the importance of moral absolutes. They are the key to the spiritual health of both individuals and society.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
1 posted on 05/02/2005 10:41:33 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Prager Bump


2 posted on 05/02/2005 10:43:51 PM PDT by Slicksadick (Go out on a limb........Its where the fruit is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; St. Johann Tetzel; DaveTesla; mercygrace; ...

Moral Absolutes Ping.

Oh good, more Dennis Prager. I am crosseyed with tiredness and can't read this article but I know YOU all want to read it, so here it is.

I will read it tomorrow and add my incisive and illuminating comments /end sarc.

Living one's life according to "feelings" and especially bringing children up that way creates a veritable hell on earth. Why, one may ask? Because only the big dog's feelings are the ones that count.

Let me know if you want on/off this pinglist.


3 posted on 05/02/2005 10:47:29 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

And suppose it makes the big dog feel good to bite your head off.


4 posted on 05/02/2005 10:48:00 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: bahblahbah

6 posted on 05/02/2005 11:20:48 PM PDT by Alouette (Proudly overpopulating the planet since 1972.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: RepublicanEagle
Jeez, get over yourself. It was a WWII US propaganda photo. Here want another one that might make you feel better.


8 posted on 05/02/2005 11:28:45 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RepublicanEagle

Oh, and that is a pretty dumb interpretation. That was US propaganda, not Nazi.


9 posted on 05/02/2005 11:29:36 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: RepublicanEagle
Negative, you just can't interpret the emotion a propaganda poster was trying to instill.
11 posted on 05/02/2005 11:30:59 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: goldstategop
"Moral relativism means that murder, for example, is not objectively wrong; you may feel it's wrong, but it is no more objectively wrong than your feeling that some music is awful renders that music objectively awful."

The above brings the Terri Schiavo case immediately to mind.

13 posted on 05/02/2005 11:40:15 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (Terri Schiavo was NOT in coma, JUSTICE was.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RepublicanEagle

That's not the implication at all.


14 posted on 05/02/2005 11:44:37 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

BUMP!


15 posted on 05/02/2005 11:45:24 PM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical! †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: RepublicanEagle
You found it so offensive that you could almost curse. Oh wait... If you found that offensive I would think you would feel the same for the Passion of the Christ.

Anyway, I forgot to say in my first post that the reason I posted it was to show that back in WWII that we were so defined by our Christian heritage that we used it in propaganda posters.

Here's a good one to use against gay marriage.


18 posted on 05/02/2005 11:51:33 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Why did you ban that guy? He just cussed once yet seemed pretty nice.


19 posted on 05/02/2005 11:57:27 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Well, as far as taking of life is concerned, it could be felonious, excusable, justifiable or praiseworthy - it all depends.


20 posted on 05/03/2005 12:07:57 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson