Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pontiac GTO again flexes its muscles
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | May 2, 2005 | DAN JEDLICKA AUTO WRITER

Posted on 05/02/2005 4:25:19 AM PDT by Chi-townChief

Critics of last year's reborn Pontiac GTO coupe disliked the car because it didn't look rakish, as did most versions of the iconic 1960s GTO muscle car. But the 2005 GTO looks sportier, with such things as new hood scoops, and its more potent 400-horsepower V-8 makes it the fastest GTO ever.

No wonder GTO sales in the first quarter of this year were up 81 percent over the same year-ago period, with 3,261 units sold. Pontiac spokesman Jim Hopson said the GTO is "red hot in Southern California, which isn't exactly one of our biggest markets. Los Angeles is our No. 2 market for the GTO, and it's been a long time since we've been able to say that about any Pontiac.''

The rear-wheel-drive GTO is true to the original 1960s muscle car formula of putting a big engine in a brawny mid-size rear-drive coupe. However, the new GTO is put together in Australia and has a definite foreign-car feel.

My red test GTO looked slick and fast. Giving it a handsome retro-style 1960s GTO body would have caused excessive wind noise and fuel-robbing aerodynamic drag. Many have forgotten that the first GTO was a boxy 1964 Tempest coupe with a GTO option package containing a muscular V-8, sport suspension and special tires and trim. A distinct GTO model didn't arrived until 1965.

Sleeker, more powerful GTOs were sold between the 1964 and 1971 models. Stiff insurance premiums and safety and emissions laws led the last GTO to be a boxy, low-powered 1974 Pontiac Ventura.

Last year's GTO had a modified Chevrolet Corvette 350-horsepower V-8 and blended speed with exceptional handling. Classic GTOs mainly were known for straight-line acceleration; they didn't handle or brake well by today's higher standards. Features such as the 2005 GTO's traction control system and anti-lock brakes simply didn't exist. Even race cars lacked tires comparable to the superwide 45-series tires on the current GTO.

The GTO had lukewarm 2004 sales of 13,569 units -- about 5,000 short of projected sales. Many of the growing number of fast-car buyers were waiting for the $24,600 300-horsepower 2005 Ford Mustang GT V-8 coupe or got the rakish Chrysler 300C sedan with a 325-horsepower Hemi V-8. The 300C costs $800 more than the $32,295 GTO.

Things are picking up for the 2005 GTO. Sales through March this year aren't close to those of the GT or 300C, but totaled 3,261 cars -- up from 1,801 in the same 2004 period. The GTO is a bargain if only because it has a 400-horsepower modified V-8 from the new Corvette, which starts at $43,710.

The neck-snapping GTO hits 60 mph in 4.7 seconds with the optional $695 six-speed manual gearbox and 4.6 with the standard four-speed automatic transmission. Car and Driver magazine found it does 0-100 mph in 11.7 seconds.

Torque is a massive 400 pound-feet, which means the manual gearbox isn't needed for startling performance. The automatic transmission is expected to be chosen by approximately half of GTO buyers, which was the case with last year's model.

Estimated fuel economy with the manual gearbox is 16 mpg in the city -- but 25 on highways because the V-8 loafs in top overdrive gear. Figures with the automatic are 16 and 21, partly because the automatic isn't a five- or six-speed unit.

The GTO has lots of comfort and convenience equipment, including air conditioning, leather upholstery, power accessories and a 200-watt, 10-speaker sound system. The only option other than the manual transmission is a hood without the scoops, and it's a "no-cost delete option.''

No sunroof, heated seats, navigation system or side airbags are offered. That's partly because the GTO was brought to market quickly and is an Americanized version of the Monaro model from General Motors' Australian Holden branch. Sunroofs and heated seats aren't popular in Australia, and Pontiac thought there would be little demand for the navigation system here.

GM used a Monaro because it had no rear-drive American car it could modify to create a new GTO. Behind the car is GM product czar Bob Lutz, who thought there had been too long a wait for the return of the fabled GTO.

The GTO has no frills, except for a few small "GTO'' fender badges and a discreet "6.0 liter'' badge on the trunk that signifies that it has the new V-8, which has "GTO'' lettering on its valve covers. The revised rear fascia has a bumper that better separates two large exhaust outlets in the new split exhaust system, which has polished exhaust outlet tips. As with exotics such as Ferrari, front brake calipers are painted red (with the GTO logo on them) to make them stand out behind the large 17-inch spoked alloy wheels. A new driver foot rest is a handy item on long trips.

The quiet, refined GTO is comfortable, but a kick to drive. The car stops as well as it goes, with larger new brakes and a linear-action pedal for smooth stops. The variable ratio power steering is quick, although a little heavy. The supple all-independent suspension results in a smooth, nicely controlled ride. Handling is impressive, helped by the traction control and a limited-slip differential.

Long doors are a problem in tight spots, but otherwise make it easy to get in and out of the front. There's good front room in supportive bucket seats, and the seats power forward to allow easier entry to the spacious rear area, which also has twin bucket seats. However, front seats move slowly and rear entry/exit is tight. Fixed back windows don't lower.

The leather-covered tilt-telescopic steering wheel is nicely sized, but gauge numbers are small and it's hard to read the odometer and fuel range numbers in sunlight.

Power-window controls are on the console, instead of being more conveniently placed on the doors, which have pockets that don't hold much. The console also has a small, but deep, covered storage bin and large twin cupholders.

Although nicely shaped, the trunk is small for this fairly large 190-inch-long car because the fuel tank had to be repositioned behind the back-seat bulkhead to meet U.S. crash rules. Rear seatbacks don't fold forward to enlarge the cargo area.

The trunk lid has old-style hinges, but the hood moves up and down smoothly on twin hydraulic struts. The engine compartment has easily reached fluid filler areas, and a thick transverse race-car-style bar at the rear of the compartment helps show why the GTO has solidity that helps provide precise handling.

The GTO is a strong player for the money in the high-performance market because few under-$33,000 cars provide its driving excitement.

PONTIAC GTO PRICE $32,295

LIKES More power. Racier look. Lightning fast. Deft handling. Legendary nameplate.

DISLIKES Small trunk. Long doors awkward in tight spots. Small gauge numbers.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: automakers; boring; gto; hohum; musclecars; weakimitation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: sushiman
I always dug the '68 Camaro 427 SS ...
21 posted on 05/02/2005 4:48:24 AM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

I remember that -- it had to be the run on the way to school in the am!

Ahh back when cars were cars. Put today's junk up against the sight of a 1969 GTO lined up next to a 1969 Charger R/S. Heck, even a Duster (or Demon) up against a Camero (with the small block 8).


22 posted on 05/02/2005 4:49:20 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women (HJ Simpson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris

They don't write 'em like that anymore (maybe they shouldn't.)


23 posted on 05/02/2005 4:49:58 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

24 posted on 05/02/2005 4:49:59 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Up yer alley ping.


25 posted on 05/02/2005 4:50:40 AM PDT by biblewonk (John 2:4 "Woman, what does your concern have to do with Me?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

anyone else Image Google GTO and get interesting Japanese results? ;)


26 posted on 05/02/2005 4:51:57 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women (HJ Simpson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

27 posted on 05/02/2005 4:55:33 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women (HJ Simpson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Khurkris
Pontiac GTO info pages
29 posted on 05/02/2005 4:56:13 AM PDT by Khurkris (This tag-line is available on CD ROM. NRA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Try again !


30 posted on 05/02/2005 4:57:14 AM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
the new GTO is put together in Australia and has a definite foreign-car feel.
Image hosted by TinyPic.com
I wonder if Max will have a new pursuit special?

31 posted on 05/02/2005 4:59:25 AM PDT by Cowman (I wish they all could be double barreled girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
Mitsubishi GTO
32 posted on 05/02/2005 4:59:36 AM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

did the pic not show up?

It is supposed to be a 1969 Charger.


33 posted on 05/02/2005 5:00:36 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women (HJ Simpson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

They should of redesigned the Trans-Am instead of creating a really ugly GTO.


34 posted on 05/02/2005 5:02:04 AM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief


Good Lord. GM is doomed.
35 posted on 05/02/2005 5:14:15 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (It takes all kinds of critters...to make Farmer Vincents fritters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

First time I looked there was just a red X , but now I can see it . Cool ! I was born in ' 52 so these are the vehicles I remember drooling over in high school ! In 1970 I bought a used Camaro SS 350 hardtop - a real girl magnet . Of course , I wasn't bad looking myself ...Still have dreams about getting that car back ...


36 posted on 05/02/2005 5:17:38 AM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
I like the mid-'60s version better, but that's just me. But, my favorite back then was the Olds 442:


37 posted on 05/02/2005 5:21:00 AM PDT by Pharmboy ("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
For over-the-top 1970's insanity, I like the Plymouth Superbird. A cross between a coupe and an F86 sabre jet.

38 posted on 05/02/2005 5:21:56 AM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
I had the exact same car as this .
39 posted on 05/02/2005 5:23:02 AM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Sorry, but that car just looks boring. May be fast, I don't know.. but I don't care how big the engine is.. that's a boring looking car.... let alone one that's supposed to be a sports car... looks like a knock off of the 94 mustang.

Now that new Pontiac Solstice has some potential in the styling department, not perfect, I would have bumped up the wheel wells a bit more... give it more curves, but has potential.... but the GTO... just yawn.


40 posted on 05/02/2005 5:31:44 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson