And this is not........
Progressive Daily would be a great new brand of toilet paper.
Would someone please be a dearand take this tripe and toss it in the nearest landfill...along with the author?
Psychoanalysis is lame. It is doubly ("Dubyaly") so when the "therapist" has never had a private session with the subject, and attempts to diagnose from afar. Devotees of Freud, Jung, and all the rest have infiltrated history, and some otherwise excellent biographies are ruined due to the stain of "what was his motivation"--and it's always bizarre.
More leftist agenda - they should have just published the last paragraph and saved us a lot of reading.
There you go, "we know for certain, he may have done something." Under that logic I suppose all of us could have been involved in lynchings or rapes. We know Clinton most likely raped a woman. We know Clinton most likely was a cocaine addict. We know most likely Clinton sold secrets to the chinese for campaign funding. How come this logic was never used in the 90's?
Some articles say much, much more about the author than the subject of the text. What a great insight into the mind of a true partisan zealot, we have here. This is truly prima facie evidence that liberalism IS a a mental disorder.
$hit. Total and complete $hit.
Red6
Oooooooooo-hoooooo!
Sounds some like shrink is psychologically threatened by how "real men" act....LOL!
Megalomaniac Mander
lol! this "therapist" is a text-book example of narcissm. And an obvious rookie. Who are the mentors of this "psyche" guy? funny question, no?
A couple of months ago my wife and I wandered into a bookstore in Rhinebeck New York , after attending an antiques show a few miles outside of town. I saw a bunch of people on folding chairs listening to this dildo, Justin Frank, expound his penny-ante, pseudo-Freudian analysis of Bush and his character. From the fringes of the crowd I audibly chuckled, drawing stern gazes from some in the audience, and made my way out of the store.
And this is not........
Laura Bush has explicitly denied saying this. She said she merely said W should take it easy.
A "psychiatrist" who believes he can analyze a person because we all supposedly fit these "types" tells you all you need to know about the dangers of psychology entering the courtroom, for example. Even a raging lib like director William Freidkin once said that bringing psychiatry into the courts has ruined our legal system. This is different, but a symptom of the same bizarre trend that's been going on for a century. I am NOT saying psychiatry is complete trash, because it isn't, and it's an essential tool in helping understand the criminal mind, for example. But "causes" aren't supposed to be what justice is about.
I bring this up only to compare how we deify psychotherapists in the courtroom, and look where that's gotten us; I am sure many folks will listen to this fool, nod, and think "Hey, he's a shrink, he KNOWS this stuff." When in fact, we are all individuals and cannot be diagnosed from afar...though the libs would like us to believe otherwise, that we are all just robots waiting for programming.
I'm a recovering addtci/alcoholic. I'm in my 15th year of sobriety. I've worked at three recovery facilities. I've helped hundreds and seen thousands of people in their recovery. The hallmark of a person that is stagnant in their recovery program is when they focus on another persons recovery and critically judge it. This is little different from the morally bankrupt jackass running around yelling at religious people "judge not lest ye be judged......judge not lest ye be judged."
The Left is nothing if not tediously repetitive, and predictable. Much like those small monkeys at the zoo who like to toss their droppings at visitors, hoping some will stick.
The President has an actual record of accomplishments, things he has gotten done. What does this scribbler have? Words. Empty words on a piece of paper.
I wonder what an article about "progressives" on the couch would say?
Amazing that a professional would diagnose (in detail) a person who he has never meaningfully met, interviewed, or treated.
Amazing that a professional would diagnose (in detail) a person who he has never meaningfully met, interviewed, or treated.
The religious right-wingers frighten and terrify me, conjure images of dungeons and inquisitions, or remind me of Iran. But Dubya's half (it's not really half, you know, more like 1%), just flat pisses me off. The way these people wallow in luxury, and in welfare provided by the tax-payer (even Dubya's salary should be considered as welfare), and how arrogant and stuffed full of cupidity they must of course be,is enough to send me into mega-fits of 100 proof apoplexy. Consider for example the following: