Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich For President '08: Is His Baggage Too Heavy?
MND ^ | Friday, April 29, 2005 | Will Malven

Posted on 04/30/2005 5:42:58 AM PDT by Nasty McPhilthy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 04/30/2005 5:42:59 AM PDT by Nasty McPhilthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

Sounds to me like he's perfectly qualified to be Condi's campaign manager.


2 posted on 04/30/2005 5:51:58 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

Baggage? The Democrats are running Hillary. This is basically a done deal. Talk about baggage!


3 posted on 04/30/2005 5:52:35 AM PDT by speed_addiction (I like to watch the children running and squealing. You see, they don't know I am using blanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

I could vote for him no problem. It's been ten years. Nobody remembers. The dim shill media never forgets. But, the Pubby majority in congress are belong to him and no one else. The big problem in '08 is the same as '88 and '92 too many Pubby candidates not obeying the 11th commandment. Ripping each other to shreds splitting the party, while St. Hitlery enjoys coronation. Newt is a brilliant campaign strategist, he maybe able to at least win the nomination. Frankly I can't see anyone who can beat Hill , maybe a dark-horse like Sam Brownback. The man exudes integrity.


4 posted on 04/30/2005 5:57:02 AM PDT by Calusa (it’s a mere fig leaf of fairness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

I've always loved Newt, but, yes, he has too much baggage.


5 posted on 04/30/2005 5:57:34 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speed_addiction

But the MSM has the beast's back and has the long knives out for Newt.


6 posted on 04/30/2005 5:58:36 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

Newt is just as polarizing as Hillary is....

I don't think he could carry a ticket. Maybe as a VP, but we all know he won't go for that...


7 posted on 04/30/2005 5:59:21 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (MikeinIraq in 2020!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
The answer depends entirely upon his ability to bypass the MSM and get his message directly to the voters

Not doable.

8 posted on 04/30/2005 6:01:51 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (I'm pleased that my banishment was reversed on appeal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

Newt was my congressman for all of the years he was in the Congress. Newt was a good and faithful soldier that led his party to many victories as a purist in ideas. I remember when Newt promised that he would hold President Clinton to his words and deeds and that he would speak out every time he could.....'holding Clinton's feet to the fires' so to speak for each time Clinton hit the 'moral' skids.

Well, now, guess what happened then.....Newt did NOTHING because it would be a case of the pot calling the kettle black. It turns out that Newt was just another politician getting something on the side.

He lost ALL credibility and he has lost my trust. I personally wouldn't vote for him to be dog catcher.

Ideas (good ones) mean nothing if you don't back them up with deeds......


9 posted on 04/30/2005 6:02:00 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Nasty McPhilthy

Newt would be an excellent President. He is a class A American whose country and it's citizens come before politics. If he did run you can be sure the dems would use more 'dirty politics and lies' than they have in the pass.


11 posted on 04/30/2005 6:09:42 AM PDT by Dustbunny (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

Gingrich doesn't have possibilities to win.


12 posted on 04/30/2005 6:10:25 AM PDT by Reader of news
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

He'd be a great President. Unfortunately the leftist media will tear him apart.


13 posted on 04/30/2005 6:13:17 AM PDT by KenmcG414
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy
Gingrich For President '08: Is His Baggage Too Heavy?

If he was a Democrat, No. A Republican, Yes

Clinton lowered the bar for baggage pretty low.

I'd vote for the man. Brilliant mind and he has a spine.

About the best you're going to get these days for President

14 posted on 04/30/2005 6:14:05 AM PDT by Popman (The American Left: Goose Stepping into the Future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

If nothing else, Newt will force the others to address his ideas. That will elevate the whole of the Republican primary and also force the Democrats to face the issues.


15 posted on 04/30/2005 6:20:16 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not everything that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya's fan; Admin Moderator

Jennifer Wilbanks could probably get the nomination as popular as she is on FR today. 29 threads about her this morning seems a little excessive to me. I posted a thread that was pulled because there was one duplicate. WHY all the threads about JENNIFER WILBANKS?


16 posted on 04/30/2005 6:20:51 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
... I remember when Newt promised that he would hold President Clinton to his words and deeds and that he would speak out every time he could.....'holding Clinton's feet to the fires' so to speak for each time Clinton hit the 'moral' skids.

Well, now, guess what happened then.....Newt did NOTHING because it would be a case of the pot calling the kettle black....

You sound like a jilted lover. You state his promises and then explain why he couldn't keep them. Yet, you still blast him like a woman seeking alimony.

17 posted on 04/30/2005 6:24:22 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not everything that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Calusa

The problem is, the MSM will never let the American people forget the ethics problems. Newt is a Republican not a Democrap!


18 posted on 04/30/2005 6:26:40 AM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (We will always remember.We will always be proud.We will always be prepared, so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

If Newt ran for president, I'd not only vote for him once, I'd vote for him twice! (I'm an Indian and can do that, you know).


19 posted on 04/30/2005 6:29:43 AM PDT by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
It wasn't about the affair. Can we stop making it out like Clinton was on trial for adultery?!

When Clinton was governor He asked Paula Jones to give him oral sex. She refused. And she was fired.

That's sexual harassment. That's real deal sexual harassment.

She tried getting her case to trial over and over again, but Clinton pulled strings to make it nearly impossible for her.

Newt did not fire anyone for not peforming oral sex. And he was wise to keep his mouth shut because the media was clearly making the trial out to be an adultery trial by focusing on Monica.
Clinton was not on trial for adultery.
Where Monica Lewinsky came in was that to prove a Sexual Harassment case Paula Jones had to prove someone else who did perform sexual favors benefited in their career from doing so.

Newt was never charged with sexual harassment.
20 posted on 04/30/2005 6:29:51 AM PDT by LauraleeBraswell ( We must stand behind TOM DELAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson