Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California protesters win pepper spray lawsuit
Yahoo News/AP ^ | 04/29/05 | Justin M. Noton

Posted on 04/29/2005 1:47:41 PM PDT by Sterm26

SAN FRANCISCO - Law enforcement officers from two northern California counties were found liable Thursday for using excessive force by swabbing pepper spray in the eyes of logging protesters in 1997. A jury awarded eight plaintiffs $1 each.

It was the third trial in the case; the first two ended in deadlocked juries in 1998 and 2004.

The plaintiffs laughed and hugged outside the courtroom — and applauded when jurors left their chambers.

"They did the right thing," said Terri Slanetz, a 42-year-old naturalist from Oakland. "We've been trying all along to get a statement that this was illegal. It's a positive step toward people treating each other decently."

The protesters claim their civil rights were violated when Humboldt County sheriff's deputies and Eureka police officers swabbed pepper spray directly in their eyes during the 1997 protest.

The protesters argued the pepper spray was used to illegally punish and intimidate them for chaining themselves together and making it difficult for authorities to arrest them.

Attorneys said the verdict would prevent the use of pepper spray on nonviolent protesters.

"The plaintiffs were never in it for the money. They were in it for the principle," attorney Tony Serra said.

The defendants in the case were Humboldt County, the city of Eureka, retired county Sheriff Dennis Lewis and current Sheriff Gary Philp, who was chief deputy sheriff at the time of the protest.

"It's nice to have someone come in with some kind of resolution of the case," Philp said. "The nominal damages show that the jury thought no one got hurt."

The protests took place at the Eureka office of then-Rep. Frank Riggs, and at the Scotia headquarters of the Pacific Lumber Co.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lawsuit; pepperspray; protester
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Note the large award. That's not even enough to buy a good stick of deodorant.
1 posted on 04/29/2005 1:47:44 PM PDT by Sterm26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sterm26
A jury awarded eight plaintiffs $1 each.

That's the jury's way of saying that what law enforcement did may have been illegal, but the jury was glad it happened anyway.

2 posted on 04/29/2005 1:51:43 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26

"We've been trying all along to get a statement that this was illegal. It's a positive step toward people treating each other decently."

Does that mean the enviro-whacko's will quit spiking trees and starting fires?


3 posted on 04/29/2005 1:53:01 PM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I'd gladly pay a dollar to spray some of the dirtbag protesters we have around here.....


4 posted on 04/29/2005 1:53:25 PM PDT by Sterm26 (Recount Pennsylvania!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26
I have no idea what the point of walking up to protestors and dabbing their eyes with pepper spray was. Sounds like the cops just had some pepper spray and didn't know what else to do with it.

I think they each deserved a dollar in compensation. In fact, I would have given them five dollars each, so they could each get a sandwich for their troubles.

5 posted on 04/29/2005 1:53:35 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26

You get paid what you're worth...


6 posted on 04/29/2005 1:54:44 PM PDT by lunarville (memo to Dan...don't let the door hit you on the way out....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26

I would have given them more than a dollar each. I would have ordered that the police departments pay for a nice bath and a haircut for each of them.


7 posted on 04/29/2005 1:55:51 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
I think they each deserved a dollar in compensation. In fact, I would have given them five dollars each, so they could each get a sandwich for their troubles.

Hey, I've been around some of these enviro-whackos, and the smell from them made my eyes irritated and red and watery. Maybe I can win a free lunch, too.

8 posted on 04/29/2005 1:55:53 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26

If pepper spray is out, can you still use mace and tear gas?


9 posted on 04/29/2005 1:58:25 PM PDT by lunarville (memo to Dan...don't let the door hit you on the way out....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26
"They did the right thing," said Terri Slanetz, a 42-year-old naturalist from Oakland. "We've been trying all along to get a statement that this was illegal. It's a positive step toward people treating each other decently."

[...]

The protesters argued the pepper spray was used to illegally punish and intimidate them for chaining themselves together and making it difficult for authorities to arrest them.

Too bad they don't try to reconcile those two statements.

10 posted on 04/29/2005 1:58:28 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26

More fair would be to have the cops pay the dollar. And then have the cops eyes daubed with pepper spray. Fair is fair, the cops broke the law too.


11 posted on 04/29/2005 1:58:50 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; dead

I know a bad idea when I see one, and THAT is a bad idea..

*chuckle*

Think we could get sued for pinning them down and spraying them with deodorant?


12 posted on 04/29/2005 1:59:59 PM PDT by Darksheare (You too can own your very own Bad Idea by Darksheare! Inquire within!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26

Put me down for $20.


13 posted on 04/29/2005 2:00:04 PM PDT by TXBSAFH (Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, who's bringing the chips?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26

Put me down for $20.


14 posted on 04/29/2005 2:00:05 PM PDT by TXBSAFH (Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, who's bringing the chips?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

I would have given them enough money for them all to buy one-way plane tickets to Havana.


15 posted on 04/29/2005 2:01:47 PM PDT by dfwgator (Minutemen: Just doing the jobs that American politicians won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26
I don't see how someone would just sit still while pepper spray is daubed in their eyes with a Q-tip? I've seen the pictures of the so-call application. I did appear that the eyes were most likely being daubed with an antidote for the stinging produced by the spray. They were just sitting there with their heads raised as someone wearing surgical gloves (EMT?) was applying something to the eye.
16 posted on 04/29/2005 2:01:58 PM PDT by SkyDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

I'll send them the $8 myself and give them (the cops) a pat on the back for their restraint.


17 posted on 04/29/2005 2:02:17 PM PDT by Sterm26 (Recount Pennsylvania!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26
I may be wrong, but I think that if ANY money is awarded, the plaintiffs can sue for attorney's fees. If that's the case, it will still cost the cops $$.
18 posted on 04/29/2005 2:02:51 PM PDT by jtminton (The E.P.A.: Bringing you higher gas prices since 1970!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26
I despise these eco-trash nuts as much, in fact more than just about anyone, but if they were not fighting or forcefully resisting, then I would have awarded them maybe $100 each for actual damages, and a lot more for punitive.

Police do not have the right to torture non-violent protestors, and never should have that authority.

19 posted on 04/29/2005 2:05:05 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26

Mmmmmmmm, pepper-spray . . . .


20 posted on 04/29/2005 2:07:46 PM PDT by tumblindice (A li'l dab'll do ya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson