Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PM will portray Harper as threat to values (Canada can't let him get away - BARF ALERT!!!)
Toronto Star ^ | 04/28/05 | Susan Delacourt

Posted on 04/28/2005 10:17:15 AM PDT by Heartofsong83

SUSAN DELACOURT OTTAWA BUREAU CHIEF

OTTAWA—Prime Minister Paul Martin says he wouldn't mind fighting the next election campaign as the underdog.

In an interview with the Toronto Star yesterday, Martin says he is telling Liberals not to lose hope in the face of fading poll fortunes — that the party was actually in worse shape in the middle of last year's election campaign.

"This is very much a horse race," Martin said. "I don't mind going into an election, when it comes, as the underdog."

Though he wouldn't reveal what his internal party polling is telling him, Martin declared authoritatively: "We were in tougher shape in the middle of the last election than we are today. ... I can tell you, that's the way the polls worked out. We're in a horse race here."

Speaking at his Langevin Block office across from Parliament Hill, where he conducted a whole range of back-to-back media interviews yesterday, Martin offered sneak peeks into how he plans to fight an election when his government falls.

It's not an academic question: Conservative Leader Stephen Harper said yesterday that he's ready to provoke a collapse of the government. In many ways, Martin appears to be envisioning a replay of last year's campaign — or at least the last two weeks of it, when Liberals rebounded from almost-inevitable defeat to shaky survival, largely by becoming the underdog and portraying a Harper government as a threat to health care and Canadian social values.

The only differences this time, the Prime Minister signalled yesterday, is that education will replace health care as the big-ticket item and that Martin believes the differences between Liberals and Conservatives will be even more sharply defined.

"I can tell you in terms of the next election campaign, we've set out that areas like education are going to be very important to us," Martin said.

"It may well be (a replay), but it's being brought into even sharper focus. If the Conservatives vote against child care, that's an indication of their values. If the Conservatives vote against climate change, that's an indication of their values. If the Conservatives vote against a budget which is fiscally responsible and which essentially fulfills the government's objectives because in fact what the Conservatives want to do is to play partisan politics with the Bloc Québécois, that is the perspective of their objectives," he said.

Canadians know what they're getting with the Liberals, Martin said, because this year's budget laid it out in some detail. That budget, though, is in the midst of being adjusted as part of a new deal with the NDP.

"I mean our agenda is pretty clear. Canadians know exactly where we want to take the country and they know the fundamental differences between ourselves and Stephen Harper," Martin said.

Clearly buoyed by the NDP support, which came at the price of delaying some corporate tax cuts and investing more money in cities, education and the environment, Martin says he believes the Liberal-NDP pact helps focus the differences with the Tories even more.

"We said from the very beginning that we wanted Parliament to work and there can be no greater indication of Parliament working or not than whether the budget passes," he said. "The NDP indicated that they want Parliament to work."

Martin says, in effect, that the NDP is helping him make the case that two parties are engaged in constructive politics, while the Bloc and the Tories are on a more destructive bent.

"That's what's happened here. When we came into office, everybody said, all the parties, with the exception of the Bloc, said they wanted Parliament to work. The Bloc said they'd do everything to get in our way. And they've tried, they've done it. Now recently the Conservatives have joined with the Bloc. They've changed their minds and they've essentially said that working hand in hand with the Bloc to frustrate Parliament is the way they want to operate," he said.

Martin's day of media interviews yesterday was part of what's become a week-long blitz to regain some grip on a government perched to collapse ever since an outbreak of public fury over revelations from the Liberal sponsorship-scandal inquiry. Ushering journalists in and out of his office yesterday, Martin appeared relaxed and non-plussed. He was surprised by the suggestion that some Liberals are in despair these days. "You mean in terms of the next election?" he said, shaking his head.

Recent polls show the federal Liberals' support hovering between 25 to 30 per cent nationwide, with Tories in the 35-per-cent range. It was only the rare poll that put the Liberals below 30 per cent during last year's election, but Martin seemed adamant that things were much bleaker then than today.

His optimism may also be rooted in a slight trend, emerging in some of this week's polls, which indicate the Liberals may have bottomed out and be on a slight rebound.

Most commentators believe, however, it's still too early to tell whether Martin's recent attempts at damage control have boosted Liberal fortunes in any significant way.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adscam; barfalert; canada; canuckistan; corruption; dithers; liberalbias; loonyleft; paulmartin; stephenharper; theft
Here we go again!!!

Mr. Dithers cannot wrap himself in the flag like this!!! He is the key to Quebec separation!!! If he gets away with this (with the help of the MSM) we should try to force ourselves into statehood!

1 posted on 04/28/2005 10:17:32 AM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83
More Toronto Red Star tripe. Speaking of which, did you all hear that the Red Star asked www.FreeDominion.ca to prevent their forum members from posting their articles? I guess they couldn't take the criticism. ; )
2 posted on 04/28/2005 7:26:08 PM PDT by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

That is disturbing as they are trying to force their NDP-style agenda onto their readers...and cannot take criticism at all...although the Globe and Mail is pretty close to them nowadays in ideology, at least from a social perspective...


3 posted on 04/28/2005 7:29:30 PM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83

This "values" arguement won't work in Western Canada including Vancouver. At least in Vancouver they are socialists, but not anti "everything that seems American." Atlantic Canada doesn't count because they vote for who will bribe them the most. Toronto and the GTA is the target of this values arguement. Many, many immigrants in Toronto (nearing 50% of the population of Toronto) hate the US. Many were rejected by US Immigration. Many are socialists, such as many Eastern Europeans and many British Immigrants who "fled" the Thatcher Years.
One-Tier Health Care is primarily an Ontario concern.
I am afraid Martin did the math and knows he can win on the Anti-American platform.


4 posted on 04/29/2005 3:50:36 PM PDT by rasblue (What would Barry Goldwater do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rasblue

Unfortunately, those 45 seats are the bedrock of the Fiberal support...


5 posted on 04/29/2005 4:43:06 PM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83

Harper has to tell the people of Canada that voting liberal=quebec separation. Of course he must do that DURING the election campaign.


6 posted on 04/29/2005 4:45:46 PM PDT by youngtory (Liberals in Conservative clothing are bigger liars than the liberals themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rasblue
Canadians are the stupidest, pettiest lot of people. George Bush has NOTHING to do with our most prevalent issues and problems - yet this works on Canadians. For all the crow about wanting to stop negative campaigning here's why it continues - because it works. Ontarions were scared off of Harper at the last minute last summer. Personally, I don't watch CTV or CBC and change my mind like the wind every time a politician says something. I made up my mind LOOONG ago, by paying attention to the issues that matter.

Atlantic Canada still wants to give 44% of their vote to the Liberals. You people are hopeless.

I don't understand why a conservative party can only muster 30% of the popular vote in this country. It's not even the fiscal and social conservative party it was in the beginning of the Reform years. Not as red as the Red Tory party, but it is watered down to make it more palatable to socialist Canada. And it's still not good enough. Is it that the CP wants to stop the gravy train to the Ontario auto industry? Maybe wants a Canada for all Canadians - not just Ontario and the teat sucking maritimes?
7 posted on 04/30/2005 11:28:56 AM PDT by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83

Only in Ontario does this gain votes for the Liberals. The rest of Canada saw the deal as a sell out on the backs of the Canadians taxpayer.


8 posted on 04/30/2005 11:31:16 AM PDT by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson