Posted on 04/26/2005 5:02:47 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
ST. PETERSBURG - The mother of the 5-year-old girl who was handcuffed at school by police has withdrawn her daughter from Pinellas public schools and is moving out of state, superintendent Clayton Wilcox said Monday night.
The development was the latest in a bizarre saga that began Friday, when a videotape of the handcuffing was made public.
Since then, wrenching video images of the wailing kindergartener being handcuffed by St. Petersburg police have raced around the globe, airing and re-airing on television news shows in the United States, Great Britain, Spain, around Asia and beyond.
On Monday morning, the Largo lawyer representing the girl's mother appeared on five network news shows. He returned wearily to his office to find a fax from the mother, 24-year-old Inga Akins, stating he had been fired. The fax had been sent from the tabloid TV show A Current Affair, on which the mother appeared Friday and Monday.
Also on Monday came the prospect that the Rev. Al Sharpton would be coming to town. The famous New York crusader and one-time presidential candidate is intrigued and considering weighing in on the episode, his staff said.
"Instantly he felt that it smelled bad, but he wants to research it first," said his spokeswoman Rachel Nordlinger. "It could be a case of police brutality or a case of her civil rights being violated."
Wilcox had no further information on Akins' move to pull the girl out of school. She was handcuffed at Fairmount Park Elementary on March 14 and transferred to another public school after the incident.
Wilcox said he found out about her leaving the system when he asked his staff Monday how she was doing in the new school.
A call to Akins' cell phone went unreturned Monday night.
Pinellas County records show that a St. Petersburg apartment complex where she lived moved to evict her on March 31, about two weeks after the handcuffing that put her daughter's face on TV screens across he world.
Wilcox said the girl had been out of school since Thursday.
John Trevena, who had been serving as the attorney for Akins, said he learned from an executive producer at A Current Affair that the girl and her mother traveled to New York City over the weekend, where they stayed at the show's expense.
The case of the handcuffed little girl was the top story on the tabloid program Monday night, with images of the girl smelling a flower and running through a park laughing.
The show interviewed a child psychologist who said the handcuffing might be racially motivated. A Current Affair also said the girl "had to flee her home to escape the media."
The show blamed Trevena's release of the video to major media outlets last week, including the St. Petersburg Times . The lawyer said a producer from the show "raged" at him last Friday, saying the release of the video violated an exclusive agreement between Akins and A Current Affair.
Trevena said he had been unaware of any agreement.
The show made no mention of its part in the media frenzy that has followed the video.
A Current Affair clearly communicated it had every intention of running the videotape, Trevena said. He also said the show interviewed Akins and her daughter only days after the handcuffing incident.
On Friday, a few hours after the video began screaming across the world, the show announced to the media that it had an exclusive.
It sent out a news release titled: "Five-year-old African American girl handcuffed by three police officers. A Current Affair gets first national look at incident on tape."
The program Monday evening did not disclose on air how much it had paid Akins for the story. When asked what the sum was Monday afternoon, a spokeswoman for the show laughed at the question. She said there would be no comment on the story.
Trevena called the program's actions "highly unethical and possibly illegal." He said he was concerned that his client was in New York discussing the case with another party without legal advice.
The videotape shows the girl defying an assistant principal and another school staff member as she tore items off walls and swung at the educators.
Later, it shows the girl in the assistant principal's office tearing items off a bulletin board, climbing on a table and swinging at the assistant principal numerous times.
The video ends after about 28 minutes with the girl crying as three St. Petersburg police officers place her in handcuffs.
The girl had a history of problems at the school, though the full extent is not known because student records are not public.
District officials have discussed an incident several weeks before the handcuffing in which a city police officer was called to the school because of a behavior problem with the girl. The officer said something to her about the possibility of being handcuffed if her behavior continued.
Akins later objected to that conversation, part of an ongoing feud with the school over her daughter's treatment.
District officials say the video started as an exercise by the girl's teacher to improve her craft in the classroom. But they acknowledge that the girl's history may have played a part in the decision to keep the camera rolling that day.
Though city police are being harshly criticized for their role in the incident, the department declined Wednesday to elaborate on the rationale for the handcuffing, citing a pending investigation.
Police spokesman Bill Proffitt said the department stood by a statement made in mid March, which was that department policy allows the handcuffing of minors in certain situations.
How did an incident that received mild attention in March blossom into a worldwide phenomenon five weeks later?
The video, said Matthew Felling, media director at The Center for Media and Public Affairs in Washington, D.C.
"It's not necessarily about the little girl, it's about the visceral nature of it," he said. "Is it compelling? Yes. Is it emotional porn? Yes. Is it internationally relevant news? No."
He said too many media outlets had been airing only part of the video, which is about 28 minutes long.
"This story is driven by 10 seconds of footage - two seconds of the tantrum and eight seconds of handcuffing," he said. "Completely taken out of context, but that is the media's way."
I'm amazed at what parents don't know. Some really do look like deer in the headlights and the nanny suggestions are so simple that you wonder why it never occured to them. It's like looking for car keys that are right in front of one's face *lol* There was one lady with four children that were so out of control OMG.
With a name like Buffy I am sure she wouldn't be looking for a job anymore than a guy named Biff would be:). If you knew "white" america you would know that we veiw names such as Buffy and Biff as jokes, and largely fictional, and I would bet that very few resumes, if any, have ever seen the name Buffy printed on them. The really telling part of your comment is the white america crap. America is america and we should not be white american or black or green or brown or red or blue americans but simply americans.
As far as the poster who was going on about the names I believe his basic premise is correct and has nothing to do with whether someone is white or not, but the perception of the person dealing with a name such as Laquisha and Raquisha, which by the way are the names of two relatives, twins, of my girlfriends(she is black, I am white). By the way my girlfriend hates these type of names and calls them ghetto and makes fun of them.
The point the poster was trying to make was that people have prejudices, doesn't matter what color they are, and one of those prejudices is against names that sound different than what they are used to. Thus a strange sounding name may work against a person who is A.) not responsible for their name to begin with and B.) may have more ability and acumen then any other person we know.
I do not believe the poster was against the names so much as pointing out that lots of other people will be prejudicial when dealing with names such as these.
I myself don't care what someone is called(even if they are named Buffy) and accept or reject someone on their merits, as I see them of course. Thanks for listening.
I had a neighbor who has since died who loved nothing better than to sit on her front porch and watch my kids play. We'd take her a dish of ice cream and sit and talk with her after supper. We need more of this.
As a society, we have become too disconnected from our generations and our families and we lose so much because of it.
Now THAT is a visual . . . Mama Cyborg trying to swat you with a broom while you're under the bed wearing your tinfoil beanie! "Come out from under there!"
Her sisters, of course, are Maui Wowie and Thai Stick.
Buffy and Biff are nicknames, not given names. Buffy's real name is probably something like Barbara, and Biff is probably Benjamin H. Farnsworth, IV.
Unlike made-up names, the nicknames Buffy and Biff will never appear on any resume.
The feeling of displaced rejection perhaps.
Tiger did tie the knot with a blond woman of Northern European descent.
So are you saying that it IS worth watching? Good old fashioned common sense? If so, maybe I'll find out when it's on and give it a watch.
My mom was hardcore. She'd be screaming wait till you have kids! I hope they come out just like you... the eternal curse :o) I didn't get beat for the tinfoil hat thing BUT I did get buns burned for playing supergirl (when were living on the top floor of an apartment building).
I think it's worth watching. I have the naughty seat filed in the back of my head. I had a naughty seat when I was little. It was murder too because I could never sit still *lol*
Please tell me you didn't jump off the roof. PLEASE.
BTW, one time (when I was a very mouthy teen) my mother told me that she hoped I had kids just like me.
I told her that'd never happen, 'cause I planned to do a better job raising them.
What happened to me next I leave to your imagination, but I bet your mother would have responded just like mine did. Ouch.
Nope but according to her I was heading to the window :o)
Looks like family names are out but I did notice a couple of biblical names on the list. Personally I prefer Jawaana or Jatisha to some of the bland names on this list.
Last week I had a visit from my youngest daughter who is 23. She was going through some old boxes of her "stuff." Before she left, she came in and said, "You know, I have been reading some of the stuff I wrote when I was a teen (journals, notes to friends, etc.), and I can't believe what a miserable person I was at times.
That recognition on her part means she has really grown up. It also means that I guess I did my job pretty well, after all.
The next time I travel to Tampa, I'll visit the store again and ask her.
One time on the Florida Turnpike I stopped at one of the oasis's to buy gas, and they had a checkout girl working there named Silvermoon.
But please, don't take up residence in NY. We have enough parasites and badly behaved children!
Yes and unfortunately not enough jobs.
tee hee : ) I think I like mom!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.