Posted on 04/26/2005 5:02:47 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
ST. PETERSBURG - The mother of the 5-year-old girl who was handcuffed at school by police has withdrawn her daughter from Pinellas public schools and is moving out of state, superintendent Clayton Wilcox said Monday night.
The development was the latest in a bizarre saga that began Friday, when a videotape of the handcuffing was made public.
Since then, wrenching video images of the wailing kindergartener being handcuffed by St. Petersburg police have raced around the globe, airing and re-airing on television news shows in the United States, Great Britain, Spain, around Asia and beyond.
On Monday morning, the Largo lawyer representing the girl's mother appeared on five network news shows. He returned wearily to his office to find a fax from the mother, 24-year-old Inga Akins, stating he had been fired. The fax had been sent from the tabloid TV show A Current Affair, on which the mother appeared Friday and Monday.
Also on Monday came the prospect that the Rev. Al Sharpton would be coming to town. The famous New York crusader and one-time presidential candidate is intrigued and considering weighing in on the episode, his staff said.
"Instantly he felt that it smelled bad, but he wants to research it first," said his spokeswoman Rachel Nordlinger. "It could be a case of police brutality or a case of her civil rights being violated."
Wilcox had no further information on Akins' move to pull the girl out of school. She was handcuffed at Fairmount Park Elementary on March 14 and transferred to another public school after the incident.
Wilcox said he found out about her leaving the system when he asked his staff Monday how she was doing in the new school.
A call to Akins' cell phone went unreturned Monday night.
Pinellas County records show that a St. Petersburg apartment complex where she lived moved to evict her on March 31, about two weeks after the handcuffing that put her daughter's face on TV screens across he world.
Wilcox said the girl had been out of school since Thursday.
John Trevena, who had been serving as the attorney for Akins, said he learned from an executive producer at A Current Affair that the girl and her mother traveled to New York City over the weekend, where they stayed at the show's expense.
The case of the handcuffed little girl was the top story on the tabloid program Monday night, with images of the girl smelling a flower and running through a park laughing.
The show interviewed a child psychologist who said the handcuffing might be racially motivated. A Current Affair also said the girl "had to flee her home to escape the media."
The show blamed Trevena's release of the video to major media outlets last week, including the St. Petersburg Times . The lawyer said a producer from the show "raged" at him last Friday, saying the release of the video violated an exclusive agreement between Akins and A Current Affair.
Trevena said he had been unaware of any agreement.
The show made no mention of its part in the media frenzy that has followed the video.
A Current Affair clearly communicated it had every intention of running the videotape, Trevena said. He also said the show interviewed Akins and her daughter only days after the handcuffing incident.
On Friday, a few hours after the video began screaming across the world, the show announced to the media that it had an exclusive.
It sent out a news release titled: "Five-year-old African American girl handcuffed by three police officers. A Current Affair gets first national look at incident on tape."
The program Monday evening did not disclose on air how much it had paid Akins for the story. When asked what the sum was Monday afternoon, a spokeswoman for the show laughed at the question. She said there would be no comment on the story.
Trevena called the program's actions "highly unethical and possibly illegal." He said he was concerned that his client was in New York discussing the case with another party without legal advice.
The videotape shows the girl defying an assistant principal and another school staff member as she tore items off walls and swung at the educators.
Later, it shows the girl in the assistant principal's office tearing items off a bulletin board, climbing on a table and swinging at the assistant principal numerous times.
The video ends after about 28 minutes with the girl crying as three St. Petersburg police officers place her in handcuffs.
The girl had a history of problems at the school, though the full extent is not known because student records are not public.
District officials have discussed an incident several weeks before the handcuffing in which a city police officer was called to the school because of a behavior problem with the girl. The officer said something to her about the possibility of being handcuffed if her behavior continued.
Akins later objected to that conversation, part of an ongoing feud with the school over her daughter's treatment.
District officials say the video started as an exercise by the girl's teacher to improve her craft in the classroom. But they acknowledge that the girl's history may have played a part in the decision to keep the camera rolling that day.
Though city police are being harshly criticized for their role in the incident, the department declined Wednesday to elaborate on the rationale for the handcuffing, citing a pending investigation.
Police spokesman Bill Proffitt said the department stood by a statement made in mid March, which was that department policy allows the handcuffing of minors in certain situations.
How did an incident that received mild attention in March blossom into a worldwide phenomenon five weeks later?
The video, said Matthew Felling, media director at The Center for Media and Public Affairs in Washington, D.C.
"It's not necessarily about the little girl, it's about the visceral nature of it," he said. "Is it compelling? Yes. Is it emotional porn? Yes. Is it internationally relevant news? No."
He said too many media outlets had been airing only part of the video, which is about 28 minutes long.
"This story is driven by 10 seconds of footage - two seconds of the tantrum and eight seconds of handcuffing," he said. "Completely taken out of context, but that is the media's way."
I think the teachers video taped this incident to show the world how bad classrooms have become and how impotent teachers are with out of control kids. The legal system and the school system have created this situation. It's all for the good of the children, you know.
I wrote: No five-year old of mine ever had a tantrum or hit any adult. I say the school did the right thing and so did the cops. Putting the child in handcuffs was the wisest thing to do. Laws have rendered our teachers powerless. They cannot lay a finger on children without being reprimanded, fired, and/or sued. And the easiest way to remove her from the premises was to handcuff her. There is no other action that could have been taken. As litigious as our society has become it was a "damned if you do; damned if you don't" situation."
After I sent this email, they had some so-called "expert" on the show who was outraged about the actions of the police and E.D. makes the comment that most people are agreeing that the actions were way over the top.
Later on in the day, the incident is again mentioned on Linda Vester's show. And again, there is outrage expressed by that feminist Wendy whats-her-name that the little girl was treated horribly.
I emailed Dayside and said Wendy is wrong. The mother's behavior is teaching the little girl that her behavior is acceptable and that it is ok to question authority figures. What the cops did is called tough love and sometimes it is necessary. If the mother had backed up the police, she would have been telling her daughter that this behavior was NOT going to be accepted any longer.
Again, there were the appropriate ooh, aahhs, and awwws in favor of the little girl.
This bothered me greatly. It showed that the media was already gearing up to support the little girl and her mother. Now, that the truth is emerging, the media is ready to waffle the other way. This is an important story and many lessons could be learned from it if reported accurately.
Why do we have a society where so many kids are out of control? This is why.
I wonder if we could possibly get them to leave the country, instead of just the state? Probably not...no other place would tolerate the nonsense we do.
I did think of Condoleeza, actually. Interestingly, her name DOES mean something, in Italian, I believe. I don't know the meaning. I do suspect that her name has probably been more of an obstacle than a blessing, at least early on. Her raw talent, intelligence and ability were more than enough to overcome any challenges her name may have provided. Just think how much easier things might have been had her name been Judith or Mary.
I generally agree. But I've found that I need Mr. Spanky as a last resort. It depends on the child.
That kind of coverage is a big reason I often have the T.V. turned off.
To some liberal educator's mind, this is an ideal 'learning' experience so the other kids can learn diversity and tolerance to others in the classroom. To say it was a disruption is to deny this 5 year old's right to expression and will reinforce a negative stereotype in the minds of the other children.
Did I capture the essence of PC education?
Our trial lawyer nation.
[[The mother of the 5-year-old girl who was handcuffed at school by police has withdrawn her daughter from Pinellas public schools and is moving out of state, superintendent Clayton Wilcox said Monday night.]]
No geographic cure will work for this out of control kid and her out of control mother. The same thing will happen in some other school in some other state. The mother and her victimhood mentality are the root cause of the problem.
What state is this worthless mother going to subject he this brat to a school district?
IF I were to make a judgement based on the video,I would say our school system is full of wacked out educators who don't know how to deal with a 5 year old who needs a nap.
You said: but that comment was the rude opinion of one poster and he/she doesn't speak for the rest of us.
I wasn't trying to be rude. I wish it weren't true, but those who get these crazy "ethnic" names are saddled with a burden they must overcome. Remember the song Boy Named Sue? This isn't much different, to my mind. Children who are given these names do fine within their communities with Anfernee, Ant'won and Chiloquethia, but if they are talented and able, mainstream society doesn't value the creativity of the ethnic community in the same way. I am not suggesting it is right, only that it is an avoidable problem.
I believe they did and Inga said she couldn't leave work before 3 o'clock.
This is also the same scholl board that, through school choice, tripled the bussing costs of kids. Instead of one bus picking up kids at one stop, you can have up to 5 busses picking kids up from the same location, but to different schools.
This is the same schoolboard that, in the aftermath of several student deaths at school bus stops, has done nothing. They have routes where 5 year old students have to cross 6 lane highways to get to their bus, in direct violation of their own written rules. Like I said, several kids have been hit and killed becasue of the school boards's complete contempt for parents and students in this county.
Condoleezza is a style of classical music. It means, in italian, to play "with sweetness". Rice's mother was a pianist and Condi was taught piano from an early age. Apparently, her parents gave her a name that had much meaning to them, but I would agree that she probably had many people say to her 'your name is what'? Peace.
From the video it looks like she was off her medication.
So, what do you think about Tiger Woods' name?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.