Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another GOP senator hesitates on Bolton (Sen. Murkowski)
MSNBC ^ | 4/22/05

Posted on 04/22/2005 3:44:52 PM PDT by Crackingham

President Bush's nomination of John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations was put in further peril Friday when a fourth Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee expressed concern about him and a former Bush ambassador called his behavior "undiplomatic."

A spokeswoman for Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said the senator felt the committee “did the right thing delaying the vote on Bolton in light of the recent information presented to the committee.”

Asked if Bolton had Murkowski’s support, spokeswoman Kristin Pugh said, “I can’t speculate on how she would vote.”

She said Murkowski was traveling and could not be reached.

Before the recent allegations that Bolton threatened and bullied subordinates and sought to influence U.S. intelligence assessments improperly, Pugh said Murkowski had met with Bolton and expressed support. But since then, she said, Murkowski decided the accusations merit further examination.

Pugh said Murkowski has discussed the nomination with Sen. George Voinovich, the Ohio Republican who stunned lawmakers when he said he was not prepared to support Bolton as Republicans were set to muscle the nomination through the committee on a party-line vote. Republican Sens. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska also said they wanted more information on the accusations before they made up their minds.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bolton; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 04/22/2005 3:44:52 PM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

They're not called "The Stupid Party" for nothing.


2 posted on 04/22/2005 3:45:31 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan

I think Bush needs to do some whip cracking here and let them know that he is in charge of the Party.


3 posted on 04/22/2005 3:48:11 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Well if he doesn't the Washington Post won't write an nice editorial about him. What's he supposed to do? /sarcasm


4 posted on 04/22/2005 3:48:18 PM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Just yank them off any comittee they are on.

Tell them *mabye* they'll get it back with repeated good behavior.


5 posted on 04/22/2005 3:49:32 PM PDT by FreedomNeocon (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Pubbies are revolting.





6 posted on 04/22/2005 3:49:48 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
So, let's see what this situation is all about. Bolton was somebody's boss. Secretary Powell was Bolton's boss. Bolton had some difficult staffers who needed to be disciplined or transferred elsewhere. Powell became aware of the situation.

This sort of thing happens frequently throughout the federal bureaucracy. The big boss has two obvious things he can do ~ the first is to let it happen, and the staffers go elsewhere. The second is to discipline the boss.

Well, that's what it would seem like, but in the federal government, even in State Department, the boss has a third option ~ forget about it!

And that's apparantly what Powell did up until the New York Times and a couple of their bought and paid-for Senators bothered him.

Now the Internet and the Blogsphere click in and Powell is rapidly finding out that he'd never before been on such a public stage.

Isn't this the same situation Powell got into over Mei Lei? ~ he just kinda' tried to forget about it.

You'd think he'd know better by now.

7 posted on 04/22/2005 3:50:07 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Stevens is getting up there in years. He looks fine, though, and is sharp as a tack. But, when he retires, Alaska is going to be in big trouble without the pork. Murkowski, who knows, she is still creating her senateness.


8 posted on 04/22/2005 3:50:10 PM PDT by RightWhale (50 trillion sovereign cells working together in relative harmony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

The GOP won't have a true majority in the senate until they have over 50 non-RINO's.


9 posted on 04/22/2005 3:50:19 PM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
This is really a secret plan whereby the Republicans are systematically aggregating Senate members to the new standard of conduct. ..No impolitic discourse...No caustic denunciations...No vitriolic disagreements.

This secret plan is to then hold democrats to the new requirements they have set forth. Yeah, that's the ticket, a secret plan. Our side is so friggin' smart.

10 posted on 04/22/2005 3:50:48 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon

But...but...but then the MSM will attack the President!


11 posted on 04/22/2005 3:51:12 PM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Crackingham

I just called the Anchorage office. Im under the impression, based on the conversation I just had, that she will vote against it..


13 posted on 04/22/2005 3:52:12 PM PDT by cardinal4 (George W Bush-Bringing a new democracy every term..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GABaptist

My mistake! I see the name and think of her father.


14 posted on 04/22/2005 3:52:58 PM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

The limp sister, pretending to enjoy her moment with W.

15 posted on 04/22/2005 3:54:33 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Voinovich is starting to take too much heat...so the 'boys' need another freshman senator to 'take one for the team'... play bad cop....and take up the slack.


16 posted on 04/22/2005 3:55:13 PM PDT by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Looks like a whole herd of rinos is headed our way.


17 posted on 04/22/2005 3:58:00 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Looks like a whole herd of rinos is headed our way.


18 posted on 04/22/2005 3:58:19 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Honest question:

If the GOp refuses to stand up and not kowtow to political pressures from non-GOPers then why should I vote for the GOP in November?


19 posted on 04/22/2005 4:00:00 PM PDT by Bogey78O (*tagline removed per request*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
I hope I do not have to say "The Rep.Party Sucks"
But if they do hold fast on Delay and Bolton and do something about the immigration, I will say it.
At the same time they will lose power and deserve.
Venting on your post area Dr. Frank,sorry but thanks
20 posted on 04/22/2005 4:01:36 PM PDT by gibonski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson