Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New superlens opens door to nanoscale optical imaging and high-density optoelectronic devices
UC Berkeley Press Release ^ | April 21, 2005 | Sarah Yang

Posted on 04/22/2005 2:03:48 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou

– A group of scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, is giving new relevance to the term "sharper image" by creating a superlens that can overcome a limitation in physics that has historically constrained the resolution of optical images.

Schematic drawing of nano-scale imaging using a silver superlens
Schematic drawing of nano-scale imaging using a silver superlens that achieves a resolution beyond the optical diffraction limit. The red line indicates the enhancement of "evanescent" waves as they pass through the superlens. (Images by Cheng Sun, UC Berkeley)

Print-quality image available for download

Using a thin film of silver as the lens and ultraviolet (UV) light, the researchers recorded the images of an array of nanowires and the word "NANO" onto an organic polymer at a resolution of about 60 nanometers. In comparison, current optical microscopes can only make out details down to one-tenth the diameter of a red blood cell, or about 400 nanometers.

The breakthrough, reported in the April 22 issue of the journal Science, opens the door to dramatic technological advances in nanoengineering that could eventually lead to DVDs that store the entire contents of the Library of Congress, and computer processors that can quickly search through such a huge volume of data, the researchers said.

"The field of optics is involved in much of today's technology, including imaging and photolithography, which is used to make semiconductors and integrated circuits," said Xiang Zhang, UC Berkeley associate professor of mechanical engineering and principal investigator of the study. "Our work has a far reaching impact on the development of detailed biomedical imaging, higher density electronic circuitry and ever-faster fiber optic communications."

Comparative images of nanowire arrays
At left (A) is an image of an array of nanowires 60 nanometers wide created with the silver superlens. The center distance between each nanowire is 120 nanometers. To the right (B) is an image of the same nanowires. In this image, created without the superlens, the individual nanowires are not distinct. The scale bar on both images is 1 micrometer.

Nicholas Fang, one of Zhang's former Ph.D. students and lead author of the paper, said a nearer term application would be the development of medical imaging devices that could reveal never-before-seen details with optical microscopy.

With current optical microscopes, scientists can only make out relatively large structures within a cell, such as its nucleus and mitochondria. With a superlens, optical microscopes could one day reveal the movements of individual proteins traveling along the microtubules that make up a cell's skeleton, the researchers said.

Scanning electron and atomic force microscopes are now used to capture detail down to a few nanometers. However, such microscopes create images by scanning objects point by point, which means they are typically limited to non-living samples, and image capture times can take up to several minutes.

"Optical microscopes can capture an entire frame with a single snapshot in a fraction of a second," said Fang, who is now an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. "That opens up nanoscale imaging to living materials, which can help biologists better understand cell structure and function in real time, and ultimately help in the development of new drugs to treat human diseases."

the word NANO created with and without a silver superlens
At top (A) is the higher resolution image of the word NANO created with a silver superlens. Below that (B) is an image created during a control experiment in which the superlens is replaced by spacer layer. The averaged line width is 60 nanometers in image A with the superlens, and 321 nanometer in image B without the superlens. The scale bar in both images is 2 micrometers.

The study is the latest entry in a hotly debated topic among physicists and engineers surrounding the creation of a lens that can break the so-called diffraction limit of optics through negative refraction.

Conventional lenses, whether manmade or natural, create images by capturing the propagating light waves all objects emit and then bending them. The angle of the bend is determined by the index of refraction and has always been positive.

Yet objects also emit "evanescent" waves that carry a great deal of detail but are far more elusive. Such evanescent waves decay exponentially and thus never make it to the image plane, an optics threshold known as the diffraction limit. Breaking this diffraction limit and capturing evanescent waves are critical to the creation of a 100-percent perfect representation of an object, considered the Holy Grail in optics.

In 2000, British physicist John Pendry theorized that a material capable of a negative index of refraction could capture and "refocus" evanescent waves into a perfect image. Pendry's proposed "perfect lens" theory came more than 30 years after Russian physicist Victor Veselago first conceived of a negative refraction material that could reverse known optical phenomena.

These theories are based on the fact that when electromagnetic waves of light reach the surface of a negative refraction lens, they excite a collective movement of surface waves, such as electron oscillations, also known as surface plasmons. That results in an enhancement of the evanescent waves and is different from the way light typically behaves when it reaches a conventional lens.

Various negative refraction experiments were later conducted by researchers at UC San Diego, Boeing and Northeastern University, but they were limited to microwave beams.

In 2003, Zhang's group was the first to confirm that optical evanescent waves are enhanced as they pass through a silver superlens in carefully designed conditions.

But it wasn't until this latest experiment by Zhang's group that optical imaging with a superlens was demonstrated. Zhang and his research team used UV light at a 365-nanometer wavelength in the new experiments, so the image created actually has more detail than is possible with beams in the microwave range.

The array of nanowires imaged measured 40 nanometers wide and the word NANO was about 60 nanometers wide. The objects, embedded onto a layer of chrome, were placed before the superlens, which was a layer of silver that was about 35 nanometers thick. The researchers recorded the image onto a photoresist, a polymer coating on the other side of the superlens that becomes insoluble when exposed to UV light.

"Our work provides a new imaging method that can beat the optical diffraction limit and that has tremendous potential to revolutionize a wide range of technologies," said Zhang. "The key to the superlens is its ability to significantly enhance and recover the evanescent waves that carry information at very small scales. This enables imaging well below the diffraction limit."

Notably, no lens is yet able to completely reconstitute all the evanescent waves emitted by an object, so the goal of a 100-percent perfect image is still out there. However, many scientists believe that a true perfect lens is not possible because there will always be some energy absorption loss as the waves pass through any known material.

"We did not create a perfect image in our experiment," said Fang. "But it's clear that our image is dramatically better than the one created without the silver superlens."

In the long run, this line of research could lead to even higher resolution imaging for distant objects, the researchers said. This includes more detailed views of other planets as well as of human movement through surveillance satellites.

Other authors of the paper are Hyesog Lee, a graduate student in mechanical engineering, and Cheng Sun, a research scientist in Zhang's group.

The research was supported by the Office of Naval Research, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative, and the National Science Foundation Center for Nanoscale Science and Engineering.



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: astromony; biology; computers; dvd; medicine; nanotech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Facinating. Enjoy
1 posted on 04/22/2005 2:03:49 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Lancey Howard

Nanotech Ping.


2 posted on 04/22/2005 2:08:36 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

This is great, PeaceBeWithYou. It's exciting thinking about how this technology could impact future medical research applications.


3 posted on 04/22/2005 2:15:17 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Good. Hopefully it can be used to futher the study of prions (protiens) whose 'folds" just can't be seen at the moment.
As far as making things smaller, I can hardly see my cell phone as it is!


4 posted on 04/22/2005 2:20:39 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
"A group of scientists "

Xiang Zhang
Nicholas Fang
Dr.Cheng Sun
Yi Xiong
Dr. Hui Liu
Yongmin Liu
Junyu Mai
Sheng Wang
Hyesog Lee

See the trend here?

UC Berkeley Xlab:

http://xlab.me.berkeley.edu/ http://xlab.me.berkeley.edu/Publications/Publications/Science-superlens.pdf

5 posted on 04/22/2005 2:26:48 AM PDT by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Interesting. Going to have to bone up on this concept of negative index of refraction. Since the index of refraction is simply the ratio of the speed of light in the medium in question vs the speed of light in a vacuum, c, and c is NOT a negative number, that means for negative refraction media, the speed of light through that material would have to be negative. Wow.


6 posted on 04/22/2005 2:32:47 AM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
I spy with my really little eye...
7 posted on 04/22/2005 3:02:25 AM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Carnac: A siren, a baby and a liberal. Answer: Name three things that whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation

Wrong positive/negative, it is right vs. left handed. The speed of light is the same, but the direction of refraction is different.


8 posted on 04/22/2005 3:03:13 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
When lasers first came out in the '60's,  everyone was talking about ray-guns.  We still don't have ray-guns but we do have microchips, disc storage, and fiber optics.

I'm hoping these nano lenses can take us to new horizons also.

9 posted on 04/22/2005 5:01:43 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
See the trend here?

Put all those together and it would make quite a name for a law firm.

10 posted on 04/22/2005 5:12:16 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

It's all a scam just like the internet. Buy gold. /sarc


11 posted on 04/22/2005 5:12:59 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

You don't think this could lead to hand held "ray" guns?

Darn it!


12 posted on 04/22/2005 5:14:49 AM PDT by Durus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Better here than over there.


13 posted on 04/22/2005 5:14:49 AM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Hooray for the ONR!


14 posted on 04/22/2005 5:30:46 AM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
See the trend here?

Yeah. They're all Californians.

15 posted on 04/22/2005 5:57:09 AM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Nano nano.
16 posted on 04/22/2005 6:14:05 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

But they're OUR Chinese, who are better than THEIR Chinese. ;^)


17 posted on 04/22/2005 6:25:51 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Thanks for the ping. I donno if this is for the science list or not, but I've re-configured the ping list logo and I want to use it, so I'll let 'er rip.


18 posted on 04/22/2005 6:29:10 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing
An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's description at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.

19 posted on 04/22/2005 6:30:42 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou; PatrickHenry

Dammit, and I was just weeks away from completing my own superlens last year, when the dog knocked over my workbench and ruined everything. Set me back months. Sigh.


20 posted on 04/22/2005 6:48:30 AM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson