Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New superlens opens door to nanoscale optical imaging and high-density optoelectronic devices
UC Berkeley Press Release ^ | April 21, 2005 | Sarah Yang

Posted on 04/22/2005 2:03:48 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Facinating. Enjoy
1 posted on 04/22/2005 2:03:49 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Lancey Howard

Nanotech Ping.


2 posted on 04/22/2005 2:08:36 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

This is great, PeaceBeWithYou. It's exciting thinking about how this technology could impact future medical research applications.


3 posted on 04/22/2005 2:15:17 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Good. Hopefully it can be used to futher the study of prions (protiens) whose 'folds" just can't be seen at the moment.
As far as making things smaller, I can hardly see my cell phone as it is!


4 posted on 04/22/2005 2:20:39 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
"A group of scientists "

Xiang Zhang
Nicholas Fang
Dr.Cheng Sun
Yi Xiong
Dr. Hui Liu
Yongmin Liu
Junyu Mai
Sheng Wang
Hyesog Lee

See the trend here?

UC Berkeley Xlab:

http://xlab.me.berkeley.edu/ http://xlab.me.berkeley.edu/Publications/Publications/Science-superlens.pdf

5 posted on 04/22/2005 2:26:48 AM PDT by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Interesting. Going to have to bone up on this concept of negative index of refraction. Since the index of refraction is simply the ratio of the speed of light in the medium in question vs the speed of light in a vacuum, c, and c is NOT a negative number, that means for negative refraction media, the speed of light through that material would have to be negative. Wow.


6 posted on 04/22/2005 2:32:47 AM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
I spy with my really little eye...
7 posted on 04/22/2005 3:02:25 AM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Carnac: A siren, a baby and a liberal. Answer: Name three things that whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation

Wrong positive/negative, it is right vs. left handed. The speed of light is the same, but the direction of refraction is different.


8 posted on 04/22/2005 3:03:13 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
When lasers first came out in the '60's,  everyone was talking about ray-guns.  We still don't have ray-guns but we do have microchips, disc storage, and fiber optics.

I'm hoping these nano lenses can take us to new horizons also.

9 posted on 04/22/2005 5:01:43 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
See the trend here?

Put all those together and it would make quite a name for a law firm.

10 posted on 04/22/2005 5:12:16 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

It's all a scam just like the internet. Buy gold. /sarc


11 posted on 04/22/2005 5:12:59 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

You don't think this could lead to hand held "ray" guns?

Darn it!


12 posted on 04/22/2005 5:14:49 AM PDT by Durus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Better here than over there.


13 posted on 04/22/2005 5:14:49 AM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Hooray for the ONR!


14 posted on 04/22/2005 5:30:46 AM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
See the trend here?

Yeah. They're all Californians.

15 posted on 04/22/2005 5:57:09 AM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Nano nano.
16 posted on 04/22/2005 6:14:05 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

But they're OUR Chinese, who are better than THEIR Chinese. ;^)


17 posted on 04/22/2005 6:25:51 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Thanks for the ping. I donno if this is for the science list or not, but I've re-configured the ping list logo and I want to use it, so I'll let 'er rip.


18 posted on 04/22/2005 6:29:10 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing
An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's description at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.

19 posted on 04/22/2005 6:30:42 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou; PatrickHenry

Dammit, and I was just weeks away from completing my own superlens last year, when the dog knocked over my workbench and ruined everything. Set me back months. Sigh.


20 posted on 04/22/2005 6:48:30 AM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson