Skip to comments.
New superlens opens door to nanoscale optical imaging and high-density optoelectronic devices
UC Berkeley Press Release ^
| April 21, 2005
| Sarah Yang
Posted on 04/22/2005 2:03:48 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Facinating. Enjoy
To: blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Lancey Howard
2
posted on
04/22/2005 2:08:36 AM PDT
by
PeaceBeWithYou
(De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
To: PeaceBeWithYou
This is great, PeaceBeWithYou. It's exciting thinking about how this technology could impact future medical research applications.
3
posted on
04/22/2005 2:15:17 AM PDT
by
bd476
To: PeaceBeWithYou
Good. Hopefully it can be used to futher the study of prions (protiens) whose 'folds" just can't be seen at the moment.
As far as making things smaller, I can hardly see my cell phone as it is!
To: PeaceBeWithYou
"A group of scientists "Xiang Zhang
Nicholas Fang
Dr.Cheng Sun
Yi Xiong
Dr. Hui Liu
Yongmin Liu
Junyu Mai
Sheng Wang
Hyesog Lee
See the trend here?
UC Berkeley Xlab:
http://xlab.me.berkeley.edu/ http://xlab.me.berkeley.edu/Publications/Publications/Science-superlens.pdf
5
posted on
04/22/2005 2:26:48 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
To: Nathan Zachary
Interesting. Going to have to bone up on this concept of negative index of refraction. Since the index of refraction is simply the ratio of the speed of light in the medium in question vs the speed of light in a vacuum, c, and c is NOT a negative number, that means for negative refraction media, the speed of light through that material would have to be negative. Wow.
To: PeaceBeWithYou
I spy with my really little eye...
7
posted on
04/22/2005 3:02:25 AM PDT
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Carnac: A siren, a baby and a liberal. Answer: Name three things that whine.)
To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
Wrong positive/negative, it is right vs. left handed. The speed of light is the same, but the direction of refraction is different.
8
posted on
04/22/2005 3:03:13 AM PDT
by
PeaceBeWithYou
(De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
To: WestVirginiaRebel
When lasers first came out in the '60's, everyone was talking about ray-guns. We still don't have ray-guns but we do have microchips, disc storage, and fiber optics.
I'm hoping these nano lenses can take us to new horizons also.
To: endthematrix
See the trend here? Put all those together and it would make quite a name for a law firm.
10
posted on
04/22/2005 5:12:16 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: PeaceBeWithYou
It's all a scam just like the internet. Buy gold. /sarc
11
posted on
04/22/2005 5:12:59 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: expat_panama
You don't think this could lead to hand held "ray" guns?
Darn it!
12
posted on
04/22/2005 5:14:49 AM PDT
by
Durus
To: endthematrix
Better here than over there.
13
posted on
04/22/2005 5:14:49 AM PDT
by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: PeaceBeWithYou
To: endthematrix
See the trend here? Yeah. They're all Californians.
15
posted on
04/22/2005 5:57:09 AM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
To: PatrickHenry
Nano nano.
16
posted on
04/22/2005 6:14:05 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: endthematrix
But they're OUR Chinese, who are better than THEIR Chinese. ;^)
17
posted on
04/22/2005 6:25:51 AM PDT
by
Jabba the Nutt
(Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
To: Joe Brower
Thanks for the ping. I donno if this is for the science list or not, but I've re-configured the ping list logo and I want to use it, so I'll let 'er rip.
18
posted on
04/22/2005 6:29:10 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. See the list's description at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
19
posted on
04/22/2005 6:30:42 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: PeaceBeWithYou; PatrickHenry
Dammit, and I was just weeks away from completing my own superlens last year, when the dog knocked over my workbench and ruined everything. Set me back months. Sigh.
20
posted on
04/22/2005 6:48:30 AM PDT
by
general_re
("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson