Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil Hits 8-Week Low Sub-$50, Funds Begin Retreat
Reuters ^ | April 18, 2005 | Joanne Collins

Posted on 04/17/2005 10:43:07 PM PDT by RWR8189

MELBOURNE (Reuters) - Oil prices extended a losing streak on Monday, falling briefly to an eight-week low under $50, as growing supplies outweighed worries of rising global demand.

U.S. light crude futures traded as low as $49.66 a barrel, the lowest since Feb. 22, before recovering to $50.15, down 34 cents from Friday's close.

Brent crude was down 39 cents to $51.22 a barrel, after losing 59 cents on Friday.

U.S. crude oil prices have fallen around 14 percent from an all-time peak of $58.28 hit two weeks ago, driven by swelling crude stocks and signs of a sharper-than-expected decline in China's oil demand growth.

"People who bought in at the highs are probably getting a bit nervous now," said David Thurtell, Sydney-based commodities strategist with the Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

"U.S. stocks are building pretty comfortably... I guess you wouldn't rule out prices getting to $47 or $48 over the next couple of weeks."

Data on Friday from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission showed noncommercial crude oil speculators cutting their net long positions by a little over 29,000 to 59,650 in the week to April 12. Big money fund speculators had held a record 88,712 net longs in the previous week in a bet that prices would go higher.

Societe Generale said in a research note that the recent strengthening of the U.S. dollar had encouraged funds to take profits on commodities globally. Copper slid to a two-month low last week, while zinc and aluminum also fell heavily.

Oil's slide has made it less likely that OPEC producers, which control half of global exports, would increase supplies before ministers are due to meet in June.

HEADWIND

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries raised formal output limits last month by 500,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 27.5 million bpd in a bid to cool prices and left room for another 500,000-bpd increase before the June 15 talks if prices failed to drop below $55. Kuwait's state news agency KUNA on Saturday quoted OPEC spokesman Abdel-Rahman al-Khreiji as saying he expected "the increase will be postponed for the present time in the event that oil prices continue to fall."

OPEC member Algeria told state radio on Saturday that OPEC should consider increasing output from June to cope with a seasonal rise in demand at the end of the year during the northern hemisphere winter.

Saudi Arabia, OPEC's biggest exporter, said last week it would boost its May crude supplies by 10 percent or more -- effectively putting as much as 500,000 bpd of new oil on the market -- to help build stocks before the expected end-year demand surge.

Despite the latest retreat, oil prices are still 15 percent higher than at the end of 2004 on expectations that demand in the United States and China, the world's biggest consumers, will keep producers and refiners working at full throttle.

Finance ministers from the Group of Seven industrialized nations meeting in Washington at the weekend said record oil prices were a "headwind" facing the global economy but said the outlook for economic growth was healthy.

"The global expansion has remained robust, and the outlook continues to point to solid growth for 2005," the G7 said in a statement issued after the meeting.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brent; cartel; commodities; crude; crudeoil; energyprices; funds; gas; gasoline; hedgefunds; lightsweetcrude; marketnews; middleeast; nigeria; northsea; nymex; oil; oilcartel; oilinventory; opec; speculation; speculators; supply; wti

1 posted on 04/17/2005 10:43:09 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Well healed hedge-funds will continue to drag crude oil prices down to the level where they feel the next set of 'calls' will be lucratively affordable to profit from the next round of bullishness.

The current 'put/call' range seems to be $7 to $11. ($57-$45) or slightly lower.

2 posted on 04/17/2005 11:04:52 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola
The secular drift is (gasp) North.


3 posted on 04/17/2005 11:33:19 PM PDT by nathanbedford (The UN was bribed and Good Men Died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Does anyone think this will effect prices at the pump? Not a chance. Prices are up and will stay there.


4 posted on 04/17/2005 11:41:56 PM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

Prices are down nearly 20¢ a gallon around here this week.


5 posted on 04/17/2005 11:44:41 PM PDT by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
I view this current pullback in oil stocks as a long-term buying opportunity. The latest selling down into the $50 range seems to be based on fears of a significant global economic slowdown. I don't think that slowdown is actually going to happen anytime soon. The stock market often sells off after a few days of consistently weak economic data, only to rally when new data is released that shows a fairly strong economy. I'm expecting that to happen again, producing a stock market rally later this month followed by a bounce in oil prices back above $53.

A lot of oil stocks look like good long-term values here. By that I really mean long-term, and these stocks may go lower this spring before ending the year 10-25% higher than they are right now.

6 posted on 04/17/2005 11:45:04 PM PDT by defenderSD (The worst song I ever heard is Rod Stewart singing "Wonderful World".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

No change in gasoline prices yet here in Arizona. We get most of our gas from refineries in California which are running at full capacity. CA is importing gasoline from Venezuela and other places. Oil companies won't even attempt to build new refineries in California because of all the environmental regulations and the threat of tort litigation. I read that somebody is building a small refinery in Yuma, AZ near the California border. That may help us a little in the years ahead. Long term we'll probably end up piping in more gasoline from West Texas.


7 posted on 04/17/2005 11:48:37 PM PDT by defenderSD (The worst song I ever heard is Rod Stewart singing "Wonderful World".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
I view this current pullback in oil stocks as a long-term buying opportunity.

It is if Chinese demand keeps rising. But if China implodes or stalls, there will be no prop for oil prices.

8 posted on 04/18/2005 12:24:19 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

I do a little oil brokering to pass the time of day and to collect a few coins. Right now the Chinese are trying to dump alot of the crude they've purchased on contract. Don't know if it's economics or simply refining capacity? The pricing of a single hull vessel is now running $130K a day and double hull VLCC's are running up to $205K a day if you can charter one.


9 posted on 04/18/2005 1:05:02 AM PDT by politicalwit (USA...A Nation of Selective Law Enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit
Since you are kinda in the "know" in the oil market.Would you keep us updated on oil prices in the future.

I hear the Canadians are going after their oil sand potential.They say those reserves are second only to Saudi reserves.

10 posted on 04/18/2005 7:31:37 AM PDT by painter (We celebrate liberty which comes from God not from government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
I read that somebody is building a small refinery in Yuma, AZ near the California border. That may help us a little in the years ahead.

The permit for that refinery has been issued. That means it's still a LONG way away from actually being built. Lots and lots of legal mischief for the envirowhacks to get up to before ground is even broken on that refinery.

11 posted on 04/18/2005 7:36:13 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC (Ted Kennedy and the New York Times do NOT select our next Pope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
"Lots and lots of legal mischief for the envirowhacks to get up to before ground is even broken on that refinery."

That's right, I forgot that the faint traces of gasoline vapor from the refinery could cause anxiety in migratory birds resting on the surface of the Colorado River. Not to mention that noise from the refinery may irritate the endangered insect species nearby and.....

12 posted on 04/18/2005 2:22:09 PM PDT by defenderSD (The worst song I ever heard is Rod Stewart singing "Wonderful World".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson