Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary orchestrating Tom DeLay attacks?
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 15, 2005 | staff

Posted on 04/15/2005 8:41:55 AM PDT by Nachum

Recent attention given to House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, in the mainstream media is being orchestrated by Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., as a means to be sure the House is in Democratic hands when she runs for president in 2008, a source in the GOP leadership says.

Geopolitical analyst Jack Wheeler, publisher of intelligence website, To the Point, says one of DeLay's colleagues told him:

"Hillary's fingerprints are all over it. She has no intention of having to deal with an opposition party controlling the House as her husband did for six years and Ronald Reagan did for eight. She has a very clear plan for seizing control of the entire United States government, which includes orchestrating Democrat control of the House in 2006 so it is firmly in place when she is elected president in 2008."

Wheeler says such a scenario would ensure passage of the senator's so-called HillaryCare health-care legislation nationalizing medicine in the U.S.

"There was absolutely no doubt in [the source's] mind that Hillary is running – not will run, but already is running – for president in 2008," writes Wheeler in his column. "'This should be obvious to everyone,' he said, 'but what is not obvious is that's not all she's doing. Her focus and her goals go far beyond just the White House.'"

Continues Wheeler: "It is, then, at Hillary's direction that the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the entire Liberal Media apparatus are waging a relentless war upon House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. The charges against him are either inconsequential or hypocritical – huge front page outrage stories, for example, about him going on a foreign 'junket' with no criticism of Democrats who were on the very same trip, such as Nancy Pelosi. Last week the WaPo ran this above-the-fold headline piece thousands of words long that was pure recycled froth with no substance whatever.

"That's because the substance doesn't matter – all that matters is the attacks themselves, that they be kept up until more and more spineless pencil-necks like Connecticut Republicans Chris Shays and Rob Simmons break and crack under pressure. Hillary knows exactly what she is doing. Target the strongest force the GOP has in Congress – DeLay – keep targeting until Republicans surrender and retreat in disarray, then pick up the easy pieces in 2006."

DeLay has taken heat from both media and Democratic lawmakers for alleged ethics violations and his role in trying to save the life of Terri Schiavo.

"There's much more at stake than just Tom DeLay," Wheeler told WND.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: attacks; comradehillary; delay; dontlookathereyes; findhillarysthesis; hillary; hillaryisqueenbee; hitlery; jackwheeler; orchestrating; saveamerica; stophillary; tom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/15/2005 8:41:56 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I hope DeLay will survive and thrive!!!


2 posted on 04/15/2005 8:43:23 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Rest in Peace, Theresa Marie SCHINDLER - IMPEACH JUDGE GREER!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Already posted here a few posts before.
3 posted on 04/15/2005 8:45:25 AM PDT by BJClinton (Giuliani/DeLay 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Gosh...If Bush doesn't get his a$$ in gear on border control, we're liable to end up with "barrel legs" for president in 08.


4 posted on 04/15/2005 8:46:11 AM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton
I did a search, but the FReeper who posted it changed the title!

It's not my fault!!! (I wasn't there, you can't prove anything)

5 posted on 04/15/2005 8:47:18 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Nachum

I have it on good information that there is a certain person in the WH political office that feels that Delay is now a major threat to the President's agenda and that that person is in part responsible for some of the media attacks (by leaking info or telling where to look) in the hopes that Delay will step down. That's the reason some Republicans have been emboldened to speak ill of Delay. The WH told them they would be protected.

I trust my source far more than WND. Also, i could see Delay's people as a plant for this story. What better way to rally the troops than to say Hilary is responsible!

Whatever happens I hope it doesn't get too messy.


7 posted on 04/15/2005 8:52:58 AM PDT by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

As someone on National Review pointed out, after 8 years of Clintons we now have a Republican Congress, White House and many more statehouses (as well as conservatives across the board) but the Clintons are still waving their crooked fingers; they're shameless. Expect more of the same.


8 posted on 04/15/2005 8:56:29 AM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Hah! I have screen shots! lol


9 posted on 04/15/2005 8:56:43 AM PDT by BJClinton (Giuliani/DeLay 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The left and its friends in the MSM are recovering from the 2004 election and this attack on Delay looks like a probing assault by which they're testing their strategy and effectiveness. If Delay survives, expect something completely different next time in preparation for 2006.


10 posted on 04/15/2005 8:57:15 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton; Nachum

I was wondering why the title was different in both threads, even though they are the exact same articles. Then I noticed that Nachum copied the title from the WND's home page while the other thread poster copied the title from the article


11 posted on 04/15/2005 9:09:26 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
(I wasn't there, you can't prove anything)

LOL! Deny, deny, deny......

12 posted on 04/15/2005 9:23:59 AM PDT by b4its2late (The original point and click interface was a Smith and Wesson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeLurker

I trust my source far more than WND. Also, i could see Delay's people as a plant for this story. What better way to rally the troops than to say Hilary is responsible!


I like my source better!!!! President Bush who stood on TV and backed Delay this week. You must be McCain's lacky.


13 posted on 04/15/2005 9:49:28 AM PDT by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

DeLay should be running in '08, at least as VP IMHO. He's the strongest leader in the GOP.

The red states see right through Hitlery.


14 posted on 04/15/2005 10:44:52 AM PDT by SweetPilotofCanuckistan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; BJClinton
"I think for me, the sickest and scariest kind of rage is the Hillary Clinton kind of rage. You know, the perpetual permafrost smile she wears that's hiding a well of fury deeper than Barry White's voice during a bout of pneumonia." -- Dennis Miller

"What can you say about Hillary Clinton that hasn't already been muttered under somebody else's breath?" -- Dennis Miller

15 posted on 04/15/2005 10:44:53 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Advanced Directive -- don't step on my blue suede shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Friday April 15 2005

HILLARY CLINTON: A ROLE MODEL FOR FULL DISCLOSURE?

In yesterday's commentary chronicling the tempest surrounding Tom DeLay, I clipped a quote from an aide to Speaker Hastert that appeared in the Chicago Tribune. What caught my attention most, however, was something reporter Jill Zuckman wrote in the paragraph that followed. Here's the whole thing:

But a senior aide to Hastert said DeLay may need to make some public explanations about the charges since the House ethics committee has been unable to organize itself with Democrats protesting Republican-instituted rule changes.

"I'm not sure why he doesn't lay it out, regardless of whether the ethics committee ever meets or not," said the Hastert official, who spoke on condition of not being identified.

"Take whatever there is and say, `Here it is,'" the official said. "You have to at one point say, `Here I am, here it is, what's the question.'"

That strategy recalled the approach taken by former First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton in the 1990s when she was plagued by questions about unusual profits made from cattle futures. Hastert's adviser, however, rejected the comparison. (emphasis added)

Hillary Clinton randomly cited as a model for full disclosure? This is bizarre. Since Zuckman doesn't attribute it to anyone else, we have to assume she's the one who drew the comparison. More bizarre is that even after Hastert's aide rejected the idea, Zuckman wrote it into the piece anyway.

So what about it: did Hillary lay out all the facts when the cattle future story hit the fan? That's not how I recall it. This NR piece from February 1995 seems to confirm Mrs. Clinton was less than forthcoming:

Has there been any effort to suppress investigation of the transaction? Yes. Mrs. Clinton was adamantly opposed to the appointment of a special prosecutor to look into her and her husband's financial dealings, including her own trading activities, during the late 1970s and 1980s. She attempted to deflect attention from the matter by explaining away her newfound wealth as a gift from her parents, until the Clintons' 1978 and 1979 tax returns were made public and the actual source of her windfall profit was revealed.

Furthermore, despite our repeated and friendly requests to both the First Lady's and the White House's press representatives, none of our questions concerning the elementary details of Mrs. Clinton's trades and the availability of original documentation has been answered.

So what would possess Zuckman to recall Hillary Clinton as a role model of "full-disclosure"? More to the point: how does this little nugget of historical revisionism in any way qualify to be part of a "straight" news story on Tom DeLay?
-- T. Bevan 8:45 am

© 2000-2005 RealClearPolitics.com All Rights Reserved
16 posted on 04/15/2005 11:11:03 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Makes sense to me. Hillary is a controller and a manipulator. she has the resources to do this kind of stuff. Wouldn't put it past her.


17 posted on 04/15/2005 1:09:29 PM PDT by timtoews5292004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timtoews5292004
taking back the House in '06 is part of the plan to more easily put shewhomustnotbenamed in the oval office. of course the hildebeast is involved in the attacks on DeLay.

over the next year, plan to have fun watching the RATS try to morph themselves into "people of faith" and having the same religious values as conservative Christians.

18 posted on 04/15/2005 2:16:31 PM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

DeLay has taken heat from both media and Democratic lawmakers for alleged ethics violations and his role in trying to save the life of Terri Schiavo.

He has taken a fair amount of heat from individuals who claim to be Republicans and from members of this forum also.

If the Republicans had one Tom Delay in the Senate, all of President Bush's judicial nominees would have already been confirmed.

One Tom Delay is worth a dozen John McCains, in my opinion.


19 posted on 04/15/2005 2:24:35 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
"Her focus and her goals go far beyond just the White House."

Uh, oh...


20 posted on 04/15/2005 2:31:58 PM PDT by Libloather (Start Hillary's recount now - just to get it out of the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson