Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Happy ending for 'grandma'? ( Dehydration & Starvation case similar to Terri )
WorldNetDaily ^ | April 14, 2005 | Sarah Foster

Posted on 04/14/2005 3:32:36 PM PDT by FR_addict

It appears there will be a happy ending to the story of Ora Mae Magouirk, the 81-year-old Georgia widow whose family has been at loggerheads over her medical care, visitation privileges and whether she should be "allowed to die" but now is reaching agreements on key issues.

Today, attorneys on both sides agreed Magouirk's brother and sister, A.B. McLeod, 64, of Anniston, Ala., and Lonnie Ruth Mullinax, 74, of Birmingham, will be allowed to visit their sister during regular visiting hours at the University of Alabama-Birmingham Medical Center in Birmingham, where she is receiving treatment for an aortic dissection.

Moreover, Jack Kirby, attorney for McLeod and Mullinax, told WorldNetDaily that under terms of the agreement, his clients will be allowed to talk directly to Magouirk's doctors about her condition, as opposed to having such information "filtered through third parties."

As reported by WND, when Magouirk was airlifted and admitted to UAB Medical Center on Saturday, her granddaughter and legal guardian, Beth Gaddy, 36, of LaGrange, Ga., left an oral order barring Magouirk's siblings and her nephew, Ken Mullinax, 45, of Birmingham, from visiting the patient in the critical care unit.

Ruth Mullinax has been a patient at UAB for the same condition, brought on, says her son, by the stress she's suffered worrying about her sister.

Kirby said he talked to Ruth Mullinax yesterday, and "she's doing very well." He did not comment on her sister's condition.

However, relatives say it appears Magouirk is pulling through, despite her aortic dissection and the starvation and dehydration she endured from March 28 to April 6 at Hospice La-Grange, where she was placed by her granddaughter.

McLeod told WND the two women visited yesterday in Magouirk's room, and "Ora Mae recognized [Ruth Mullinax} and they laughed and chatted briefly together. etc..."

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dehydration; greer; mae; magouirk; schiavo; schindler; terri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: mtbopfuyn

They must be related. Scary thought, if we are now hearing about 2 cases within a few weeks of each other, how many are really going on across the country?


41 posted on 04/14/2005 6:43:01 PM PDT by Libertina (Washington State... Western branch office of FloriDUH elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Sorry, Ms. Gaddy. Apparently, Jesus wasn't ready for your grandma yet. All she needed was some medical care and oh yes, FOOD AMD WATER! The very first thing Mae needs to do is find a good attorney who will revoke Ms. Gaddy's guardianship and give it to someone who doesn't want to Mae into a hospice. The next thing is to investigate the judge who granted that emergency medical power of attorney in such suspicious circumstances. There are several people who ought to have to answer for their shameful actions in this case.


42 posted on 04/14/2005 6:55:40 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uvular
And why did a hospice accept a patient that, as far as we know, was not diagnosed as 'soon to die'?

I suspect that at some hospices, all patients are "soon to die", regardless of their health when they enter.

43 posted on 04/14/2005 7:49:26 PM PDT by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
She certainly needs to revisit her Living Will. It's a confusing document, and she may not really want to be starved and dehydrated, EVEN IF she is in a coma or PVS.

And even if she had wanted such a think, her recent experience may change her mind.

I do hope her relatives can talk to her in front of a camcorder, though. Even if she weren't considered to be of sound mind, an oral recitation that she did not want to be starved or dehydrated under any circumstances, especially if she said further that she never wanted to be [the latter commnent would mean that even if she wasn't deemed fit to override the living will, the ambiguity in its language caused its marking to be other than intended].

44 posted on 04/14/2005 7:54:27 PM PDT by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

ping


45 posted on 04/14/2005 9:39:48 PM PDT by jewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsladybug; Libertina
It wasn't a judge that ruled in her favor. It was an attorney subbing in for the judge. That made the whole thing seem so curious.

First, the normal, ordinary and common scenario has the lawyer for one of the parties draft the final order for the judge to sign. That's right. The judge doesn't even write the order, the winning party does.

In Mae's case, the first order came from the language in Gaddy's Petition for Emergency Guardianship. There was no adverse party in that proceeding, held on Friday, April 1st.

The second hearing was on Monday, April 4. This proceeding starred out as adversarial, and Mae's attorney filed an Objection to Gaddy's Motion for Guardianship. However, the case was not litigated. Mae's side made a tactical decision to shift the medical treatment decision out of the judge's hands and into the hands of a team of doctors. In hindsight, that was a good tactical move. So, also in that case, the final order was drawn up by attorneys on both sides.

Following that, quite a few people "went public," including Judge Boyd. Once he went public with more than the contents of the written orders, he lost the cloak that hides possible bias.

46 posted on 04/15/2005 5:17:29 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
The next thing is to investigate the judge who granted that emergency medical power of attorney in such suspicious circumstances. There are several people who ought to have to answer for their shameful actions in this case.

This judge did fine under the circumstances. The problem people are the doctors and hospice, first for the medical opinion that Mae was better off dead, then starting the death process without legal authority.

47 posted on 04/15/2005 5:19:57 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I wonder if Mae will be changing her will now.


48 posted on 04/15/2005 5:42:44 AM PDT by agrace (All I have seen teaches me to trust the Creator for all I have not seen. - Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: agrace
I wonder if Mae will be changing her will now.

I figure she'll be changing a number of things. In one way, the family is lucky. They will draw closer and have some quality time together. More intense love than most, and able to share it. Most of us are too busy with our own activities, and have short-lived epiphanies at and following funerals. Then it's back to the normal grind.

49 posted on 04/15/2005 5:48:27 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pickyourpoison

bookmark


50 posted on 04/15/2005 5:54:49 AM PDT by pickyourpoison (" Laus Deo ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

I just don't understand why the law about next of kin wasn't followed. What's the point in spelling these relationships out if they can be so easily circumvented?

Mae's brother and sister were fully capable of acting as guardians.


51 posted on 04/15/2005 6:04:07 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Don't retire to Florida. They murder their "useless eaters".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Good question.


52 posted on 04/15/2005 6:09:51 AM PDT by agrace (All I have seen teaches me to trust the Creator for all I have not seen. - Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

BTTT


53 posted on 04/15/2005 6:11:57 AM PDT by auboy (Snap to, spineless RINOs. Even Barney Fyffe had one bullet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Never sign a "Living" Will! It can be your death sentence. Instead, get a Will to Live from the National Right to Life committee website.


54 posted on 04/15/2005 6:15:01 AM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (You should be TERRIfied that you may someday be SCHIAVOed to death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Great news. As I said before, Freepers were once again ahead of the game. Great work guys. Saving a life is more important than anything.


55 posted on 04/15/2005 6:44:31 AM PDT by yellowdoghunter (FR is so popular that people repost our thoughts on different message boards! It is an honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; FR_addict

I'm so glad Grandma Mae is getting better. Someone posted on this thread that Mae's estate is worth a quarter of a million dollars. I wonder how much life insurance Beth took out on her granny?


56 posted on 04/15/2005 7:28:40 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Free Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

More of a chance now than Terri had.


57 posted on 04/15/2005 7:51:08 AM PDT by Twinkie (With God all things are possible. Yay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
I just don't understand why the law about next of kin wasn't followed. What's the point in spelling these relationships out if they can be so easily circumvented?

The court was blindsided on Friday the 1st. It only had Gaddy's side (with help from hospice-biased cousel) of the issue in front of it. The court assumes the guardian will act in the patient's best interests. "Patient's best interests" is a legal term of art that is construed to favor medical treatment, UNLESS the patient has made a clear and convincing statement to the contrary. That is, "best interests of the patient" is not "better off dead," as a matter of law.

The circumvention here has not been completed, and as far as I know, guardianship still lies with Gaddy. However, the guardian is bound to adhere to doctor's orders, where the doctors are biased toward treating Mae and giving her a physically comfortable life. I am pretty sure Gaddy will be out as guardian at some point in the future.

58 posted on 04/15/2005 10:56:11 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots; little jeremiah; schmelvin; eeevil conservative; BykrBayb; ExPatInFrance

Have you guys seen this new one? Since you were some of the key freepers on the grandma story, I wanted to make sure you guys saw this one.

I'm going to go ahead and post it.

http://www.laraza.com/news.php?nid=21715
Terri Schiavo’s case in Chicago
In a house on Chicago’s southeast side, a Mexican family is going through a heartbreak like the tragedy that befell the American Terri Schiavo’s family and deeply affected both those who defend the right to life and partisans of euthanasia. But no voices had been raised so far in this case because very few knew about the situation concerning the 39-year-old Latin woman whose husband decided to disconnect the tube that had been feeding her during her three and a half years in a vegetative state.


59 posted on 04/15/2005 1:26:25 PM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Para la gente que puede leer esta frase, favor de cuidar a aquella mujer. Su vida vale la pena. Hay que mostrar a los estadounidenses que la vida !si! tiene valor.

For those who can read this sentence, please care for that woman. Her life is worth the trouble. You must show those in the US that yes, life has value.


60 posted on 04/15/2005 2:36:44 PM PDT by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson