Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

60 Years Ago This Week....
The History Channel? | 13 April 2005 | Yasotay

Posted on 04/13/2005 6:24:31 PM PDT by Yasotay

Sixty years ago, the US Ninth Army had two bridgeheads across the Elbe River. One was crushed and the other secured. The sixty year old question remains: Should and could we have beaten the Soviets into Berlin?


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: berlin; bradley; churchill; eisenhower; elbe; hitler; koniev; militaryhistory; patton; roosvelt; simpson; stalin; truman; wwii; zhukov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last
I believe we should have tried .... And your opinion is?
1 posted on 04/13/2005 6:24:32 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Yasotay

We should have turned Patton loose on them AFTER they got to Berlin.


2 posted on 04/13/2005 6:27:36 PM PDT by Slump Tester (John Kerry - When even your best still isn't good enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay
Considering the number of troops they lost fighting the die-hard (and they did) remnants of the Third Reich, we shouldn't have any regrets.
3 posted on 04/13/2005 6:28:24 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay
Berlin was an enormous city. The Deutschlanders said they were prepared to defend it to the death on the ground.

I think they were, and tried to. Glad to see the Russians belly up to the bar on that one ~ means a lot of American boys grew up with fathers FUR SHUR.

4 posted on 04/13/2005 6:28:39 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay

If I recall my history correctly, this issue was already settled by an agreement with the Soviet forces approaching from the East, Was it Potsdam?

Anyways we were probly better off since the Soviets took horrendous losses taking the capitol,
I remember reading figures in excess of 350,000.

Am sure some friendly FReeper will correct me if I am wrong/


5 posted on 04/13/2005 6:32:29 PM PDT by 76834
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I was stationed in Berlin for three years and studied the battle extensively. The battle inside (except for some pockets like the Reichstag) of Berlin was a "Mopping Up" exercise. The actual "Battle for Berlin" was decided long before the Soviet Offensive on the 16th of April.
6 posted on 04/13/2005 6:36:26 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay

No. The Soviets were our allies.

We were exhausted and still had to finish the war in the Pacific.

Lines had to be drawn,and they were.


7 posted on 04/13/2005 6:38:17 PM PDT by Mears ("The Killer Queen,caviar and cigarettes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay
FWIW......60 years ago yesterday, FDR died at the age of 63. What was the impact of that on the path to Berlin?

Lando

8 posted on 04/13/2005 6:39:17 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln (How many liberals does it take to win a war?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay
EUROPE: The great German arsenal city of Essen fell today in the wake of three American armies racing over the last 100 miles to Berlin at a clip that was expected to bring a juncture with the Red Army in the next 24 to 72 hours (April 11) ...

American Ninth Army tanks smashed through the Elbe river defenses today, striking into the last 50 miles before Berlin, and Lt. Gen. George S. Patton’s Third Army splintered Germany’s east front supply lines with a 46-mile dash for Halle and Leipzig (April 12) ...

A solemnly hushed house of commons adjourned five minutes after it had convened in London in respect to the memory of President Roosevelt (April 13) ...

Gen. Mark W. Clark announced today that the “spring offensive in the Mediterranean theatre has begun,” with the U.S. Fifth and British Eighth armies engaged in operations along the entire Italian battlefront (April 16).

World War II Remembered

9 posted on 04/13/2005 6:41:45 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay

The Soviets claim the battle of Berlin cost them a million casualties, after which they raped and pillaged the place.


10 posted on 04/13/2005 6:42:05 PM PDT by albertabound (It's good to beeeee Albertabound.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

Wouldnt have worked!
At that time the Soviet forces were the most massive and powerful land force on earth.

Had Patton attacked the Soviets he would have suffered the same fate the Germans did at Kursk


11 posted on 04/13/2005 6:43:24 PM PDT by 76834
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 76834

Yalta .... but even Churchill wanted Ike to take Berlin.


12 posted on 04/13/2005 6:43:24 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay
The battle of concern took place on the "approaches" and not in the city. Right?

The Russians were welcome to it.

13 posted on 04/13/2005 6:43:51 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mears

I can't argue with you on those points.


14 posted on 04/13/2005 6:44:55 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay

Thanks for the correction Yasotay.
Been a long long time since I studied history, but some things I learned stand out.

Thanks Again


15 posted on 04/13/2005 6:45:37 PM PDT by 76834
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Hitler celebrated, he thought it was a turning point. He was wrong. I don't think that FDR's death had an impact on the decision to not take Berlin (but I could be wrong).


16 posted on 04/13/2005 6:48:16 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 76834

Patton may have wanted to go for the Soviets, I doubt very much the troops who had fought from North Africa to Germany wanted to. Why should they when they have been told the Russians were our allies?


17 posted on 04/13/2005 6:50:56 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bd476

I think the 2nd AD's bridgehead being crushed on the Elbe tilted Ike to stop. The 83rd ID had a very strong brigehead across the Elbe at Barby. I think that Ike was hoping to take Berlin "On the Fly".


18 posted on 04/13/2005 6:52:21 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Americanexpat

Correct
At that point in the war it would have been totally insane to attack one of our allies, specially since we didnt have the forces in theatre to have the slimmest hope of winning.
The Pacific Front was reaching it's zenith and the Soviets had already agreed to move forces East to help us once the German offensive was over.
And well they did.....


19 posted on 04/13/2005 6:55:25 PM PDT by 76834
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: albertabound
The numbers were huge and the accounts vary. Officially the Soviets say the Battle started on the 16th of April 1945. But even today ... 60 years ago ... Zhukov launched a "Recon in Force" with 30+ BATTALIONS. I believe the real Battle started in late Jan 1945 when the Soviets crossed the Odor.
20 posted on 04/13/2005 6:58:22 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson