Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frist Opposes Amendments on Immigrants
New York Times ^ | April 13, 2005 | By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

Posted on 04/13/2005 3:32:48 PM PDT by Conservative Firster

WASHINGTON, April 12 - Senator Bill Frist, the majority leader, said on Tuesday that he was discouraging efforts to incorporate immigration and border security measures into the Senate version of a supplemental military spending bill, which would set the stage for showdowns among Congressional Republicans over immigration later this year.

Meeting with reporters, Dr. Frist, of Tennessee, said, "I am encouraging my colleagues to defer, to postpone discussions of immigration and to postpone that debate."

He said, however, that he was still negotiating with senators who seek to add immigration provisions to the military spending bill.

The House version of the bill includes provisions to block illegal immigrants from obtaining standard driver's licenses, to make it easier to reject requests for asylum and to override environmental rules blocking construction of a barrier along California's border with Mexico.

Senators from each party seek to add amendments that would make it easier for employers to hire more foreign workers.

The immigration debate reveals a fault line in the Republican Party, pitting cultural conservatives hostile to illegal immigrants against business groups that seek foreign laborers. President Bush has declared his support for a guest-worker program that would be open to currently illegal immigrants.

On Tuesday, Dr. Frist called immigration "a huge issue, an issue that we have to address this year, that the president put a proposal on the table last year - legislatively, we did not address it - I believe we have to address this year."

House Republicans, however, said that negotiators in a conference last year promised that the provisions would be included in some "must-pass" legislation, like the supplemental military spending bill. In negotiations with the Senate, House Republicans added, they were determined to keep the provisions in the final version of the bill.

Senate Democrats want to offer a number of amendments seeking to loosen immigration restrictions or expand foreign-workers programs. Dr. Frist and Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, were in talks on Tuesday night about whether to limit the number of immigration amendments to a handful, with some Democrats seeking assurances that the final bill would not include the House's immigration restrictions, aides said.

Senator Judd Gregg, Republican of New Hampshire, and Senator Barbara A. Mikulski, Democrat of Maryland, said they planned to offer an amendment that would make more visas available for temporary seasonal workers, which they said would be needed by the hotel and fishing industries this summer.

Meanwhile, two Republican senators, John Cornyn of Texas and Jon Kyl of Arizona, advocating the tightening of border security along the lines of the House measures, said they also favored deferring the immigration debate in the Senate and enacting comprehensive measures that would also include some form of Mr. Bush's guest-worker program.

Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform and a conservative strategist working with the White House on its guest-worker proposal, predicted that each side would ultimately succeed only through comprehensive legislation that tightens border security and at the same time adds foreign workers to the labor pool. "Immigration reform and border security are not competitors; they are the same thing," he said.

He said he believed that the House Republican opponents of the guest-worker program would "get boxed out by a bipartisan coalition," and that Mr. Bush could achieve his guest-worker program mostly through strong Democratic support.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; bordersecurity; bushamnesty; frist; illegalaliens; immigration; issues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: DustyMoment

Why do you say that? Most of these amendments would liberalize immigration laws and open the floodgates even more, if that's possible. I'm sort of glad he wants to put them off, it'll give the opposition more time to build a coalition against any scamnesties. They do need to pass the Real ID Act now though...


21 posted on 04/13/2005 4:11:25 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
He wants to put them off until he and Cornyn can manipulate the situation such that they bring a Bush Plan type bill to the floor while excluding the compromise bill. They need more time to do this.

If Sensenbrenner would back off on Real ID, the Senate would back off on attaching the compromise reform bill.

22 posted on 04/13/2005 4:20:45 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I wouldn't say that illegals don't want a good education for their kids, or imply that they're bad at all

Children of Mexican illegals who end up in American big cities generally ruin our schools. Draw your own conclusions.

The Corporate Conservatives and Corporate Liberals are on the same boat with this tacit policy.

True...and - surprisingly - I'm not sure I can criticize them. Markets are now global and American companies must compete with foreign companies which use cheap labor. The best way to do that is to employ cheap labor.

I posted as I did to point out who's suffering from globalization - American workers - and who's benefitting - foreign workers.

There's also a very disturbing statistic; the wealthiest 5% of Americans, and especially the wealthiest 1%, have been increasing their wealth hugely over the last few years while the rest of us have been losing ground.

23 posted on 04/13/2005 4:28:00 PM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
He wants to put them off until he and Cornyn can manipulate the situation such that they bring a Bush Plan type bill to the floor while excluding the compromise bill.

If that's the strategy, and it may be it's doomed to fail. There isn't going to be the kind of liberal guest worker program coming from the House you might get out of the Senate if it has to go through committees.

Those who favor open borders, which appears to be the entire Senate would have a much stronger shot attaching it as an amendment such as this one and taking their chances in Conference.

24 posted on 04/13/2005 4:29:06 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Does anyone have any stats on how much funding is provided to the U.S. Border Patrol? How many employees it has?

I am also curious if privatizing southern border patrol has ever been looked into..

25 posted on 04/13/2005 4:37:26 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Your right. But Bush, Frist, and Cornyn have been saying that the issue needs to be settled on the floor of the House and Senate. That it needs to be a comprehesive, stand alone piece of legislation. Not piece-meal amendments added onto the funding bill.

Its interesting that Norquist mentions something about some democrats that would vote for the Bush plan. I guess that would be Hillary.

You may have seen the Wash Times article posted here overnight in which McCain is quoted as saying "we're ready", in reference to the new compromise bill that he and Kennedy wrote.

I imagine this will be the bill that gets attached. I wonder if I will get a chance to read it before it gets enacted

26 posted on 04/13/2005 4:51:25 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Kennedy and McCain's bill ain't going nowhere, at least I don't think so. That would get stripped in Conference since they want to get the military spending bill through and it would cause too much opposition in the House and hold it up. Besides, they know McCain's only pushing this because he's running for president and thinks sucking up to illegals will get him in. Kennedy's excuse is he's just an A/H.


27 posted on 04/13/2005 5:09:17 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
[Grover Norquist said] each side would ultimately succeed only through comprehensive legislation that tightens border security and at the same time adds foreign workers to the labor pool

I don't like Grover because he's a Muslim stalking horse, but he's right on this one.

28 posted on 04/13/2005 5:09:24 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
The Republicans are fast losing ground, I fear. They are losing the support of many conservatives and that may reflect negatively in the polling booths in 2006 and again in 2008. I worry about our country and the direction in which it continues to head. We are a nation controlled by what is essentially a Judicial oligarchy. The illegal alien situation continues to threaten our borders and culture and it costs us billions in health care, just to name two of the problems associated with it. The symbols of our Christian faith are eradicated one at a time, excised from our public awareness like so many malignant growths. And still every day it seems like we read about yet another GOP elected official going AWOL. Is nothing worth fighting for?
29 posted on 04/13/2005 5:09:37 PM PDT by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

Frist = Larst


30 posted on 04/13/2005 5:15:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

amen


31 posted on 04/13/2005 5:16:59 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster
I guess it's too much to just enforce the laws already on the books.

Politicians sure can waste time and money!

32 posted on 04/13/2005 5:20:38 PM PDT by airborne (Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

Delay= Kill

The longer they wait, the likely it is that some in this country (ourselves for the most part excluded) will let it slide.

Sorry Doc Frist, you just got the kiss off.


33 posted on 04/13/2005 5:24:59 PM PDT by swordfish71 (PRAYERS for TEXAS COWBOY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

Great, it looks like we traded a spineless Republican Majority Leader (Lott) for another spineless Republican Majority Leader. He better hope he doesn't need my vote in '08. We need a Tom DeLay clone in the Senate.


34 posted on 04/13/2005 5:26:13 PM PDT by Reagan is King (Never go to a gun fight with a handgun that uses ammo that doesn't start with a "4")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Senators from each party seek to add amendments that would make it easier for employers to hire more foreign workers.

...both parties have far too much at stake when it comes to whoring themselves to foreign interests. Democrats love the entitlement seeking third world types from Mexico, and Republicans are just as guilty, as they love the almost free labor from these countries.

I don't care what anyone says, we are being sold down the pike for the moneyed intersts in both parties.

Democrats play the race card at every opportunity, and Republicans play the religion card on their core constituents.

It's drawing near where a third party is a viable option.

35 posted on 04/13/2005 5:28:47 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
......and when I say 'religion card', I'm referring to the adopted tactic of the Repub Party..........pretend to hear the voices of Christian Conservatives, maybe turn around from time to time and scare them with some liberal issue. Continue to build the "Big Tent" philosophy (conservatism with a liberal face (?!)

It's a game being run by both parties.

36 posted on 04/13/2005 5:32:50 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Acute Fristoplastoids


37 posted on 04/13/2005 5:38:09 PM PDT by spokeshave (Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
I agree. Norquist is a quisling. But I''m afraid he's right about one thing - the Dims and the Republicans who only care about cheap labor will join and push something through. Those who believe in the integrity of our borders and our citizenship will lose. The future: 100,000,000 Mexicans (the population of Mexico) will have free and unrestricted access to the United States - along with them will come al Quaeda with its WMD.
38 posted on 04/13/2005 5:38:44 PM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
There's also a very disturbing statistic; the wealthiest 5% of Americans, and especially the wealthiest 1%, have been increasing their wealth hugely over the last few years while the rest of us have been losing ground.

Statistically true, and many factors to it. Higher immigration rates on the low end, decline of corporate inhibitions of board members of public companies rating their own worth with ever increasing salaries on the high end, fueled by the end of the corporate culture wherein the boardmember expects to serve the company for life.

39 posted on 04/13/2005 5:39:15 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

Thank you for posting the article by Frank Gaffney---I have frontpagemagazine.com bookmarked, but I hadn't read that one.

What is most scary right now is that the March for Justice that FR was a sponsor for last weekend met up with a group that has Grover Norquist as its spokesman and member--

after reading this, I wonder what Grover and his "friends" will expect from this effort of cleaning up the judciary and getting Bush's nominees a vote----hm........


40 posted on 04/13/2005 5:46:21 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson