Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum: DeLay Needs to Answer Questions
Associated Press ^ | April 10, 2005 | AP

Posted on 04/10/2005 11:07:44 AM PDT by AntiGuv

WASHINGTON - The No. 3 Republican in the Senate said Sunday that embattled House Majority Leader Tom DeLay needs to answer questions about his ethics and "let the people then judge for themselves."

Sen. Rick Santorum's comments seem to reflect the nervousness among congressional Republicans about the fallout from the increased scrutiny into DeLay's way of doing business.

DeLay, R-Texas, has been dogged in recent months by reports of possible ethics violations. There have been questions about his overseas travel, campaign payments to family members and his connections to lobbyists who are under investigation.

"I think he has to come forward and lay out what he did and why he did it and let the people then judge for themselves," said Santorum, chairman of the Senate Republican Conference.

"But from everything I've heard, again, from the comments and responding to those, is everything he's done was according to the law," Santorum told ABC's "This Week."

"Now you may not like some of the things he's done," Santorum said. "That's for the people of his district to decide, whether they want to approve that kind of behavior or not."

DeLay was admonished three times last year by the House ethics committee. He has blamed his woes on Democrats, liberal interest groups and the media.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said last week that the controversy was distracting DeLay from dealing with more pressing problems before Congress.

Santorum, however, said DeLay is "very effective in leading the House" and that "to date, has not been compromised."

A senior Democratic senator, Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, had this advice for the Republicans who control both the House and Senate: "Be careful about how closely you embrace Mr. DeLay."

Dodd cited the new rules for the ethics committee that House Republicans rammed through in the wake of DeLay's difficulties. Those rules require a bipartisan vote before an investigation can be launched. DeLay's office also helped mount a counterattack last fall against Rep. Joel Hefley (news, bio, voting record), R-Colo., who was the ethics committee chairman when it came down against DeLay.

"Unfortunately, in his particular case, there's a process that he's tried to change so they could actually reach a determination as to whether or not he's innocent or guilty of the things he's been charged with," Dodd said. "But this is not going to go away."

DeLay "becomes the poster child for a lot of the things the Democrats think are wrong about Republican leadership. As long as he's there, he's going to become a pretty good target," Dodd said on ABC.

The House leader, who took center stage in passing legislation designed to keep alive Terri Schiavo, also has found that President Bush and congressional colleagues are distancing themselves from his comments, after her death, about judges involved in her case.

"The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior," DeLay said, raising the prospect of impeaching members of a separate and independent branch of government. Later, he complained of "an arrogant and out of control judiciary that thumbs its nose at Congress and the president."

Bush, declining to endorse DeLay's comments, said Friday that he supports "an independent judiciary." He added, "I believe in proper checks and balances."

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee said last week that the judges "handled it in a fair and independent way," although he had hoped for a different result.

Democrats have said DeLay's remarks were tantamount to inciting violence against judges.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: delay; frist; govwatch; santorum; schiavo; ushouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last
Note: Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee said last week that the judges "handled [the Schiavo case] in a fair and independent way," although he had hoped for a different result.
1 posted on 04/10/2005 11:07:45 AM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

That's a real shame, Senator Santorum once had political future.


2 posted on 04/10/2005 11:09:56 AM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus

Wow, we're going to trash a good conservative because he wants DeLay to answer the charges and come clean?

Santorum is a decent, moral man. If he believes DeLay, I appreciate that. But something smells here. We have to get over the knee-jerk reaction that all of our guys do the right thing all the time and all their guys are evil.


3 posted on 04/10/2005 11:12:32 AM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus

He is going to wind up in the unfortunate position of having the deathrats and the immoral media hate him for things he has said in the past, and the conservatives hate him for the pandering he is doing in the present. Of course, the will accept the pandering to get at us, Delay in this case, but they will laughingly slip in the shiv when he wants something from them.


4 posted on 04/10/2005 11:14:51 AM PDT by johnb838 (Santo Subito!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus

Santorum is so worried about beating Casey in the senatorial election he's forgotten who he is. What a pity!


5 posted on 04/10/2005 11:15:46 AM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

For both the Senate and the White House leadership to publicly contradict DeLay, then the chance of them standing by him if the going gets rougher doesn't look good.


6 posted on 04/10/2005 11:17:11 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pa mom

Sen. Santorum has taken every opportunity of late to portray himself as anything but a conservative. I am disappointed by this change and doubt he will find long term support with his new constituency.


7 posted on 04/10/2005 11:17:41 AM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Looks like DeLay's wife and daughter were on the take to the tune of half a million dollars.

Spin that, Big Stupid Republican Government Republicans.

8 posted on 04/10/2005 11:18:45 AM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

How soon they begin to eat their own. Democrats are rotten to the core but at least they know how to be loyal.


9 posted on 04/10/2005 11:19:51 AM PDT by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Too bad Santorum didn't have the huevos to call for the same for Pelosi.


10 posted on 04/10/2005 11:21:36 AM PDT by Nephi (Abortionist's arguments are based in time, but God is eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: AntiGuv

I think its time to hang DeLay out to dry. Otherwise The Hammer's just going to stay in the news, stinking to heaven and hurting Republicans. Loyalty is well and good, but winning elections is more important. He's becoming an embarassment and a liability.


12 posted on 04/10/2005 11:33:53 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

"Looks like DeLay's wife and daughter were on the take to the tune of half a million dollars.
Spin that, Big Stupid Republican Government Republicans."


Since they have (R) next to their names, it's OK, dontcha know?


13 posted on 04/10/2005 11:35:08 AM PDT by Blzbba ("Under every stone lurks a politician. " Aristophanes, 410 BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: AntiGuv
A senior Democratic senator, Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, had this advice for the Republicans who control both the House and Senate: "Be careful about how closely you embrace Mr. DeLay."

STFU dodd. Stick to making waitress sandwiches with ted the drunken murderer. What a a-hole.

FMCDH(BITS)

15 posted on 04/10/2005 11:39:12 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
So does Santorum. I have a few questions myself for Specter's hand puppet.
16 posted on 04/10/2005 11:41:29 AM PDT by Mark in the Old South (Sister Lucia of Fatima pray for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Hank Rearden

They weren't "on the take." They were on the payroll and there is nothing illegal about it. The money came from campaign donations, not tax money.


18 posted on 04/10/2005 11:47:58 AM PDT by lonestar (Me, too!--Weinie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Why should Santorum let DeLay drag him down? DeLay is the one that plays at the edge of legality and house ethics (what an oxymoron). He should explain his behavior and if voters in his district approve, they will continue to vote him in. Why should Santorum accept DeLays morality? What if DeLay had come out in favor of euthanasia or abortion, would you have wanted Santorum keep his mouth shut just because the guy is a Republican leader? I dont think so. DeLay built his bed through his take no prisoners style of politics. Let him live in it.


19 posted on 04/10/2005 11:48:49 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pa mom

Santorum is running afoul. Come clean? Delay openly filed this with the FEC, did you know that?


20 posted on 04/10/2005 11:50:16 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson