Skip to comments.
Hill Slams GOP 'Right Wing Robots'
New York Post ^
| April 10, 2005
| Ian Bishop
Posted on 04/10/2005 2:20:02 AM PDT by BRUMama
April 10, 2005 -- MINNEAPOLIS Sen. Hillary Clinton was introduced by a Senate colleague to the state Democratic Party here as "the next great president of the United States" and did nothing to deny it as she skewered the GOP.
"We are headed to a brave, new world of extremism, and we need to make clear we're not going there," she told a sellout crowd of 2,000 who paid $100 a head to see her. "We stand against their radical, reactionary right-wing agenda."
Clinton sounded every bit the stumping presidential contender as she slammed the Republicans for driving up the national debt, wrecking overseas alliances and leading the nation on a domestic path "well outside the mainstream."
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: berthabutt; broomhilda; candidate; fundraiser; hillary; hillaryscandals; hissinghillary; liberal; president; vrw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
1
posted on
04/10/2005 2:20:03 AM PDT
by
BRUMama
To: BRUMama
To: BRUMama
"We stand against their radical, reactionary right-wing agenda."Unless I need to use them to get elected President. It is then called moving to the center.
If Hillary had divorced Bill Clinton during his Monica days we would all be asking "Hillary who"?
3
posted on
04/10/2005 2:24:43 AM PDT
by
kcvl
To: BRUMama
Why is it every time Hillary comes up, I smell halibut ?
4
posted on
04/10/2005 2:25:39 AM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(*Gregoire is French for Stealing an Election*)
To: BRUMama
My major beef with her isn't usually mentioned, but this article shows this quality in full splendor:
She's boring.
Her rhetoric is boring. Her speaking style is boring. She has no ideas, and is only going to be a force in 2008 because the Dems find her useful (for now) as a being--former First Lady/Senator who is loved by the liberals, for some weird reason.
But take her as simply HRC, and she has not one single interesting quality. She is a liar, she is a backstabber, and her desire for power merely because she desires power makes her one of those soulless politicians everyone claims to hate.
She's boring, that's all there is to it.
5
posted on
04/10/2005 2:30:31 AM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(No faith, but no fears of those who have it)
To: BRUMama
Maybe she will take hormones to deepen her voice , that screech will not get her very far....
6
posted on
04/10/2005 2:38:22 AM PDT
by
Deetes
(Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick)
To: BRUMama; All
And yes, that picture is the one of Hill kissing Suha Arafat ( "wife" of The Littlest Terrorist ) after Suha had accused the Israelis of poisoning Palestinian children...
7
posted on
04/10/2005 2:45:48 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(Just an Undocumented Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
To: BRUMama
Go Hillary Go! Run Hillary Run!
8
posted on
04/10/2005 2:57:20 AM PDT
by
PGalt
(Hillary - posterchild of sociopaths)
To: BRUMama
Bertha Butt strikes again.
9
posted on
04/10/2005 2:58:20 AM PDT
by
Clemenza
(Alcohol Tobacco & Firearms: The Other Holy Trinity)
To: BRUMama
Sen. Hillary Clinton was introduced by a Senate colleague to the state Democratic Party here as "the next great president of the United States" and did nothing to deny it as she skewered the GOP.
Hillary Clinton great at anything besides being a P.I.T.A.? Don't make me laugh.
"We are headed to a brave, new world of extremism, and we need to make clear we're not going there," she told a sellout crowd of 2,000 who paid $100 a head to see her. "We stand against their radical, reactionary right-wing agenda."
More like a cowardly new world of authoritarian socialism. It disturbs me that so many people were willing to pay anything to see her, not to mention that amount.
Clinton sounded every bit the stumping presidential contender as she slammed the Republicans for driving up the national debt, wrecking overseas alliances and leading the nation on a domestic path "well outside the mainstream."
1) Nothing that couldn't be done without Democrat votes. 2)No alliances that really mattered anyways. 3)Oh noes! God forbid we should be outside the mainstream when only a third of the mainstream knows who George Washington was.
She lambasted Republican members of Congress as "extras in the movie 'I Robot' " who "mindlessly rubberstamp the agenda of this administration" and want to do "little more than fund the military and build some highways."
Democrats also fit the bill as rubberstamp robots, opposing anything a Republican says. Democrats don't seem to have their own agenda, they just wait for the Republicans to say something and then yell "NO". Also, apparently Hillary has forgotten that building highways and funding the military constitute the bulk of the government's constitutional duties and powers.
And she scolded President Bush for flaunting a "prideful unilateralism" in the war on terrorism and warned the commander-in-chief that the United States "cannot direct the rest of the world to follow our orders merely because we said so."
I don't recall any time when we "ordered" the rest of the world to do something. We said "this needs to be done. Will you help us?", and when they declined, we said "Ok, we'll do it alone." If we're the only nation willing to take care of a problem, then by God we have a right to a little pride about it. It certainly does make us better than those nations that want to fiddlefart around. The national interest first, Hilldebeast.
To: BRUMama
Wow! the only thing wrong with her last sentence, "well outside the mainstream.", is that she wouldn't recognize the mainstream if it came up and bit her in that very wide part of her backside. Amen.
11
posted on
04/10/2005 3:41:12 AM PDT
by
gakrak
("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
To: BRUMama
This does not compute...
12
posted on
04/10/2005 3:41:49 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: Darkwolf377
But she is, after all, "The Bride of Satan". An excorcist will be needed..
To: BRUMama
Did Mrs. Clinton take her Bible to the podium?
To: BRUMama
If I were you Hillary, I wouldn't slam the voters you'll be needing come 2008. Which voters, you might ask? These voters, Hillary:
Conservative pro-life Christian voters made monumental contributions to GWB's 2004 vote totals. Pres Bush won with 63 Million Votes (13 million more than 2000).
The map, though impressive, conveys the misleading impression that blue state Catholics voted for Kerry (a CINO).
According to EWTN "The World Over Live" analysts, with the exception of VA, where Catholics spit 70/30 in favor of Bush, the majority of Catholic voters split 55/45 for Bush.....a whopping number of votes since Catholics number about 52 million Americans.
According to CNN exit polls, Bush voters included 38% of union members, 40% of those with union members in their households, 42% of those earning $15,000-$30,000, 44% of those who earn under $50,000 and 44% of Latinos, 45% of youth (aged 18-29), 13% of liberalseven 11% of Democrats voted for Bush.
2004 Election polls indicated 34% called themselves conservative, 21% liberal.
The National Association of Evangelicals, which represents 39 million churchgoers. There are an estimated one billion Catholics around the world, and according to the Church of England, there are 70 million Anglicans. America's census bureau said 159 million US citizens describe themselves as Christians.
If you look closely, the map appears to place the insignificant "Other Voters" in the ocean.....that's accurate, because "Other Voters--RINO Republicans" were on cruise ships.
(MAP UPDATE Bush won Ohio, Iowa and New Mexico later.)
15
posted on
04/10/2005 4:44:39 AM PDT
by
Liz
(One of it's most compelling tenets is Catholicism's acknowledgement of individual free will.)
To: Ain Soph Aur
"She lambasted Republican members of Congress as "extras in the movie 'I Robot' " who "mindlessly rubberstamp the agenda of this administration" and want to do "little more than fund the military and build some highways.""
Sadly, this comment is more effective than the beast knows. In today's society the ignorant and uninformed mind is more likely to have seen such a movie on DVD or HBO and will feel validated politically because the beast made a comparison they can understand and contemplate.
To: BRUMama
put a dirty gym sock in it...skank!
17
posted on
04/10/2005 5:12:05 AM PDT
by
Route101
To: BRUMama
..... and this is the new, improved, centrist, prayerful Hillary?
Same old Hillary, same old leftist ideolody.
Same old VRWC.
Screeching and pandering does not get a lot of votes.
18
posted on
04/10/2005 5:16:17 AM PDT
by
Cincinna
(BEWARE HILLARY and her HINO)
To: BRUMama
I am not right wing. I support the U.S. Constitution. That put me (and most conservatives) smack-dab in the center.
To: BRUMama
She lambasted Republican members of Congress as "extras in the movie 'I Robot' " who "mindlessly rubberstamp the agenda of this administration" and want to do "little more than fund the military and build some highways." That is precisely what the Federal level was meant to do... It's such a shame that what few Americans see that sentence, they won't cock their head to the side and say "What the hell are you talking about you moron?!?!" like they should.
20
posted on
04/10/2005 5:23:43 AM PDT
by
smith288
(Peace at all cost makes for tyranny free of charge...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson