Posted on 04/08/2005 3:12:48 PM PDT by LibWhacker
A recent report on US intelligence harshly critiqued counter-spy efforts.
WASHINGTON – Amid all the criticism of the US's faulty intelligence-gathering, a new concern is surfacing about America's premier national-security agencies - their vulnerability to counterespionage.
Because the US has reached such lone, superpower status, government officials say, at least 90 countries - in addition to Al Qaeda - are attempting to steal some of the nation's most sacred secrets.
It's not only foes, like members of terror groups or nations that are adversaries of the US, but friends as well. The top five countries trying to snoop on US plans and cutting-edge technology, according to an official who works closely with the FBI on this issue, are China, Russia, Israel, France, and North Korea. Others running close behind: Cuba, Pakistan, and India.
"With the end of the Soviet Union, people stopped taking counterintelligence seriously," says Patrick Lang, former head of Middle East intelligence at the Defense Intelligence Agency. "Not enough attention has been devoted to keeping people from getting into our secret store of knowledge."
The issue is getting more attention now. The Silberman-Robb commission, the latest to scrutinize the intelligence capabilities of the US, harshly criticized the US's counterintelligence efforts across the 15 agencies and recommended major changes. During the same week, the Bush administration released its National Counterintelligence Strategy of the United States. And top counterintelligence officials participated in a conference at Texas A&M University earlier in March.
A chief concern, officials say, is that Al Qaeda or other terror groups may try to infiltrate US national security agencies. Paul Redmond, a former CIA counterintelligence official who spoke at the conference last month, said it is an "actuarial certainty" that foreign spies have again infiltrated US national-security agencies.
The CIA, according to a recruiter at the conference, has already flagged about 40 applicants who they think may have tried to be double agents. This would fit Al Qaeda's pattern, according to Michael Scheuer, a former top CIA counterterrorism official. Al Qaeda operatives, he says, have already penetrated several security agencies in Middle Eastern countries.
The US has long had trouble with double agents. During the cold war, essentially every component of the US's national- security apparatus - with maybe the exception of the Coast Guard - was penetrated, experts say. Moles working for adversaries of the US stole closely guarded secrets, including details on nuclear weapons programs, cryptographic codes, and information on how the US spies on its adversaries.
Moreover, intelligence officials and experts say, this is an area where the US has never gained an advantage overseas, and it's becoming more difficult to operate in an ever-changing world.
For one thing, all 15 US intelligence agencies have ramped up their recruiting efforts - possibly opening the door to infiltrators - to support the government's policies in the war on terror. At the same time, the US has engaged in more information-sharing activities with allies - the coalition in Iraq, for example, and several other arrangements with foreign governments for strategic reasons.
The US shares critical technology and weapons programs with allies, like Israel. But in the past, and again more recently, the US has censured Israel for selling that technology to US adversaries, like China. Just last week, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld met with Israel's defense minister, Shaul Mofaz, and reportedly made it clear that Israel was to stop selling US-originated weapons systems, like the HARPY unmanned aerial vehicle, to China.
"We continue to raise these concerns with allies, friends, and partners and look for them to take a responsible approach to arms sales to China," says Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman.
But it is also difficult for Americans to become double agents and counter foreign spies because of cultural sensitivities. "We're never going to be as good at developing techniques and strategies [as] ... countries in opposition to us," says Peter Crooks, a 20-year veteran of the FBI's counterintelligence program.
He explains that countries like Cuba, former Soviet bloc countries, and several in the Middle East don't hesitate to use such tactics. But in the US, people find it distasteful, even dishonorable, to spy on neighbors or to try to turn them into informants.
Indeed, Mr. Lang tells the story of speaking on intelligence gathering at a recent conclave at Penn State. A South Korean in the audience, a member of that country's equivalent of the FBI, asked why the US is so bad at espionage.
Lang replied: "Well, we've got you here for two years, right? Wouldn't it be logical for us to put a couple of our guys next to you, recruit you, so that when you return home, you can provide us information from inside your government?"
The South Korean responded that would be perfectly appropriate: It's what other countries routinely do.
Lang says he paused a moment, smiled, then pointed out how uncomfortable the audience had become - most, he says, were squirming in their seats.
Yet experts like Lang and Crooks say that's exactly what needs to be done. The US needs to recruit members of the large immigrant communities in the US who travel back and forth to home countries and know the cultures.
The Silberman-Robb report called for more aggressive tactics, too. "Even as our adversaries - and many of our 'friends' - ramp up their intelligence activities against the United States, our counterintelligence efforts remain fractured, myopic, and marginally effective," the report states. "Our counterintelligence philosophy and practices need dramatic change, starting with centralizing counterintelligence leadership ... and taking our counterintelligence fight overseas to adversaries currently safe from scrutiny."
Wouldn't public executions of spies and moles solve this problem? When the enemy believes you will take extreme measures agains them they tend to go elsewhere.
This is ridiculous, all the counter intelligence personnel need to be either kicked in the butt or fired now! All they can offer are excuses as to why they are failures and quoting that xCIA idiot Scheuer is no vote of confidence either! If they can't do it, why are they on the payroll!
Who needs moles anymore? Just wait until the next Dem administration, and buy it.
Sure,.......
.....Well,.....THIS 'means' the end of the 'INS'.
:-)
Attention foreign countries: Recruit me with fabulous sums of money. Freepmail me with offers.
Americans condemn and deride people who uphold ethics, morals, and character and then wonder why we can't trust anyone.
One of the people I work with berated me for returning a wallet with $1400 in cash to the rightful owner. I mean he made an ASS out of me in front of my coworkers for being a Christian, a conservative, and for being a fool with morals. Less than a month after that he dropped a roll of bills with $225 in it.
In front of him and everyone in a meeting I asked him about the issue hypothetically and he told me I should keep the money. I asked him again if he was serious that I should use his ethics in this particular case instead of my ethics - which would mean the money would go back to the proper owner. He told me, bitterly, that I had my head up my a$$ if I didn't keep the money a "retarded idiot" lost.
I then said I'd be keeping the money since he insisted.
Then I told him that this was ethical as it was HIS money and I'd be considering it a gift since I had, after all, attempted to give it back.
He was passed over for a promotion that I got and he went off about it. The VP who made the decision told him the matter came down to one issue: Trust.
And the company can't trust my coworker.
It is no surprise to me that Mormons tend to dominate US security groups since they can be trusted above the general populace.
The article read, "But in the US, people find it distasteful, even dishonorable, to spy on neighbors or to try to turn them into informants."
We as a people need to get over our sense of fair play in the big show of foreign affairs. When it comes to intelligence gathering, nice guys finish dead.
ROTFLOL
And the greedy fools keep hiring H1-Bs ...
I'm not LDS, by the way. Just stating a statistical truism.
"It is no surprise to me that Mormons tend to dominate US security groups since they can be trusted above the general populace."
Laugh all you want. Visit Fort Meade sometime and you'll stop laughing. I am NOT a Mormon and my comment is not a compliment to Mormons - it is a criticism of the rest of us.
Gosh, next thing you know some trusted former executive with the highest security clearances will be stealing sensitive handwritten notes from the national archives ostensibly to thwart investigations into the worst terrorist attack on US soil to date, and to absolve said person's cohorts from responsibility or complicity. Sounds to fanciful too contemplate.
to <> too
If you ask me, Peter, he made an ass of himself. I love the karmic (can a conservative use that word, lol?) turnabout in your story. And congrats on the promotion!
I think we already have a lot of moles sitting in congress: Most rats, and some republicans. It's insane.
America's "premier" "intelligence" agencies don't know squat about squat, and are directed by politicians whose only concerns are political correctness and protecting illegal aliens' job prospects.
" Who would spy on Albania for nuclear technology ?"
I see the Albanian intelligence ruse has worked. They are so crafty no one would suspect that it was THEY who actually controlled the Soviet Union and are responsible for the spread of Communism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.