Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/06/2005 12:28:18 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pikamax
Good news continues in 2005. Only Connecticut is infected by the Boston Disease. shudder>

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
2 posted on 04/06/2005 12:31:15 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Time to pack up the car and move to Kansas.


3 posted on 04/06/2005 12:36:59 AM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
71% to 29% - That seems to be about the norm in states that have voted on the issue. Maybe the homosexual activists will get the message soon, that even most libs do not accept their agenda.
4 posted on 04/06/2005 12:38:29 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Aha - "gay" marriage going down in flames. You gotta love it.

I like it better when it's 80%-20%, but this is good enough.

Let DirtyHarryY2K and me know if you want on/off this pinglist.

Anyone know if the language also prohibits civil unions?


6 posted on 04/06/2005 12:48:38 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

The primary paper of central Kansas, The Wichita Eagle, reliably complained about the amendment proposal and insisted several times in its editorial and stories that we vote "no".


9 posted on 04/06/2005 1:50:37 AM PDT by Crazieman (Islam. Religion of peace, and they'll kill you to prove it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
What is this PISH POSH about the people of a state deciding the laws??

What need have we of referendum? What need have we of legislatures and legislators? Indeed, what need have we of an Executive branch??

I have surmised that the only usefulness of the citizenry and their elected representatives is limited to their work in enforcing the desires and rulings of the real arbiters of all societal laws:


10 posted on 04/06/2005 2:17:11 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Kansas Voters Approve Ban on Gay Unions (71-29%)

...But...but...are they sure?!?

; p

11 posted on 04/06/2005 2:32:09 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

K.C. don't wanna see those two rumpriders skippin down the the street........


13 posted on 04/06/2005 3:07:53 AM PDT by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

"Homo, we're not in Kansas anymore."


14 posted on 04/06/2005 4:02:47 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Way to go Kansas!


16 posted on 04/06/2005 4:14:00 AM PDT by kassie ("It's the soldier who allows freedom of speech, not the reporter..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Some time around World War Twice my father and his father
moved to Colorado from Kansas-- I f Colorado's Congress
doesn't quit pandering to the queers I may just move back
to Kansas.Do like my homoe State- but I hate their government.


17 posted on 04/06/2005 4:14:33 AM PDT by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

71% to 29%? I'm surprised it was that close.


19 posted on 04/06/2005 4:58:17 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

How long before some liberal judge overturns it?


20 posted on 04/06/2005 4:59:17 AM PDT by airborne (Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Matt Foreman, (practicing homosexual)... said the vote was not surprising, given results in other states.

"What is appalling is the continued silence and inaction of people of faith and people of goodwill to speak out, to stand up to this wave of attacks against gay people," he said.

Matt, Matt, Matt. People of faith and of goodwill are the ones who voted 71% for banning sexually perverse unions. Wake up and smell the coffee. Homosexual behavior hurts everyone around it and can no more be tolerated than child abuse (to which it is inextricably linked) or murder

21 posted on 04/06/2005 5:53:00 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Sanity in the heartland BUMP


23 posted on 04/06/2005 7:04:38 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

I got an invitation to a "wedding". It was a former coworker's son and son's "life partner" of three months. I declined the invite but sent a gift. An extension cord with two male ends.


28 posted on 04/06/2005 8:37:35 AM PDT by whereasandsoforth (Stamp out liberals with the big boot of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

"Among the opponents was Democratic Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, who said she supported the existing state law and viewed it as sufficient."

Could a Kansan please explain to me how Kansas came to have a Dem Governor? I mean, Wisconsin has one too, but he bought his governorship.


32 posted on 04/06/2005 10:51:02 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

---"Among the opponents was Democratic Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, who said she supported the existing state law and viewed it as sufficient." ---

This translates into: 'I know full-well that the state law could very well be overturned by state courts, and indeed this is what I hoped for.'

---"I don't think we need a constitutional amendment, and particularly a constitutional amendment that goes far beyond the bounds of that law," she said."---

This translates into; 'At a very minimum I had hoped that the state courts would impose civil unions, and that the people would accept this euphemistic substitute for gay marriage, but now that can't happen.'

I wonder, if the gov is so upset that the Amendment goes further than the state law, then has she taken this position to its logical conclusion and called for civil unions? Isn't she up for relection next year? Then I doubt that she has.


38 posted on 04/06/2005 10:02:41 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson