Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kansas Voters Approve Ban on Gay Unions (71-29%)
AP ^ | 04/06/05 | JOHN HANNA

Posted on 04/06/2005 12:28:17 AM PDT by Pikamax

Kansas Voters Approve Ban on Gay Unions

2 hours, 20 minutes ago U.S. National - AP

By JOHN HANNA, Associated Press Writer

TOPEKA, Kan. - Voters in Kansas overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment Tuesday banning same-sex couples from marrying or entering into civil unions.

With 97 percent of the vote reported, 395,468, or 71 percent, voted "yes," and 163,766, or 29 percent, voted "no."

Gay marriage is already banned under Kansas law, and the law is not being challenged. But supporters of the ballot measure said the ban must be in the Kansas Constitution to insulate it from legal challenge.

Most voters appeared to brush aside critics' arguments that the amendment could have unexpected consequences, such as preventing companies from offering health benefits to employees' partners, gay or heterosexual.

"The way marriage is in the Bible, God says it's between man and woman," said Sharon Kent, 58, of the Kansas City suburb of Mission. "I don't have a problem with gays being together, living together, but I have a problem with them getting married."

Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, said the vote was not surprising, given results in other states.

"What is appalling is the continued silence and inaction of people of faith and people of goodwill to speak out, to stand up to this wave of attacks against gay people," he said.

The Rev. Terry Fox, senior pastor at Wichita's Immanuel Baptist Church and a leader of the campaign for the proposal, said he expects opponents to challenge the amendment in court, though he is confident it will stand up.

"We always felt like if Kansans were given an opportunity to vote, they would vote strongly to protect marriage and defend marriage in the way it has traditionally been defined," Fox said. "The real winner here was marriage itself."

Republican state Attorney General Phill Kline had said the amendment was "an unfortunate, necessary reaction to activist courts."

Among the opponents was Democratic Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, who said she supported the existing state law and viewed it as sufficient.

"I don't think we need a constitutional amendment, and particularly a constitutional amendment that goes far beyond the bounds of that law," she said.

Kansas became the 18th state with such a prohibition in its constitution. Alabama, South Dakota and Tennessee plan elections next year on constitutional bans, and proposals are pending in 13 other states, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Meanwhile, Connecticut's Senate was prepared to vote Wednesday on a bill that would allow same-sex couples to enter into civil unions. The bill has broad support in both Democratic-controlled chambers of the Legislature.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: familyvaluesbump; flyovercountry; marriage; redstateamerica; traditionalmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 04/06/2005 12:28:18 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Good news continues in 2005. Only Connecticut is infected by the Boston Disease. shudder>

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
2 posted on 04/06/2005 12:31:15 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Time to pack up the car and move to Kansas.


3 posted on 04/06/2005 12:36:59 AM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
71% to 29% - That seems to be about the norm in states that have voted on the issue. Maybe the homosexual activists will get the message soon, that even most libs do not accept their agenda.
4 posted on 04/06/2005 12:38:29 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

And some Federal Judge is sitting out their saying 'how dare they vote like this, then they will change the outcome in a judges chamber.


5 posted on 04/06/2005 12:38:39 AM PDT by gulfcoast6 (. or, ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Aha - "gay" marriage going down in flames. You gotta love it.

I like it better when it's 80%-20%, but this is good enough.

Let DirtyHarryY2K and me know if you want on/off this pinglist.

Anyone know if the language also prohibits civil unions?


6 posted on 04/06/2005 12:48:38 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Yep. Even in a liberal, pro-Kerry state like Oregon, it still passed with nearly 60% in favor. The homosexual agenda's bid to redefine marriage in this country doesn't have widespread popular support. The only way gay activists succeed is by having unelected judges ram it down our throats.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
7 posted on 04/06/2005 12:53:03 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Yet another reason why the liberal/leftists are anxious to turn our country into a judicial fiefdom.


8 posted on 04/06/2005 12:56:36 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

The primary paper of central Kansas, The Wichita Eagle, reliably complained about the amendment proposal and insisted several times in its editorial and stories that we vote "no".


9 posted on 04/06/2005 1:50:37 AM PDT by Crazieman (Islam. Religion of peace, and they'll kill you to prove it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
What is this PISH POSH about the people of a state deciding the laws??

What need have we of referendum? What need have we of legislatures and legislators? Indeed, what need have we of an Executive branch??

I have surmised that the only usefulness of the citizenry and their elected representatives is limited to their work in enforcing the desires and rulings of the real arbiters of all societal laws:


10 posted on 04/06/2005 2:17:11 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Kansas Voters Approve Ban on Gay Unions (71-29%)

...But...but...are they sure?!?

; p

11 posted on 04/06/2005 2:32:09 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
They're a bunch of bigoted homophobes. I expect any day, an ACLU lawsuit in Federal Court.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
12 posted on 04/06/2005 2:36:18 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

K.C. don't wanna see those two rumpriders skippin down the the street........


13 posted on 04/06/2005 3:07:53 AM PDT by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

"Homo, we're not in Kansas anymore."


14 posted on 04/06/2005 4:02:47 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
...But...but...are they sure?!?

BBV strikes again! Contact Bev Harri$!!

15 posted on 04/06/2005 4:11:31 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women (HJ Simpson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Way to go Kansas!


16 posted on 04/06/2005 4:14:00 AM PDT by kassie ("It's the soldier who allows freedom of speech, not the reporter..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Some time around World War Twice my father and his father
moved to Colorado from Kansas-- I f Colorado's Congress
doesn't quit pandering to the queers I may just move back
to Kansas.Do like my homoe State- but I hate their government.


17 posted on 04/06/2005 4:14:33 AM PDT by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I hope they do, and I hope they hand pick a judge who grants the motion...that, more than anything else, will show the problem of judicial activism..


18 posted on 04/06/2005 4:24:37 AM PDT by ken5050 (The Dem party is as dead as the NHL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

71% to 29%? I'm surprised it was that close.


19 posted on 04/06/2005 4:58:17 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

How long before some liberal judge overturns it?


20 posted on 04/06/2005 4:59:17 AM PDT by airborne (Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson