Skip to comments.
Stem-cell research is pro-life
Boston Herald ^
| Monday, April 4, 2005
| John Kerry
Posted on 04/04/2005 5:19:23 PM PDT by Radix
For everyone, the issue of stem-cell research is deeply personal and fundamentally moral. We each dread getting a call from a doctor with the results of a diagnosis that makes our heart sink, or the day we say goodbye to a loved one.
I'll never forget a woman I met last fall at a town hall meeting on stem-cell research. She stood up, her frail body shaking, and pleaded for her government to embrace stem-cell research. It was the moral clarity of her message that will stay with me forever.
``It's too late for me,'' she said, ``but we need to do this for those who still have hope.''
It's not too late for 13-year- old Garrett Burgess of Chelmsford, paralyzed at the age of 5, who traveled to all 50 states with his father to make the case for stem-cell research his doctors believe hold the promise that he can one day walk again.
In Massachusetts, we need to think of this moral challenge as Gov. Mitt Romney [related, bio] decides whether to sign or veto landmark legislation to allow research that holds out hope for millions. It's a question of our values as a state and a people, and these questions should never be answered lightly - but they must be answered.
More than 100 million Americans suffer from illnesses that one day might be wiped away with stem-cell therapy. Stem cells could replace damaged heart cells or cells destroyed by cancer, offering a new lease on life to those with a diagnosis that once came with a death sentence. Stem cells have the power to slow the loss of a grandmother's memory, calm the hand of an uncle with Parkinson's, save a child from a lifetime of daily insulin shots or permanently lift a best friend from a wheelchair.
Some of the most pioneering cures and treatments are now right at our fingertips, but because of politics they could remain beyond reach.
Nationally, America has been losing its lead in science. Our share of industrial patents is down, our share of Nobel prizes is down, our published research is down and the number of doctorates in the sciences is down.
This is not the way we do things in Massachusetts. We're a state of discovery - a place where innovators and optimists are free to dream and explore. Where government encourages creativity and entrepreneurship instead of stifling it. Where we're always pushing the boundaries of knowledge.
This hasn't just been a story of scientific imagination, but of political imagination - from leaders at every step who recognized the hope and possibilities of science to save lives.
And that's why this groundbreaking legislation on stem-cell research must become law. Every day that we wait, more than 3,000 Americans die from diseases that may someday be treatable because of stem-cell research.
We must make funding for this research a priority. Above all, we must look to the future not with fear, but with the hope and the faith that advances in science will advance our highest ideals.
Progress has always brought with it the worry that we have gone too far. Some questioned the morality of heart transplants. We heard the same kind of arguments against biotech research that now saves stroke victims and leukemia patients.
The question is no different on stem-cell research. People of good will and good sense can resolve the ethical issues without stopping lifesaving research. There's already bipartisan support in the U.S. Senate to ban human cloning and allow therapeutic cloning to advance. This issue transcends political labels. That's why Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Nancy Reagan refuse to tie the hands of doctors and oppose restrictions on lifesaving research.
It should be no different in our state. Massachusetts has long led the country in great discoveries, always upholding the highest standards, ensuring our breakthroughs and our beliefs go hand-in-hand. And when it comes to stem-cell research, policymakers have worked to find common ground and draw strict and appropriate ethical guidelines, and they've succeeded.
I hope that Romney signs this bill and makes it clear that in Massachusetts, we say yes to knowledge, yes to discovery and yes to leading a new era of hope for all.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cary; kerrylies; propaganda; stemcells
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
To: Radix
When is he going to sign Form 180? Didn't he promise he was going to do that?
41
posted on
04/04/2005 7:44:03 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Radix
They just don't get it. You don't kill unborn children to use to keep your loved one alive - sorry!
No wonder the democrats are in such trouble with moral values - they don't even know what moral values are.
42
posted on
04/04/2005 8:05:24 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Agitate; Alouette; Annie03; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; Balto_Boy; ...
As the good Doctor McCoy once said, "I'd pay real money if he'd shut up." ProLife Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
43
posted on
04/04/2005 9:29:33 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(Karol Wojtyla, my brother, thank you for being you. Rest in Joy.)
To: Radix
``It's too late for me,'' she said, ``but we need to do this for those who still have hope.''It's not too late for 13-year- old Garrett Burgess of Chelmsford, paralyzed at the age of 5, who traveled to all 50 states with his father to make the case for stem-cell research his doctors believe hold the promise that he can one day walk again.
How late is it for the embroyo [baby] that is killed to provide the stem cells, senator? What's the term for those that eat their young?
44
posted on
04/04/2005 9:33:51 PM PDT
by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Click on my name to see what readers have said about my Christian novels!)
To: Coleus
45
posted on
04/04/2005 9:43:37 PM PDT
by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Click on my name to see what readers have said about my Christian novels!)
To: Radix
I'll never forget a woman I met last fall at a town hall meeting...."Mr., I met a man once, who...."
"I guess none of our stories is very funny...."
46
posted on
04/04/2005 9:51:51 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Radix
Let's keep it straight: there is unethical research and ethical research.
Any research that purposefully and intentionally by design kills a human being or any of our children, is unethical.
Non-embryonic stem cells are ethical. There are 2 women in Texas who went to Portugal to receive therapy with their own stem cells. My granddaughter and thousands of patients have received umbilical stem cell bone marrow transplants. Researchers in Australia reported that they are able to get multiple lines of easily grown, self-reproducing stem cells from the sensory cells in the nasal mucosa.
47
posted on
04/04/2005 10:08:02 PM PDT
by
hocndoc
(Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
To: Radix
Yes to stem cell research, all kinds, yes.
We need to cure people and keep them working, to pay taxes.
When they can't pay taxes anymore, pull their feeding tubes.
48
posted on
04/04/2005 10:24:04 PM PDT
by
pyoursu
To: Mr. Silverback
49
posted on
04/04/2005 10:25:02 PM PDT
by
hocndoc
(Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
To: hocndoc
50
posted on
04/04/2005 10:29:44 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(Karol Wojtyla, my brother, thank you for being you. Rest in Joy.)
To: Radix
Embryonic stem-cell research is to pro-life,
as homosexuality is to celibacy.
Please crawl back under your sewer cover Flipper John.
51
posted on
04/05/2005 1:53:42 AM PDT
by
OneLoyalAmerican
(The only 180 Flipper John hasn't done is the SF-180.)
To: Mr. Silverback
52
posted on
04/05/2005 2:57:09 AM PDT
by
lainde
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
53
posted on
04/05/2005 3:04:40 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: B Knotts; cyborg; fortunecookie
What we oppose is embroynic stem cell research, also known as clone & kill. It is immoral to create a human life in order to kill it for any reason.Brilliant!
54
posted on
04/05/2005 3:08:49 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(I thank God Almighty for a most remarkable blessing: John Paul the Great.)
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
55
posted on
04/05/2005 4:39:15 AM PDT
by
bitt
(Go sell crazy somewhere else. We're all stocked up here.)
To: netmilsmom
Really. His wife could fund some serious research. But of course the tax payers should pay for it instead.
Oh and by the way, Kerry, I agree with you - stem cell research IS moral...when done with adult cells. It's the embryonic - and so far completely unsuccessful - kind that's wholly immoral.
56
posted on
04/05/2005 9:14:53 AM PDT
by
agrace
([ It is He] that brings the princes to nothing; He makes the judges of the earth as vanity. Is 40:23)
To: Wonder Warthog
Easily-----he's a DEMOCRAT... Well, yeah, there's that....:)
57
posted on
04/05/2005 2:13:38 PM PDT
by
infidel29
("It is only the warlike power of a civilized people that can give peace to the world."- T. Roosevelt)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson