Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SANDY BERGER: I LIED, I DELIBERATELY DESTROYED DOCUMENTS ON TERRORISM POLICY
National Review ^ | April 1, 2005 | Jim Geraghty

Posted on 04/02/2005 6:17:05 AM PST by conservativecorner

The Powerliners are not happy with the Sandy Berger plea deal. But I'm a little surprised that Burglar - I mean, Berger - admitted so much. From today's Post:

Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, a former White House national security adviser, plans to plead guilty to a misdemeanor, and will acknowledge intentionally removing and destroying copies of a classified document about the Clinton administration's record on terrorism. ...

The deal's terms make clear that Berger spoke falsely last summer in public claims that in 2003 he twice inadvertently walked off with copies of a classified document during visits to the National Archives, then later lost them.

He described the episode last summer as "an honest mistake." Yesterday, a Berger associate who declined to be identified by name but was speaking with Berger's permission said: "He recognizes what he did was wrong. . . . It was not inadvertent."

That all sounds pretty damning. But then you read the actual consequences:

Under terms negotiated by Berger's attorneys and the Justice Department, he has agreed to pay a $10,000 fine and accept a three-year suspension of his national security clearance. These terms must be accepted by a judge before they are final, but Berger's associates said yesterday he believes that closure is near on what has been an embarrassing episode during which he repeatedly misled people about what happened during two visits to the National Archives in September and October 2003. What? Just what do you have to do to get your clearance pulled permanently? Start the clock, he can go back and start deleting memos that make him and his colleagues look bad starting in 2008 or so!

The details of this story are even more damning:

Rather than misplacing or unintentionally throwing away three of the five copies he took from the archives, as the former national security adviser earlier maintained, he shredded them with a pair of scissors late one evening at the downtown offices of his international consulting business. The document, written by former National Security Council terrorism expert Richard A. Clarke, was an "after-action review" prepared in early 2000 detailing the administration's actions to thwart terrorist attacks during the millennium celebration. It contained considerable discussion about the administration's awareness of the rising threat of attacks on U.S. soil.

Although one element of this story apparently is a bit of an urban legend:

On Sept. 2, 2003, the associate said, Berger put a copy of the Clarke report in his suit jacket. He did not put it in his socks or underwear, as was alleged by some Republicans last summer. Now... what about this deafening silence that we have heard on this from Berger's associates, since this story first surfaced? Will we be seeing any criticism of him from former President Clinton, Madeline Albright, Hillary, John Kerry, or any other prominent Democrat? Is the perception that this is no big deal, standard operating procedure for that White House, and is something to be swept under the rug?

Do any Democrats want to confront the unpleasant truths of how the Clinton White House handled terrorism?

Because there were some facts out there that were so damning, Sandy Berger was willing to break the law to make sure the public never saw them.

[Posted 04/01 04:38 AM]


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: berger; coverup; sandyberger; whitewash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-146 next last
To: Mad Mammoth
LMAO

I didn't even notice.

But you're right, wanked is most appropriate slip for a Clintonista remark. Those criminals are still wanking us

61 posted on 04/02/2005 7:22:29 AM PST by Popman (The American Left: Goose Stepping into the Future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

If Berger were a Republican, we would be treated to the following media circus over the next two weeks:

- Daily above-the-fold newspaper articles containing details of the theft of the documents.

- Explanations of government document security classifications and why the theft of top secret documents poses such a grave threat to our country.

- Interviews with Republican officials asking them if they would continue to support Mr. Berger and the administration.

- An increasing volume of stories and articles pointing out that "this goes all the way to the top" and "what does the President know?"

- How the theft and destruction of these documents prevented the 911 Commission from completing a thorough review of the events leading to Sep. 11, 2001.

- Expressions of outrage at the minimal sentence given to Mr. Berger with suggestions of cover-up.

- Interviews with Democrats calling for the resignation of the President.


62 posted on 04/02/2005 7:24:08 AM PST by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty

Thanks for the insights, will keep my watch on those you suggested.


63 posted on 04/02/2005 7:24:18 AM PST by WmShirerAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
I sincerely hope that the justice department tapped Berger's phone before this story went public and have enough to make sure that he does cooperate or the deal is off and Sandy does real hard time.

A guy here in Virginia got at least a year in prison and a $100,000 fine (could have been more just can't remember the details)for stealing Civil War era documents from the National Archives after pleading guilty. With the national security issues involved Berger should be due the same or worse...
64 posted on 04/02/2005 7:26:41 AM PST by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner; PhilDragoo; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; Alamo-Girl; Ragtime Cowgirl


.

BILL CLINTON refused 3 No-Strings Offers from the Sudan during the 1990's to give us our proven No. 1 Terrorist Enemy OSAMA bin LADEN on a Silver Platter.

BILL CLINTON's White House Pointman on these 3 Offers=

SANDY BERGER

Former Chief Washington D.C. Lobbyist for Communist China =

SANDY BERGER

Personally guaranteed on NBC's 'Meet the Press' one Sunday morning that there was "No Way" the Communist Chinese could get a hold of our precious Missile & Space Satellite Technology when they launch Amerian Space Satellites from Communist China, which (Of Course) they promptly did =

SANDY BERGER

The Enemy is now Within...
and always has been =

SANDY BERGER

...while BILL CLINTON just laughs away at US in the Media.

.


65 posted on 04/02/2005 7:27:46 AM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

Thanks for the ping!


66 posted on 04/02/2005 7:29:37 AM PST by Alamo-Girl (Please donate monthly to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks

Remember what the demorats did to Senator Packwood??? What law did HE break?


67 posted on 04/02/2005 7:29:52 AM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
Covering for himself, Clinton or both?

Will the 9/11 Commission Members (i.e., Gorelick) get on the air and berate him, like they did Rice?

Of course not.
68 posted on 04/02/2005 7:30:08 AM PST by AlGone2001 (You will never know that Jesus is all you need, until Jesus is all you've got-Mother Theresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pylot
Any mere citizen would be thrown in jail for life after they were prosecuted under the Patriot Act.

Patriot Act has some strong reporting requirements. Cite me even one abuse of the Act.

69 posted on 04/02/2005 7:34:42 AM PST by Doctor Raoul (Support Our Troops, Spit On A Reporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

.

3 OSAMA Offers refused by CLINTON and BERGER =

World Trade Center Tower 2 comes crashing down on my fellow Veteran of the 1965 Battle of the IA DRANG Valley:

Lifetime Lifesaving Hero RICK RESCORLA

http://www.RickRescorla.com

.


70 posted on 04/02/2005 7:40:47 AM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci

"Remember what the demorats did to Senator Packwood???"

As I remember, they even subpoened his diary. (odd that the Democrats are the first ones to scream about "right to privacy")


71 posted on 04/02/2005 7:41:28 AM PST by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

Indeed. Thanks for the ping!


72 posted on 04/02/2005 7:44:10 AM PST by Alamo-Girl (Please donate monthly to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

73 posted on 04/02/2005 7:45:44 AM PST by wolficatZ ( + ><))))*> + NIGHT OF THE LEPUS II- Revenge of the Easter Bunnies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Martha got prison time for lining her pockets with a little extra cash.

Sandy destroyed National Security Documents and gets his hands spanked.

Our Justice System needs a overhaul.


74 posted on 04/02/2005 7:48:51 AM PST by Faith-Hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer

If Berger was a Republican, doubt if the punishment would have been much worse. But we'd hear about it endlessly in the MSM as "Berglargate".


75 posted on 04/02/2005 7:49:32 AM PST by CedarDave ("...extraordinarily serene" - words that describe the Pope but not Terri Schiavo in their last hours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

He looks a 'rat, smells like a 'rat and acts like a 'rat.


76 posted on 04/02/2005 7:51:54 AM PST by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmedNReady

He also has Demonic immunity.


77 posted on 04/02/2005 7:53:18 AM PST by hope ( silent no more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
I love the way the OMwhores have swept this gem under the rug!...sarcasm/off
78 posted on 04/02/2005 7:57:37 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
From THE DAY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA DIED (tune: American Pie) -- on YOU'VE BEEN FREEPED, Vol. 1

We were singing, bye, bye to Old Media, bye
It was quite a run but you are done and now it won't fly
New Media's here, so be a big girl, don't cry
We were laughing as Old Media died...laughing as Old Media died
Would they do what's right? They're saying, "NO, never"...they thought they were just so very clever
They thought they'd get away with it
Docs were found down in Sandy Berger's pants...and Dan Rather thought he'd take a chance
With those forgeries now George Bush he would get
Dan used them and he was elated...but Bush is misunderestimated
Thanks to a group of sleepers...pajama-wearing FReepers
So Dan Rather's plan would fail...Ken's frequency was now in a jail
A happy ending to this tale
Old Media would die

79 posted on 04/02/2005 8:00:41 AM PST by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Because there were some facts out there that were so damning, Sandy Berger was willing to break the law to make sure the public never saw them.
This makes no sense at all as the article states twice that everything taken was a copy.
...three of the five copies he took from the archives...
...Berger put a copy of the Clarke report ...
(just which Clark report was it and where can the public view it at?)
If there were "damning facts" contained in these "copies" then they were/are still available for viewing by the public and should've been aired during The 9/11 Commission's precedings.
Why steal only copies of documents when stealing the original and all of the copies of those documents would be required to keep them from the public's view.
Berger had to know that. This just doesn't add up.
80 posted on 04/02/2005 8:02:08 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson