Posted on 04/02/2005 6:17:05 AM PST by conservativecorner
Because there were some facts out there that were so damning, Sandy Berger was willing to break the law to make sure the public never saw them.
This makes no sense at all as the article states twice that everything taken was a copy.
...three of the five copies he took from the archives...
...Berger put a copy of the Clarke report ... (just which Clark report was it and where can the public view it at?)
If there were "damning facts" contained in these "copies" then they were/are still available for viewing by the public and should've been aired during The 9/11 Commission's precedings.
Why steal only copies of documents when stealing the original and all of the copies of those documents would be required to keep them from the public's view.
Berger had to know that. This just doesn't add up.
MARGIN NOTES!
Destroying documents on Terrorism?!?!?!? AND- the Democrats have placed us and all of our children in harm's way for greed and power.
You can bet a Republican would never be allowed access to sensitive papers again and would be shamed and driven out of ever holding any government position again.
Well, it's true. That Burglar got away with a fine and 3 year suspension is a sure sign that it is business as usual in DC. They are all on the same team, sorta like professional wrestling. They just put on a show to make it seem like they are on different sides.
And she didn't even lie under oath.
Bookmarking
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.