Neo-Nazis Kill Terri Schiavo

Movie Guide ^ | 3-30-2005 | William Federer (MovieGuide)

[Thanatos]

Neo-Nazis Kill Terri Schiavo
Mar 30th, 2005

by William Federer

Even before the rise of Adolph Hitler's Third Reich, the way for the gruesome Nazi holocaust of human extermination and cruel butchery was being prepared in the 1930 German Weimar Republic through the medical establishment and philosophical elite's adoption of the "quality of life" concept in place of the "sanctity of life."

The Nuremberg trials, exposing the horrible Nazi war crimes, revealed that Germany's trend toward atrocity began with their progressive embrace of the Hegelian doctrine of "rational utility," where an individual's worth is in relation to their contribution to the state, rather than determined in light of traditional moral, ethical and religious values.

This gradual transformation of national public opinion, promulgated through media and education, was described in an article written by the British commentator Malcolm Muggeridge, entitled "The Humane Holocaust," and in an article written by former United States Surgeon General, C. Everett Koop, M.D., entitled "The Slide to Auschwitz," both published in The Human Life Review, 1977 and 1980 respectively.

Malcolm Muggeridge stated:

"Near at hand, we have been accorded, for those that have eyes to see, an object lesson in what the quest for 'quality of life' without reference to 'sanctity of life' can involve.... the great Nazi holocaust, whose TV presentation has lately been harrowing viewers throughout the Western world.

“In this televised version, an essential consideration has been left out - namely, that the origins of the holocaust lay, not in Nazi terrorism and anti-Semitism, but in pre-Nazi Weimar Germany's acceptance of euthanasia and mercy-killing as humane and estimable....

“It took no more than three decades to transform a war crime into an act of compassion, thereby enabling the victors in the war against Nazi-ism to adopt the very practices for which the Nazis had been solemnly condemned at Nuremberg."1

The transformation followed thus: the concept that the elderly and terminally ill should have the right to die was promoted in books, newspapers, literature and even entertainment films, the most popular of which were entitled Ich klage an (I accuse) and Mentally Ill.

One euthanasia movie, based on a novel by a National Socialist doctor, actually won a prize at the world-famous Venice Film Festival!

Extreme hardship cases were cited which increasingly convinced the public to morally approve of euthanasia.

The medical profession gradually grew accustomed to administering death to patients who, for whatever reasons, felt their low "quality of life" rendered their lives not worth living, or as it was put, liebensunwerten Lebens, (life unworthy of life).2

In an Associated Press release, published in the New York Times, October 10, 1933, entitled "Nazi Plan to Kill Incurables to End Pain; German Religious Groups Oppose Move," it was stated:

"The Ministry of Justice, in a detailed memorandum explaining the Nazi aims regarding the German penal code, today announced its intentions to authorize physicians to end the sufferings of the incurable patient.

“The memorandum...proposed that it shall be possible for physicians to end the tortures of incurable patients, upon request, in the interest of true humanity.

“This proposed legal recognition of euthanasia - the act of providing a painless and peaceful death - raised a number of fundamental problems of a religious, scientific, and legal nature.

“The Catholic newspaper Germania hastened to observe: 'The Catholic faith binds the conscience of its followers not to accept this method'...

“In Lutheran circles, too, life is regarded as something that God alone can take....

“Euthanasia... has become a widely discussed word in the Reich....

“No life still valuable to the State will be wantonly destroyed."3

Nationalized health care and government involvement in medical care promised to improve the public's "quality of life."4

Unfortunately, the cost of maintaining government medical care was a contributing factor to the growth of the national debt, which reached astronomical proportions.

Double and triple digit inflation crippled the economy, resulting in the public demanding that government cut expenses.5

This precipitated the 1939 order to cut federal expenses.

The national socialist government decided do remove "useless" expenses from the budget, which included the support and medical costs required to maintain the lives of the retarded, insane, senile, epileptic, psychiatric patients, handicapped, deaf, blind, the non-rehabilitable ill, and those who had been diseased or chronically ill for five years or more.

It was labeled an "act of mercy" to "liberate them through death," as they were viewed as having an extremely low "quality of life," as well as being a tax burden on the public.

The public psyche was conditioned for this, as even school math problems compared distorted medical costs incurred by the taxpayer of caring for and rehabilitating the chronically sick, with the cost of loans to newly married couples for new housing units.6

The next whose lives were terminated by the state were the elderly in institutions who had no relatives and no financial resources.

These lonely, forsaken individuals were needed by no one and would be missed by no one.

Their "quality of life" was considered low by everyone's standards, and they were a tremendous tax burden on the economically distressed state.7

The next to be eliminated were the parasites on the state: the street people, bums, beggars, hopelessly poor, gypsies, prisoners, inmates and convicts.

These were socially disturbing individuals incapable of providing for themselves, whose "quality of life" was considered by the public as irreversibly below standard, in addition to the fact that they were a nuisance to society and a seed-bed for crime.8

The liquidation grew to include those who had been unable to work, the socially unproductive, and those living on welfare or government pensions.

They drew financial support from the state, but contributed nothing financially back.

They were looked upon as "useless eaters," leeches, stealing from those who worked hard to pay the taxes to support them.

Their unproductive lives were a burden on the "quality of life" of those who had to pay the taxes.9

The next to be eradicated were the ideologically unwanted, the political enemies of the state, religious extremists, and those "disloyal" individuals considered to be holding the government back from producing a society which would function well and provide everyone a better "quality of life."

The moving biography of the imprisoned Dietrich Bonhoffer chronicled the injustices.

These individuals also were a source of "human experimental material," allowing military medical research to be carried on with human tissue, thus providing valuable information which promised to improve the nation's health .10

Finally, justifying their actions on the purported theory of evolution, the Nazi's considered the German, or "Aryan," race as "ubermenschen," supermen, being more advanced in the supposed progress of human evolution.

This resulted in the twisted conclusion that all other races, and in particular the Jewish race, were less evolved, and needed to be eliminated from the so-called "human gene pool," ensuring that future generations of humans would have a higher "quality of life."11

C. Everett Koop, M.D., stated:

"The first step is followed by the second step. You can say that if the first step is moral then whatever follows must be moral.

“The important thing, however, is this: whether you diagnose the first step as being one worth taking or being one that is precarious rests entirely on what the second step is likely to be...

“I am concerned about this because when the first 273,000 German aged, infirm, and retarded were killed in gas chambers there was no outcry from that medical profession either, and it was not far from there to Auschwitz."12

Can this holocaust happen in America?

Indeed, it has already begun. The idea of killing a person and calling it "death with dignity" is an oxymoron. The "mercy-killing" movement puts us on the same path as pre-Nazi Germany.

The "quality of life" concept, which eventually results in the Hegelian utilitarian attitude of a person's worth being based on their contribution toward perpetuating big government, is in stark contrast to America's founding principles.

This philosophy which lowers the value of human life, shocked attendees at the Governor's Commission on Disability, in Concord, New Hampshire, October 5, 2001, as they heard the absurd comments of Princeton University professor Peter Singer.

The Associated Press reported Singer's comments:

"I do think that it is sometimes appropriate to kill a human infant," he said, adding that he does not believe a newborn has a right to life until it reaches some minimum level of consciousness.

"For me, the relevant question is, what makes it so seriously wrong to take a life?" Singer asked.

"Those of you who are not vegetarians are responsible for taking a life every time you eat. Species is no more relevant than race in making these judgments."13

Singer's views, if left unchecked, could easily lead to a repeat of the atrocities of Nazi Germany, if not something worse.

Add to that unbridled advances in the technology of cloning, DNA test which reveal physical defects, human embryos killed for the purpose of gathering stem cells to treat Diseases...and a haunting future unfolds before us.

President Theodore Roosevelt's warning in 1909 seems appropriate:

"Progress has brought us both unbounded opportunities and unbridled difficulties. Thus, the measure of our civilization will not be that we have done much, but what we have done with that much.

“I believe that the next half century will determine if we will advance the cause of Christian civilization or revert to the horrors of brutal paganism.

“The thought of modern industry in the hands of Christian charity is a dream worth dreaming.

“The thought of industry in the hands of paganism is a nightmare beyond imagining. The choice between the two is upon us."14

In his State of the Union address in 1905, President Theodore Roosevelt stated:

"There are those who believe that a new modernity demands a new morality.

“What they fail to consider is the harsh reality that there is no such thing as a new morality.

“There is only one morality. All else is immorality.

“There is only true Christian ethics over against which stands the whole of paganism.

“If we are to fulfill our great destiny as a people, then we must return to the old morality, the sole morality....

“All these blatant sham reformers, in the name of a new morality, preach the old vice of self-indulgence which rotted out first the moral fiber and then even the external greatness of Greece and Rome."15

In biblical comparison, Jesus showed mercy by healing the sick and giving sanity back to the deranged, but never did he kill them.

This attitude was exemplified by Mother Teresa of Calcutta, whose version of "death with dignity" is to gather the dying from off the street, and show compassion to these rejected and abandoned members of the human race, all the while knowing that they may only survive for another half hour.

Her "mercy-living" movement goes to great trouble to house, wash and feed even the most hopeless and derelict, because of inherent respect for the "sanctity of life" of each individual.

This attitude is summed up in her statement:

"I see Jesus in every human being. I say to myself, this is hungry Jesus, I must feed him. This is sick Jesus. This one has leprosy or gangrene; I must wash him and tend to him. I serve because I love Jesus."16

Will America chose the "sanctity of life" concept, as demonstrated by Mother Teresa, or will America chose the "quality of life" concept, championed by self-proclaimed doctors of death court decisions - such as in the case of Terri Schiavo - and continue its slide toward Auschwitz?

What kind of subtle anesthetic has been allowed to deaden our national conscience?

What horrors await us?

The question is not whether the suffering and dying person's life should be terminated, the question is what kind of nation will we become if they are? Their physical death is preceded only by our moral death!

[AndyTheBear]

Are there any threads that you have not posted this on. We get it, already.

I haven't seen it before. I'm just part of the we who doesn't read every thread. I'm also part of the we that sometimes makes the same point on similar threads, when I feel it is necessary.

[Diogenesis]

Another irony is that millions of Americans contributed $$$$, energy, and love to repeatedly storm-wracked Florida.
And now? Now there are millions who are scratching their heads at the evil that survived there.

This Atrocity is Judicial Murder by Starvation and Dehydration

ALL JUDGES INVOLVED SHOULD BE IMPEACHED FOR CONSIPIRACY TO MURDER

[atlaw]

Maybe you can help. I seem to have missed the part where the Nazis spent a decade medically evaluating each victim and litigating the living daylights out of the propriety of their demise. Got some cites?

[JamminJAY]

TerriRepublic has gone way beyond "just throwing around" the Nazi charge

How true I'm sick of these folks. After the words they have blasted about I have no mercy for such rotten people.

Jammer

[dmz]

Do you cut and paste your comments on all of the threads in a day on a particular topic? TheDon and I have spoken privately and he knows I meant no real harm.

[Blzbba]

""No, the connection was between the murder of unborn children and 9/11. I do not know if God will send judgement for the public murder of Terri Schiavo. If he does we will deserve it."

Perfect example of fanaticism. We will all die because we don't conform to your NARROW view. "


Good point, Soul. Yet, the same 'Nazis' we're being compared to also held similar, narrow POVs and killed anyone who disagreed.



"You people want to compare America to nazi Germany? "


The funny, ironic part about the Nazi comparisons is that the Nazis were the ruling party during their atrocities. Taking this comparison to its logical conclusion means these right-wing fanatics MUST believe that George W. Bush is indeed Hitler (since Republicans are the ruling party these days), making them closer to George Soros and those idiots at MoveOn.org than they probably realize!!

[AndyTheBear]

Actually, I stopped short of calling it an ad homonym fallacy directly. I asked you what other purpose you characterization served other then such a fallacy.

I'm not sure how you want the reader to interpret your "No" answer to this challenge. Being that literally it is an admission that such a fallacy was your only purpose.

[Blzbba]

"Another irony is that millions of Americans contributed $$$$, energy, and love to repeatedly storm-wracked Florida.
And now? Now there are millions who are scratching their heads at the evil that survived there. "



C'mon - you can't blame the entire state! I mean, in late 2000, the Dummycrats were similarly holding all of Florida to blame for Bush getting elected!

Both cases involve the judiciary system more than the individuals living in the state, millions of which were in favor of letting Terri live.

[Diogenesis]

This is the 'tip of the iceberg' of what Terri and her family were up against.

Here’s where Terri Schiavo Insurance money went:

These funds, the result of a malpractice suit, were meant solely to provide for Terri Schiavo’s care and rehabilitation.
=======================================================================================
Atty. Gwyneth Stanley - $10,668.05
Atty. Deborah Bushnell - $65,607.00
Atty. Steve Nilson - $7,404.95
Atty. Pacarek - $1,500.00
Atty. Richard Pearse (GAL) - $4,511.95
Atty. George Felos - $397,249.99
1st Union/South Trust Bank – $55,459.85
Michael Schiavo - $10,929.95
Total: $545,852.34

---

Neglect and abuse complaints is that Michael Schiavo:

* Has not allowed therapy or rehabilitation since late 1992.
* Has prevented swallowing tests or swallowing therapy since 1993.
* Ordered caretakers not to clean Terri's teeth since 1995, resulting in removal of five teeth in April 2004.
* Placed Terri in hospice in 2000, despite the fact she is not terminally ill.
* Refuses to allow Terri to leave her room. She has not been outside since 2000.
* Ordered doctors not to treat Terri when she had a life threatening infection in 1993 and 1995.

---

Fbolton Virtually as soon as Michael Schiavo received the monies from the medical malpractice claim involving his wife, Terri Schindler-Schiavo,
he withheld all therapy and rehabilitation services from her.

Terri Schiavo had sustained a serious brain injury as the result of a suspicious incident in their home in 1990 and in 1992,
her husband had filed claims against several of her former doctors, claiming her “collapse” was caused by a misdiagnosis.
He received over $1.5 million in 1993 including $750,000 which had been specifically earmarked by the trial jury for Terri’s rehabilitation based on a life expectancy of 50 years.
Mary and Bob Schindler Sr., her parents, consulted a St. Petersburg attorney about removing Michael Schiavo as their daughter’s guardian and discussed the case at length with him.
Unfortunately, the Schindlers did not have the amount of money the attorney demanded as a retainer to take the case.
That attorney became the judge in the case-----a totally prohibited conflict of interest.
Thereafter, the attorney-judge approved the hiring of George Felos as the attorney for Schiavo to be paid from the trust fund and the stage was set for her judicial homicide.
The judge wasn’t George W. Greer.
It was Mark I. Shames.

---

The money was then diverted to the Judicide G reer.

	GREER DONOR	AMOUNT	POSITION	ACTION
Lawyers For Michael Schiavo	Hamden Baskin III    Felos & Felos            Deborah Bushnell     Gyneth S. Stanley    Steven Nilsson         Beth Wilson	$500  & $500 $250 $250 $150 and $250 $250 and $250 $250 and $100	Michael Schiavo’s Lawyer[s]	Greer denies many or all of Schindler’s in favor of Felos Greer Allows hearsay as evidence/disallows Schindler’s statements Felos former chairman of board of directors of Hospice of Florida Suncoast
	Daniel Grieco	$300	Employer of Michael Schiavo at time of Feb. 25, 1990 then attorneyOf record for Michael up until the malpractice award,	Incident when injuries occurred to Terri,Reappeared as attorney for selected pleadings
State/County Employees/Elected	Frank Nagatani	$50 and $50	DCF Attorney	Squashed testimony for DCF Investigator to appear on behalf of abuse allegations
	Bernie McCabe	In-Kind	State Attorney	Allowed underling to appear in campaign ad for Greer Will not call Grand Jury
	Everett Rice	$500 & In-Kind	Sheriff/State Rep	Didn’t conduct criminal investigation into what really happened to Terri or allegations of abuse after initial incident Allowed Deputy & use of county property to appear in campaign ad for Greer
	John Carassas	$100	Deputy Attorney General	Florida Deputy Attorney General, involvement with Rice in Sept. 2003 motion for Greer recusal dueTo improper discussion of case
	James Hellickson	$150 & In Kind	Assistant state attorney in office of Bernie McCabe, Pinellas/Pasco State Attorney	Appeared in Greer Campaign Ad
	Paula Shea	In Kind	Assistant Pinellas Public Defender	Appeared in Greer Campaign Ad
	Andrew Sasso	$100	Officer in Guardianship monitoring program and Guardian ad litem pool	Was supposed to: “evaluate information about the well-being and property of all persons adjudicated of having a legal incapacity so that the court can fulfill its legal obligation to protect and preserve the interests of the ward,” FL COURTS
Misc. People w connections	Richard La Belle	$100	Member of Board of Directors of Advocacy Center for Persons with Disabilities	Supposedly ACPD doing investigation into Schiavo case
	Battaglia, Ross, Disus and Wein	$250	Principal Kelli Crabb is past chairperson of Hospice Foundation of Florida Suncoast and member of Board of directors
	Gus Bilirakis	$40 cash	Former Hospice Board member and of American Hellonic Education Progressive Assoc. (AHEPA)	Felos past Governor
	Divito and Higham	$250 and $250	Law firm employed by St. Petersburg/Venice Dioceses	Terri’s Dioceses

 

 

 

 

More? Click here

---

The Rule of Terri's Case Strikes Again. -2004- Judge Greer's crimes

---

Law conveniently changed by Hospice where Terri is dying

---

MICHAEL SCHIAVO's private Insurance company
JERGER & CENTONZE INSURNACE AGENCY, INC.
Notice how 'insurance' is conveniently misspelled

---

MICHAEL SCHIAVO'S lies and contradictory testimony in easy to read format

---

scientology_and_terri_schindler_schiavo_death_connection

[lugsoul]

You must practice a lot to be able to generalize that grossly.

You asked if my view applied to everyone who doesn't agree with me. I responded that it did not. That does not mean, however, that my characterization of what this forum has become is any less accurate, because there are persons who haven't succumbed to the mass hysteria.

Go back to logic class.

[atlaw]

The funny, ironic part about the Nazi comparisons is that the Nazis were the ruling party during their atrocities. Taking this comparison to its logical conclusion means these right-wing fanatics MUST believe that George W. Bush is indeed Hitler (since Republicans are the ruling party these days)

ROFL. Well Diogenesis? Inquiring minds want to know. Is George W. the spawn of Hitler?

[Blzbba]

"I seem to have missed the part where the Nazis spent a decade medically evaluating each victim and litigating the living daylights out of the propriety of their demise. "



HEY!!! Don't introduce a logical point in an illogical comparison!!

Besides, if this is Nazism, then by logical extension, these people think Bush is indeed Hitler, since he is our leader at the moment and didn't stop Terri's death.

[Diogenesis]

Maybe you missed my post.

This Atrocity is Judicial Murder by Starvation and Dehydration

ALL JUDGES INVOLVED SHOULD BE IMPEACHED FOR CONSIPIRACY TO MURDER

[RightWhale]

a gross mis-statement

The Binding pamphlet was 1920. Maybe some of those who adopted the philosophy were Nazis, but the statement of an unworthy life was already there before Nazis. That is unworthy life, not life not worth living. Why are they sugar-coating this?

[Ursus arctos horribilis]

After listening to the death lawyer Fellos, I now have a very clear understanding as to the thought processes of the Nazis in justifying the murder of millions as a beautiful and good thing to do.

The judicial role in Terri's murder was aided and abetted by the out of control lawyer/judge/court incestuous relationships. I also now understand much better why it is a matter of life or death for the liberals to remain in control of said judicial system.

[AndyTheBear]

Do you cut and paste your comments on all of the threads in a day on a particular topic?

No I don't. I wasn't aware that some people were cutting and pasting like this. Perhaps I misunderstood the context of your comment.

Another annoying practice I have noticed in Freeper debates is the repeated use of the same old collection of voluminous links. In particular when the other guy considers you completely ignorant until you've poured through his own favorite growing collection of related sites.

At a minimum, I think we owe each other a response to what the other person has actually written rather then using a kind of form letter response.

Probably most annoying of all are bears who refuse to make a sunsinct point, and their posts just go on, and on, and...well, er....never mind.

[atlaw]

Anybody who refers to an internet cite called "scientology and terri schindler schiavo death connection" and purports to see the underpinnings of a massive conspiracy in the misspelling of the word "insurance" needs to loosen the tinfoil a little.

By the way, have you got those cites I asked you for in post 163?

[Diogenesis]

I agree with you that the Scientologists were behind this.

I also agree with you that misspellings in an Official state filing of
MS' insurnance company was done to hide information.
Now the question is .... why?

[Irish_Thatcherite]

'Liberalism' will turn out a lot worse than Nazism - I am beginning to believe it's whole 'ethos' is about the ultimate destruction of Humanity - all roads seem to point there; falling birth rates, euthanasia, appeasement of evil.. the list goes on!

God grant rest to Terri.

[AndyTheBear]

Sorry, I took your answer of No to be to the second question asked. I suppose you took the second question as rhetorical, but I meant it as a challenge. If your only point was there was some hysteria, fine. But please understand it is easy infer you meant it as a premise to an implied argument that concluded that your side is right and the other side is wrong.

Go back to logic class.

Talk about irony.

In college I aced logic class easily. Most of the other students were struggling, and a few turned to me for help.

In national standardized tests I've scored in the top 1% in almost all the logic related sections.

For many years now I've earned a respectable living as a software engineer. Using logic everyday.