Posted on 03/26/2005 7:15:20 AM PST by Drango
Well Duh.. One said she screamed to live. No proof. justr the work of her crooked lawyer who first said on Hannity's radio show, that Trei did this on her own and she was the only one present, Now thr story is there were withessesd and we find she baddgered her to try to say I want to live. Give me a break.
Again you don't have the slighteast idea of the truth. There have been countless courts and countless judges look at the case and several state asnd local law enforcement agencies look into allegation s and they have been all negative. Need to get facts and not internet blog.
The courts are interpretering ther LAW AS WRITTEN.
Proves my point,, DU mentality here. They have provbably started a section over there called FR funnues.
Excuse me, but do you have any piece of paper or corroborating witness that says that Terri wanted to be starved to death?
It's amazing...you're talking about a populace which year after year has little sympathy for the bill of rights(The National Equirer use to do an informal poll almsot every year and the good ole Bill of Rights got canned over and over again)...If government shouldn't intervene to save someone whose Constitutional Right To Life is being denied, then it has no business interfering in "private" matters like racial discrimination,price fixing,monopolies or virtually any other thing...I'm really tired of people who look at every issue from a political context and not one from right and wrong...If this country thinks it's okay to continue to trample on people's rights in such a callous,thoughtless manner...than I have to conclude that this country ISN'T worth fighting for and maybe it's time to move....
If Pat Buchanan were President,we wouldn't have this tragedy taking place and we wouldn't be in idiotic wars in the Middle East...Thanks for reminding me of why I quit the GOP....
Sounds like what a whole lot of people have been doing on FR the past two weeks. There's been a lot of emotion and very little logic.
It doesn't really MATTER what the polls say - we don't decide morality based on polls. Even if 99% wanted Terri to die, that would still make it wrong.
In 1st century Jerusalem the majority wanted Jesus dead.
'Nuff said about the "masses" and their wants.
"Let's go back in time. So if 99% of Florida said it was ok to crucify Jesus, and 1% said it is not, since the majority, a whopping 99% thinks it's the right thing to do....that would make it ok?"
Didn't see your post earlier. Wrote exactly the same thing just now. Of course I agree with you 100% :-) It's worth repeating though.
No bias in this question. LOL
RE: "Poll after poll after poll show that the GOP is reading the tea leaves wrong. The Democrates are mum, while the Pubs commit fratricide."
That's some of the lousiest reasoning I've ever heard. Are you saying that FReepers should condone the murder of Terri Schiavo because weak-kneed,uncaring bastards the nation over would rather this case just go away? Do you think that "murder" is too strong a word? Well, what else do you call the actions of an adulterous husband who's willing to go through hell and high water to take his debilitated wife's life (by most accounts) AGAINST HER WILL. This is not a Right-to-Die case; this is a right to murder with impunity case.
Citizens of Florida to America: "Let the b***h burn". It's a more accurate headline, if you ask me. The unfortunate truth of the matter is that doing the right thing is rarely if ever the popular thing, people on the whole are lazy, selfish and evil from birth, and pure Democracy is an ugly mob rule. The citizens of Florida are showing us that even today.
What little bit of "Christian love" I had stored up has run out, several days after the last shreds of my faith in this country died. I don't know if God will bless Terri, but I hope he damns Michael.
MikeinIraq, you wish to speak of governmental interference in individual rights cases? Let us speak of a judge telling a mother and father that they cannot take photos or video of their dying daughter. How's that for interference?
I find myself on the opposite side of this equation from you. I have read the transcripts and the rulings, and this judge, Greer, should never have been elected dogcatcher, much less put into a position that would mete out a death sentence on a disabled woman.
New poll from Time...I'll look for the questions.
Poll Results
Opinion polls, including one that Time magazine issued today, showed that most Americans opposed Congress's intervention in the Schiavo case. Three-quarters of Americans believe Congress's action was wrong and 70 percent maintain President George Bush was wrong to intervene, according to the Time poll.
The poll also showed that 69 percent said they would want a guardian to remove their feeding tube if they were in Schiavo's place. A majority, 53 percent, of those who call themselves born- again Christians or Evangelicals agree with the decision to remove Schiavo's feeding tube.
The telephone survey of 1,010 adults was conducted March 22- 24 and had an overall margin of error of 3 percentage points.
I, for one, have never stated it's a conspiracy. I have stated how disgusted I am that polls are conducted on whether she lives or dies, and how furious I am that the people have chosen Death. THAT I have a problem with.
Nevertheless, I don't support what is right based on what the American say. never have, never will. And I appluad the GOP's actions.
Poll after poll after poll was known before they took action. Please do not mis-represent the facts. The GOP knew it was unpopular and still rose to action.
More so, they did what was the right.
The Judiciary is part of the Government.
They call him Pilate!
Who cares about the polls? 95% of the people polled are not familiar with the details of this case. Just wait until this whole mess is investigated, exposed, and written up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.