Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A picture of Jeffords at the Announcment of Howard Dean Running For President on June 23, 2003 12:00 Noon Church Street and Bank Street Burlington, Vermont


1 posted on 03/26/2005 6:01:48 AM PST by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: AmericanMade1776

If that Pic is too small of Jeffords you can see the larger version at this URL http://ahynes1.homeip.net:8000/dean/june23/103_0322.JPG


2 posted on 03/26/2005 6:02:51 AM PST by AmericanMade1776 ( The Year of Freeping Dangerously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776

Jeffords is a bedwetter that wishes he was as tall as Dashole, other than wants and wishes he lacks a sack for his hot air.


4 posted on 03/26/2005 6:05:37 AM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776

Jeffords is a liberal.

He ran as a republican...vecause he did not think he could win other wise.

Which means he was stabbing republicans in the backs before.

Well......now he his known as a democrap. No other way around it.

Send him packing.


6 posted on 03/26/2005 6:05:58 AM PST by ArmyBratproud (<img src="http://www.959theranch.com/images/firstpage/95/LeDoux%20Banner%202.JPG">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776

What a loser! He still thinks it's all about him. Talk about irrelevant!

vaudine


7 posted on 03/26/2005 6:06:31 AM PST by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776

Jumping Jim Jeffords. Don't try to tell me that white men cannot jump.


9 posted on 03/26/2005 6:07:57 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776
The Vermont independent said he expects to be the Republican Party's "No. 1 target." He said he expects to be treated like former U.S. Sen. Tom Daschle.

I'm certainly no expert on Vermont politics, but when I read the quoted paragraph, my antennae went up. Jeffords the #1 target? That didn't sound right. And sure enough if you read the entire article you'll see the Republicans are anything but confident and united in taking on Jeffords.

This is nothing more than Jeffords trying to draw attention to himself and raise money and support in anticipation of what in fact looks to be a rather tepid GOP effort to unseat him.

10 posted on 03/26/2005 6:08:03 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776

"Jeffords said he knew the GOP would be angry with him for switching in 2001 and he also figured it would mean an aggressive election season five years down the road."


OK... whats his point? He knows hes a true Democrat who lied about being a Republican. He's not a bullseye he's a footnote in history an a soon to be unemployed politician.


11 posted on 03/26/2005 6:09:12 AM PST by Rockiesrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776
"I have no regrets of what I did," Jeffords said.

Neither did Benedict Arnold.....

15 posted on 03/26/2005 6:13:42 AM PST by cbkaty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776
"I have no regrets of what I did," Jeffords said.

Then quit whimpering and whining, Jeffords.

17 posted on 03/26/2005 6:15:04 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776
The Vermont independent also said he expects to be the Republican Party's "No. 1 target."

We can only hope.

19 posted on 03/26/2005 6:16:51 AM PST by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776
This "nasty part (of the election)" is something in which the Vermont Socialist Senator would have working knowledge of since he practices it daily towards his former Party.

The only Senator I have heard speak "nastier" towards his fellow elected officials is "Leaky Leahy."

Let's turn that little "turncoat" into the "former Senator from Vermont" and make it the nastiest (meaning truthful) in Vermont History!

20 posted on 03/26/2005 6:20:54 AM PST by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776
Hey Jeffords. As I recall, you made a whole bunch of side deals with the Democrats in return for you turning traitor.

So, how are those deals coming along? They keeping their side of the bargain?

24 posted on 03/26/2005 6:26:20 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776

26 posted on 03/26/2005 6:32:57 AM PST by mathprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776; sure_fine

Jeffords, Snowe, Cantwell, McCain — whom have I left out? — need to be targeted and removed from the US Senate.


27 posted on 03/26/2005 6:34:05 AM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino • Visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776

Jeffords trying to delude himself into believing he's relevant.


29 posted on 03/26/2005 6:36:11 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776
Jeffords should be forced to run on his performance and his voting record. He should not be allowed to be a "victim". Let the people of Vermont decide if they want such a person to represent them after 2006.
33 posted on 03/26/2005 6:43:50 AM PST by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776

he didn't expect to be a hero, did he?


38 posted on 03/26/2005 6:53:08 AM PST by ken21 ( if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776
He said he expects to be treated like former U.S. Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., who was pounded by the GOP during the last election cycle and, as a result, lost his re-election bid.

Actually, Jimbo, Daschle lost because more people voted for the other guy. That's how elections work...

If this guy thinks the 'Pubbies sit around pining for that Senate seat from Vermont, he's dreaming. They will work to defeat Jeffords, just as they will work to defeat every other Democrat (excuse me, Independent) in the Senate.

39 posted on 03/26/2005 6:57:08 AM PST by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776

Considering that Jefford's betrayal of trust was far greater than even that of Tom Daschle, I should say that he is targeted in the 2006 election. He expected the Republicans NOT to put up a nominee for his seat in the next election? They had thought they had elected a Republican in 2000, and everybody saw how that turned out.


40 posted on 03/26/2005 6:57:35 AM PST by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMade1776
What Jeffords believed what that it was very likely that the Republicans would lose control of the Senate in 2002.

After all the last president to not lose senate seats in his second year in office was FDR in 1934. That took a massive depression to bring about. So Jeffords figured he would be in the minority by 2003. But if he went with the Democrats and gave them the senate in 2001, he would be in the majority for at least the next 8 years.

Jeffords figured that the Democrats would gain control of the Senate in 2002. It was also very likely that in 2004 that the Republicans would lose more seats. That is what history taught.

What Jeffords thought he was doing was remaining in the majority from 2001 to 2003 and keeping majority status from 2003 until at least 2009. He saw it as a win win situation for him. If the Senate stayed close, the Democrats would really need him.. He could always get lots of perks and power in exchange for his votes.

All jeffords got was what he already had ... being in the majority from 2001 to 2003. Then he lost what he would have had if he had remained a Republican.. He was relegated to the minority. He may stay their until perhaps 2010. He is now in a situation where he is of no value to the Democrats and no value to the Republicans. Jeffords is reduced to the state of having nothing to offer either side. As a turn coat neither side trusts him. He is at best a nothing.. with nowhere to go and nothing with which to negotiate.

Jeffords became an independent thinking he could command power by being a deciding vote. But Daschle once the Senate was lost to Democrats did not try to get things done. Daschle tried to block everything. Dashcle only needed 40 Democratic votes. He did not need Jeffords at all. And the Repubicans had no way of getting 60 votes. They had no use for Jeffords either and tons of reasons to screw him. So no one has needed Jeffords after 2002. His phone calls are not returned.

Now with the Republicans having 55 seats and likely to gain more seats in 2006, Jeffords is in a terrible position. The Democrats don't need his vote and the Republicans don't need his vote. And since he jumped ship, neither side would trust him farther than they could throw him.

What Jeffords did was place copious amounts of excrement in his own nest. Now he wants us to believe he does not regret doing it and really likes the smell.

He is just trying to convince the folks back home that he is important. Let's hope they figure out he is not important to anyone..anymore.

41 posted on 03/26/2005 7:14:34 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson