Posted on 03/25/2005 1:22:30 PM PST by Flavius
BOGOTA, Colombia (Reuters) - Colombian police have found a homemade submarine capable of carrying $200 million (107.8 million pounds) worth of cocaine on a Pacific Ocean smuggling mission, police say.
Police, who acted on a tip, made no arrests after finding the submarine hidden in the port of Tumaco, near the border with Ecuador, the Administrative Security Department detective force said on Friday
It was the second publicized case of Colombian drug smugglers trying to use submarines. In 2000, another underwater vessel was found far from the coast in the Andean mountain capital, Bogota.
"They started building the submarine about six months ago, using small pieces so as not to make people suspicious. They wanted to have it ready for Easter because they thought the police would drop their guard," said Eduardo Fernandez, head of the DAS in the southern province of Valle del Cauca.
He did not say where the submarine appeared to be headed or how far it could travel. The vessel had the capacity to carry 10 tonnes of cocaine, which could be worth from $200 million to $300 million on U.S. streets.
Colombia's drug smugglers are always looking for ways of getting cocaine and heroin into big markets such as the United States and Europe. Methods include having people known as "mules" swallow drugs wrapped up in condoms, or hiding cocaine or heroin in cargo such as dog food.
Funds from cocaine help buy bullets for Marxist rebels and far-right paramilitary outlaws fighting a four-decade-old war, which claims thousands of lives a year. Colombia is the world's largest producer of cocaine and a major supplier of heroin to the United States.
Disclaimer, not the photo from the story
An el-Qaeda submarine fleet?
My science project!!
Ohhhhh nw_az!!!!
You did it again!!!!
THIS look familiar???
Remember all those messages you found about submarines?
Yup
10 tons of cocaine? If she was depth-charged and sunk that would leave a pretty good slick...or would you call it a line?
Run Silent, Run Coke
And how many unpublicized cases are there? Face it ... the drug war is being lost and cannot be won.
I'm thinking that the reliability of a "homemade submarine" might be somewhere along the lines of a hand knitted parachute.
Submarines: Not Just for the Navy
By Louise Knapp
Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,46612,00.html
02:00 AM Sep. 20, 2001 PT
There's a growing number of would-be Captain Nemos visiting the octopus' garden in their own yellow submarines.
Building your own personal sub is a new hobby that is taking off like a torpedo.
A rarity a few years ago, there are now scores of people designing, building and diving their own submarines.
"It's definitely growing in popularity," said Ray Keefer, who runs the PSubs (Personal Submersibles), website. "When we started (five years ago) there were four members. Now we have around 160."
These days, small submarines are relatively easy and cheap to build; although at around $15,000 a pop they're not everyone's idea of a stocking stuffer.
Keefer estimated there are 50 to 100 privately owned personal submarines currently plumbing the depths of American waters.
Building a sub isn't rocket science, either. John Farrington and Monica Lemay, a couple from Austin, Texas, are building their own two-seat submarine in their garage.
"When we tell people that we are building a submarine, most think we must mean a model submarine," Farrington said.
The couple are welding their sub out of steel. When it's completed, it will look like the mini-subs used on oil rigs, or by Jacques Cousteau.
The sub will weigh two tons and dive to about 350 feet - a depth equivalent to a 30-story skyscraper.
"Our local lake has a maximum depth of 180 feet which is too deep for scuba diving," Farrington said. "In the submarine, we can easily get down to this depth and we can stay down much longer than a scuba diver could."
The sub could stay underwater for 48 hours, but it's unlikely the couple will be submerged for more than a few hours at a time.
Unlike custom cars, the sub is not being made from a kit, although the couple did spend $350 on a set of plans.
The couple is building the main hull out of quarter-inch-thick steel. In order for them to be able to weld the sub together themselves, both took welding classes.
"We ordered the bulk of the material from a Texas boilermaker," Farrington said. "The material is easy to find -- you just need to find someone who makes pressure vessels or boilers."
In fact, all the parts are either raw blocks of metal that have to be machined into a specific part, or are a basic shape, like the cylinder for the hull.
By doing most of the work themselves, the couple hopes to trim the estimated cost from $15,000 to about $10,000.
The sub will be driven by five battery-powered motors. A main motor at the tail will be for thrust; four smaller motors will maneuver the craft.
With the pilot sitting upright in the conning tower -- or the hatch -- and the passenger seated or lying down in the back, the sub will be launched from a trailer, just like a traditional motor boat.
The sub will have 10 windows, all made from a special kind of Plexiglas, and maintain atmospheric pressure, eliminating the danger of getting the bends.
But there's one important aspect that has not yet been decided: the color.
"A lot of people suggest yellow but we will probably go for a World War II-type look with a dark gray or black," Farrington said. "But we may end up with an Austin Powers sub with flowers and things painted on it."
The sub should be finished by next spring.
The sub's construction is documented on the couple's website.
For Farrington and Lemay, both consultants for IBM and certified scuba divers, the attraction of a submarine is its social aspect.
"We will be able to talk to each other down there -- we can take food down with us, listen to a CD player," Farrington said.
The couple is preparing to fully test their sub before going on a manned expedition. They will lower the submarine, unmanned, to 500 feet and leave it there for one hour. If it manages to be watertight, they believe it should be safe to use down to 350 feet.
Despite the apparent ease and affordability, building a submarine is not for everyone, PSub's Keefer warns.
"I wouldn't recommend it to someone who is just going to stick a couple of pieces of cardboard together," Keefer said. "They are asking to kill themselves. Building a sub is not something you want to approach without a lot of research and technical savvy."
The cost of losing a submarine has got to hurt the drug runners a lot. I don't think there's any such thing as a truly cheap sub.
That thing looks like an oak zeppelin.
"the drug war is being lost and cannot be won."
It can be won but it must be fought on our borders.
"$200 million (107.8 million pounds) worth of cocaine "
Wow, the price of Cocaine has really gone down!
You can't fight the marketplace.
That's all real nice but show me one that can hold even one ton of cocaine.
See my point?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.