Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeal For Schiavo is Filed At Supreme Court by Parents
Yahoo News

Posted on 03/23/2005 8:07:00 PM PST by sonsofliberty2000

TAMPA, Fla. (AP) A lawyer for Terri Schiavo's parents says an appeal to try to keep the brain-damaged woman alive has been filed with the U.S. Supreme Court.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: schiavo; scotus; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 441-458 next last
To: EGPWS
I just meant to convey that I agree with you and sensed that your prudence in posting prevented you from stating your true feeling more graphically my FRiend.

Yep. Everyone is on edge. I'm restraining myself considerably.

201 posted on 03/23/2005 9:03:07 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (You have a //cuckoo// God given right //Yeeeahrgh!!// to be an //Hello?// atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

I do not see it that way.

Look for blue states to slowly and quietly change their laws to reflect Florida's law.

Heresay is a good way to clear out the old folks.

And after the way it's been sanctioned by all the courts, it'll be legal, too!


202 posted on 03/23/2005 9:03:21 PM PST by freecopper01 (" The amount of people who are making fun of a blueprint for genocide is an alarming thing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I am not anti-Italian but the name may just end up like the other verb "a Lewinski"


203 posted on 03/23/2005 9:03:29 PM PST by glowworm ( Rats and rat behavior, a rat is a rat is a rat..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: patriciamary
the liberal agenda is alive and growing stronger!

I respectfully do not agree that it is growing stronger. I do believe that you are correct that the liberal agenda is "alive", but I believe that the general public is tiring of various aspects of it.

Can you imagine how different the social landscape would look with a Gore or Kerry presidency, no internet to "catch" Gunga Dan and his ilk, no conservative radio, etc. I think that things have improved concerning the liberal agenda the last several years.

204 posted on 03/23/2005 9:04:11 PM PST by Lawgvr1955 (Never draw to an inside straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: northernlightsII

By the way, I did not come off as "screaming" did I? How do you think I did? Be candid. I'm curious.


205 posted on 03/23/2005 9:04:31 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
"the thing that keeps going through my mind is : did terri's family ever sue for guardianship based on the fact she was being denied treatment ? if not, why not ??? they had years to do that."

I think they have tried, but I'm new to this controversy. You would think that based on his testimony in her medical malpractice suit that he wanted to take care of her for the rest of her life. The jury awarded him (I think 2 mil) for her rehabilitation and then he turned around and paid his atty five hun. thousand for legal fees, that the Judge wouldn't question that!! MS stopped all treatment in her rehabilitation!!! Has lived with a woman and fathered two children by her!!! You would think think her family could have a case based on his motives as a guardian!!
206 posted on 03/23/2005 9:04:37 PM PST by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: northernlightsII

I wonder what else he can do using the power of EO.


207 posted on 03/23/2005 9:05:53 PM PST by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: glowworm

The guy that called in was Italian - he gave the correct pronunciation of his name/MS - and the real meaning of his name.

Your right - we just might have a new verb - although I hope I never hear his name again.


208 posted on 03/23/2005 9:08:23 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: JonDavid
Here's an example of when the executive branch had to intervine with a state. Notice that the state and federal courts often upheld segregation.

http://www.centralhigh57.org/1957-58.htm

February 8, 1956 The NAACP files suit on behalf of 33 black children denied admittance to four white schools.

August 28, 1956 Federal Judge John E. Miller dismisses the NAACP suit, declaring the Little Rock School Board had acted in "utmost good faith" in its integration plan. The NAACP files an appeal.

April 29, 1957 The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis upholds Judge Miller's dismissal.

Spring, 1957 There were 517 black students who lived in the Central High district and were eligible to attend Central in the fall. Eighty expressed an interest in doing so. Following interviews with the Superintendent and staff, 17 are selected for the first year of integration at Central. Eight of those later decide to remain at all-black Horace Mann High School.

Summer, 1957 With desegregation scheduled for September, opponents organize the Capital Citizens Council and the Mother's League of Central High School.

August 27, 1957 A member of the Mother's League files a motion seeking a temporary injunction against school integration. Pulaski County Chancellor Murray Reed grants the injunction "on the grounds that integration could lead to violence."

August 30, 1957 Federal District Judge Ronald Davies nullifies the injunction.

September 2, 1957 Governor Orval Faubus calls out the Arkansas National Guard to surround Little Rock Central High School to preserve the peace and avert violence that may be caused by extremists who came to Little Rock "in caravans."

September 3, 1957 Judge Davies orders desegregation to start the next day.

September 4, 1957 The nine black students attempt to enter Central High but are turned away by the National Guard.

September 9, 1957 The Council of Church Women issues a statement opposing segregation and deploring the Governor's calling out the guard. It calls for a citywide prayer service for September 12.

September 20, 1957 Judge Davies rules that Faubus had used the troops to prevent integration, not to preserve law and order as he claimed. The Governor removes the Guardsmen and the Little Rock Police Department takes over.

September 23, 1957 As a crowd of 1,000 mills around in front of the school, the nine black students go inside through a side door. A white student takes them to the principal's office where they are to receive their class assignments. When the mob learns the students are inside, it becomes unruly and the police fear they will be unable to maintain control. The black students are taken out of the school through a side door.

September 24, 1957 Little Rock Mayor Woodrow Mann sends President Eisenhower a telegram asking for federal troops to maintain order and complete the integration process. The President announces he is sending 1,000 members of the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock. He federalizes the 10,000-man Arkansas National Guard.

September 25, 1957 Under escort by the Army troops, the nine black students are escorted back into Central High.

209 posted on 03/23/2005 9:08:37 PM PST by pulaskibush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: m87339

OK, You're for death and I'm for life, see you tomorrow, I sure hope I'm right and not you.. God help you!


210 posted on 03/23/2005 9:09:35 PM PST by MJY1288 (The Democrats are the party for the death of the innocent and life for the wicked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

I am sorry but Jeb would have never came out today and named this statute if he was not intending to do something?
Why hold the news conference....just to shut up all the supporters of Terry?


211 posted on 03/23/2005 9:11:01 PM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nimbysrule

Well said.


212 posted on 03/23/2005 9:11:46 PM PST by i_dont_chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

Well, thanks. You know federal judges are not elected and have lifetime tenure -- so the only way to try and control the federal bench is 1) elect Presidents and Senators who you believe will appoint and confirm decent judges. It's a crapshoot, but the only means right now. Actually, most of Bushes' nominations have been quite good - with two really outstanding ones in poor Miguel Estrada and William Pryor. The other method is a real long shot and that's to urge your Senators and Congress members to impeach federal judges. It's next to impossible - I know of exactly one - from Las Vegas - who was removed, and I think it was because they found he was on the take from the Mob. We have a really out of control one here on the 9th Jerkoff in Cali who has said flat out he sees his role as a social activist and nothing's ever stuck with him. So as I said, it's a real long shot. But maybe after this worth some more effort.

State judges you have a bit more control over. They are usually elected or appointed by the Governor. IF the latter, they have to be reconfirmed by election, even state Supreme Court and appellate judges. I believe a lot of this takeover has resulted from good folks not knowing anything about judicial candidates. DO NOT FOLLOW the local Bar Association or newspaper endorsements. Instead, find a good local conservative legal action group or attorney (like Mark Levin) and get their take. In 1986, we cleaned out a leftist gang from the California Supreme Court, including the chief justice, through grassroots movement.

I of course would be honored to assist in any way possible.


213 posted on 03/23/2005 9:11:52 PM PST by nimbysrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Now, remind me again how many caes Boise has won? :-)


214 posted on 03/23/2005 9:12:10 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush

THANKS - I was trying to write about this the other day, and of course didn't have my facts and thought it was Mississippi!! Of course it was Arkansas.


215 posted on 03/23/2005 9:13:25 PM PST by nimbysrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Good job!
I noticed that he was a little more circumspect tonight about his pronouncements,probably because like most of us he no clue how SCOTUS is going to go.
Regarding the Scindler representation,I have been a little surprised to see him on TV so much when there were so many things to go over.
For this appeal to Scotus,will he get outside (ie.heavyweight)help. The Justices are probably pretty picky about all sorts of stuff that a newbie may not know about.
216 posted on 03/23/2005 9:13:53 PM PST by northernlightsII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: m87339

You will win that bet.


217 posted on 03/23/2005 9:14:01 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (This just in from CBS: "There is no bias at CBS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Enough to get him to be very rich. And he beat the pants off of Bush's lawyers in appellate argument in my opinion until Olson got involved, and cleaned up the mess of that incompetent Bush retained (not the trial lawyer, that other guy with the longish grey hair). He is a fine lawyer.


218 posted on 03/23/2005 9:15:17 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

He lost his last big three - Bush v. Gore, Microsoft and Napster (which I think was eventually settled by some settlement quite disadvantageous to Napster, Boies' client. I listened to him very closely in all the election 2000 arguments and he's very good at making spurious arguments and misciting authorities. I thought his arguments before SCOTUS in Bush v. Gore really stunk. But he does have two books out now and gets on TV, so who am I?


219 posted on 03/23/2005 9:16:33 PM PST by nimbysrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: hershey
Napolitano said during the discussion that the legal issues so far seem to have been that she had a fair review...and the law was followed.

Yes, and he's been wrong so many other times before. I don't pay much attention to the guy any more.
He thinks the doctors that checked Terri were giving their unbiased diagnoses, ignoring the fact those doctors were hired by Terri's husband. Funny he'd not notice that, aye?

220 posted on 03/23/2005 9:16:48 PM PST by concerned about politics (Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 441-458 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson