[spunkets]

"tapes... which now are public record in the Pinellas County Courthouse."

So they might be now. In 2003 they were not. The snippets of doc B's were released. Doc Bambakidis's exam lasted less than 45mins, as I remember.

" The St. Petersburg Times reviewed all four hours of tapes"

I don't take reviews, especially by clown judges that claim to have seen the tapes, claim to be able of analyzing what they contain, and all, w/o exception, fail to flag Bambakidis's perjury. The times story is as bogus as the clowns they are writing about. I do my own analysis on what was released and what was not.

[syriacus]

I don't take reviews, especially by clown judges that claim to have seen the tapes,

A while back some folks were wondering how Greer could see the tapes of Terri, since he has such poor vision.

I don't think the tapes were played right in front of his face in court. Maybe he watched them up close somewhere else, but the "expert witness" should have been present, in order to explain what Greer was "seeing."

[Trinity_Tx]

"all, w/o exception, fail to flag Bambakidis's perjury. The times story is as bogus as the clowns they are writing about. I do my own analysis on what was released and what was not."


And it just occurred to me why we had all this confusion. You're mixing up Bambakadis and Cranford.

You're thinking about the time he said "good job" then testified that she couldn't follow it, huh?

That was Cranford. Greer had no reason to hide the tape, nor did he. Cranford didn't perjure himself. He talked about that plenty at trial. (I thought you said you read the transcripts)

Cranford said that because he did it twice after that and she didn't react. He said he was hoping he might have something and always talks as though they are aware, just in case. he was encouraging her.