Skip to comments.
Citizen’s Arrest of Schiavo Judge Planned (Bo Gritz)
Empire Journal
| 3.20.05
Posted on 03/21/2005 12:41:06 AM PST by ambrose
Citizens Arrest of Schiavo Judge Planned
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bogritz; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: gulfcoast6
Yeah, he's back alright. He gives the right wing a bad name.
21
posted on
03/21/2005 1:46:04 AM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(You have a //cuckoo// God given right //Yeeeahrgh!!// to be an //Hello?// atheist)
To: ambrose
Bo, give it a rest, you're embarrassing the rest of us and sounding like a damned fool.
--Boot Hill
22
posted on
03/21/2005 1:48:00 AM PST
by
Boot Hill
("I'm going on psychological nuances that most any super sensitive psychologist might be skilled in")
To: Boot Hill
Bo, give it a rest, you're embarrassing the rest of us and sounding like a damned fool.
I agree. That said, everyone should give Bo awesome respect for his service to the country. The man was a hero among giants.
23
posted on
03/21/2005 2:35:18 AM PST
by
GarySpFc
(Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
To: Slings and Arrows
From the article:
While threatened with arrest at Ruby Ridge and Jordon, Montana, when the smoke-cleared, the much decorated war hero instead walked away with FBI letters of appreciation. Time and events will soon tell if his presence is thus appreciated in Florida.
24
posted on
03/21/2005 2:39:30 AM PST
by
GarySpFc
(Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
To: BigSkyFreeper
If it ever came to a civil war, you would be thankful to have Bo Gritz protecting you while you hide in your little box (ò¿ó)
25
posted on
03/21/2005 2:42:27 AM PST
by
Dandydoodley
(If it talks and smells like a liberal, it ain't American (ò¿ó))
To: ambrose
william shatner once plannd to do a movie on Bo's life, but the project never got off the ground. I think this was around the T. J. Hooker era.
26
posted on
03/21/2005 2:50:14 AM PST
by
isom35
To: clee1
doesn't have to be a felony. well maybe in florida. I did a citizens arrest on a guy vandalizing a car.
27
posted on
03/21/2005 2:50:36 AM PST
by
KneelBeforeZod
( I'm going to open Cobra Kai dojos all over this valley!)
To: KneelBeforeZod
I know for a fact in Louisiana it has to be a felony, and I believe that to be the case in Georgia as well.
Don't know what it is elsewhere.
28
posted on
03/21/2005 2:55:50 AM PST
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: clee1
He may be nuts, but not in this case.
29
posted on
03/21/2005 3:11:39 AM PST
by
expatguy
(http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
To: GarySpFc
"everyone should give Bo awesome respect for his service to the country." You can play that card with someone else, his service record doesn't make him immune from receiving valid criticism. If he was man enough to face incoming rounds from the enemy, then he's man enough to face well intentioned criticism. And right now he's become an embarrassement to conservatives.
--Boot Hill
30
posted on
03/21/2005 3:12:04 AM PST
by
Boot Hill
("I'm going on psychological nuances that most any super sensitive psychologist might be skilled in")
To: Lancey Howard
Civil disobedience, as historically understood, is distinct from violent revolution. Thoreau, Gandhi, and ML King committed acts of civil disobedience, and knowingly, willingly paid the legal penalties for doing so. Civil disobedience connotes working within the system in order to change that system. Revolution is the complete overthrow of the existing order, usually violently. Two separate things.
While I would agree that civil disobedience is sometimes necessary in order to call attention to injustice, for example, I disagree that jury nullification is a proper venue for dissatisfaction with the status quo. Not sure of the context of your statement, but nullification (in my view, anyway) is more like an act of sabotage: an act lacking the moral authority of Thoreau-like civil disobedience or the physical courage of the armed revolutionary.
To: Lancey Howard
"Bad laws are bad laws. Civil disobedience is sometimes necessary, as is jury nullification."
The Apostle Paul said we are to obey the laws of the land. I think one key is remembering there are two kingdoms, visible and invisible.
I've been furious at Jeb Bush for not giving Terri food and water for 58 hours. That I think required civil disobedience, and required courage to do the right thing.
We are to obey God's laws before man's, and yet one of God's laws is that we are to try to obey the laws of the land.
To: ambrose
BTTT
(please see my tagline)
33
posted on
03/21/2005 5:27:52 AM PST
by
CedarDave
(Add keyword "TERRISCHIAVO" to every Terri thread to make future searching easier.)
To: GarySpFc
"everyone should give Bo awesome respect for his service to the country."
While I respect the service of anyone who served, that respect does not extend to any other aspects of their lives. If someone does things after their service that inspire contempt in my, then contempt is what they get for their actions.
Bo Gritz falls into that category. I respect his service, but have contempt for his current actions.
34
posted on
03/21/2005 6:34:07 AM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: MineralMan
While I respect the service of anyone who served, that respect does not extend to any other aspects of their lives. If someone does things after their service that inspire contempt in my, then contempt is what they get for their actions.
Bo Gritz falls into that category. I respect his service, but have contempt for his current actions.
I do not respect Bo's membership in the Christian Identity movement. Likewise, I have even less respect for someone who labels themselves a "godless atheist."
35
posted on
03/21/2005 8:40:37 AM PST
by
GarySpFc
(Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
To: sinkspur; BigSkyFreeper; GarySpFc; Squantos
It's almost comical that some people are calling Gritz a "nazi" when he's trying to SAVE a disabled person from being "disposed of".
Who's the nazi again?
I don't care what his beliefs are at this point. What he's doing might be out of line, but at least he's doing something.
36
posted on
03/21/2005 9:30:42 AM PST
by
pocat
To: pocat
He was one of the guys arrested trying to gain entry to her room to give her water.
37
posted on
03/21/2005 9:36:27 AM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: pocat
I don't care what his beliefs are at this point. What he's doing might be out of line, but at least he's doing something.
pocat, I couldn't agree with you more.
38
posted on
03/21/2005 9:36:55 AM PST
by
GarySpFc
(Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
To: Rembrandt_fan
I disagree that jury nullification is a proper venue for dissatisfaction with the status quo. Not sure of the context of your statement, but nullification (in my view, anyway) is more like an act of sabotage: an act lacking the moral authority of Thoreau-like civil disobedience or the physical courage of the armed revolutionary. So what should a juror do when a defendant is charged under an unconstitutional law?
39
posted on
03/21/2005 9:40:51 AM PST
by
Sloth
(I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
To: sinkspur
Just another opportunity to further their cause and get some publicity for the du'jour crowd.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson